What's new
By:
USCHO Fan Forum

This is a sample guest message. Register a free account today to become a member! Once signed in, you'll be able to participate on this site by adding your own topics and posts, as well as connect with other members through your own private inbox!

  • The USCHO Fan Forum has migrated to a new plaform, xenForo. Most of the function of the forum should work in familiar ways. Please note that you can switch between light and dark modes by clicking on the gear icon in the upper right of the main menu bar. We are hoping that this new platform will prove to be faster and more reliable. Please feel free to explore its features.

Campaign 2016 Part XI: the Two Party Problem

Status
Not open for further replies.
Re: Campaign 2016 Part XI: the Two Party Problem

Rover said:
A two hour meeting??? This is the first time I've almost felt sorry for Paul Ryan:

http://thehill.com/blogs/ballot-box/presidential-races/279675-trump-ryan-signal-unity

From my sources:

TRUMP (for first 1 hour and 59 minutes): I'M THE AWESOMEST PARTY NOMINEE WHO EVER AWESOMED. WORSHIP ME YOU LITTLE BAHSTID. WORSHIP MEEEEE!!!!

RYAN (in last minute): So, we're okay with the racism, torture, and mass deportations, but my people need your assurance that massive tax cuts for our billionaire campaign contributors as well as raising defense spending through the roof is a go.

TRUMP: Hey, I'm a billionaire! Are you doing all of this just for me?

RYAN: Ummm.....YES! That's the ticket. This tax cut is all for you, because you're uhh...Awesome, and there will be a few of our friends who are kinda awesome, just not as much as you, who will get some tax cuts too. Oh, and we'll throw in a free aircraft carrier with your name on it with the increased defense budget.

TRUMP: WE'RE GONNA MAKE AMERICA GREAT AGAIN BABY! SEE HOW AWESOME I AM?
Click to expand...

This is exactly right.
 
Re: Campaign 2016 Part XI: the Two Party Problem

SJHovey said:
This is where you're wrong. I've said it before and I'll say it again. Once Trump has the nomination, he isn't going to run on "conservative" issues. He's going to run to the left of Clinton. We'll be hearing about taxing the rich, higher minimum wages, blah, blah, blah.

And that will be entertaining. Dealing with a candidate who will say anything, and with a general public that doesn't care, is extremely difficult for politicians who play by the old rules.

But it also creates a problem for the "establishment" Republicans. It's one thing to back a blowhard that everyone else in your party is backing. It's another to back him and then have him come out he next day and tell everyone that under a Trump presidency the minimum wage will be $20/hr.
Click to expand...

He can do that all he likes, but it will get him jack sh !t. Say one thing one day and something completely different the next and pretty soon people on both sides don't trust you. We aren't living in 1968 where Nixon can contradict a statement he made during the primaries to a different audience in the general election and nobody will notice. Trump is going to have to fight the probably accurate perception that he's unhinged. Having a debate within his own mind isn't going to help dispel that worry. Remember, this will be the person in charge of the nukes and all that. :eek: Its going to take the Clinton campaign about a millisecond to capitalize on Trump's mental instability.
 
Re: Campaign 2016 Part XI: the Two Party Problem

This is great.

The sexism of the interviewer (the questions, at least) is almost unbelievable now.

We have all come a long way.
 
Last edited:
Re: Campaign 2016 Part XI: the Two Party Problem

Welp, that honeymoon was short.

One of Donald Trump's top allies in Congress slammed the presumptive GOP nominee after he failed to meet with rank-and-file lawmakers backing his campaign during his ballyhooed trip to Capitol Hill on Thursday.

Rep. Duncan Hunter (R-Calif.) told POLITICO that Trump refused multiple requests to meet with members of Congress working to round up support for him in Washington.
Click to expand...
 
Re: Campaign 2016 Part XI: the Two Party Problem

I'm amused by pundidiotry's recent trend of discovery that Trump does in fact speak for Republicans. They're astonished that his favorable ratings amongst Goopers are rising. No sh !t Sherlock. As I said before, aside from Mormons and private equity guys, who amongst the 61M Mittens voters is less excited to vote for Trump than they were for Romney? :confused:

Trump will get his 60M votes (1M Romney voters have "aged out" since 2012). His problem is getting 6M Obama voters to not show up for Hillary even though the SCOTUS is at risk of being taken over by a rodeo clown, amongst other issues. If his idiocy plus her presumed appeal to older women gets her close to Obama in 08 #'s Paul Ryan might need to start looking for another job as I hear Minority Leader in the House ain't no fun. :D
 
Re: Campaign 2016 Part XI: the Two Party Problem

rufus said:
Gotta put the peons in their proper place, before His Greatness deigns to appear before them. Make sure they know who the Alpha Dog is.
Click to expand...

I'm sure he has rules about who goes to who, who sits with his back to the window, and all that rot.
 
Re: Campaign 2016 Part XI: the Two Party Problem

I've often thought Sanders the candidate is better than the Sanders campaign, which seems to be run by idiots. When they're not hacking into their opponents database and downloading files or blowing off having their old Jewish guy from Brooklyn candidate competing in Florida which is chock full of old Jewish guys from Brooklyn, they're not keeping a lid on their supporters who don't seem to understand that the Democratic party rules tend to favor, you know, registered Democrats. :rolleyes: Its like when they complain about closed primaries that only allow registered Dems to vote. The horror!

I can easily see Sanders delegates being denied because of some rules about being a registered Dem for a little while in order to vote in a Dem caucus. Chair throwing as a response is more of a Trump campaign thing people. :D
 
Re: Campaign 2016 Part XI: the Two Party Problem

Rover said:
I've often thought Sanders the candidate is better than the Sanders campaign, which seems to be run by idiots. When they're not hacking into their opponents database and downloading files or blowing off having their old Jewish guy from Brooklyn candidate competing in Florida which is chock full of old Jewish guys from Brooklyn, they're not keeping a lid on their supporters who don't seem to understand that the Democratic party rules tend to favor, you know, registered Democrats. :rolleyes: Its like when they complain about closed primaries that only allow registered Dems to vote. The horror!

I can easily see Sanders delegates being denied because of some rules about being a registered Dem for a little while in order to vote in a Dem caucus. Chair throwing as a response is more of a Trump campaign thing people. :D
Click to expand...

so much for all those bern feelers just falling in with the hilly crowd come the general then you've been counting on, huh.... :rolleyes:
 
Re: Campaign 2016 Part XI: the Two Party Problem

Rover said:
I've often thought Sanders the candidate is better than the Sanders campaign, which seems to be run by idiots. When they're not hacking into their opponents database and downloading files or blowing off having their old Jewish guy from Brooklyn candidate competing in Florida which is chock full of old Jewish guys from Brooklyn, they're not keeping a lid on their supporters who don't seem to understand that the Democratic party rules tend to favor, you know, registered Democrats. :rolleyes: Its like when they complain about closed primaries that only allow registered Dems to vote. The horror!

I can easily see Sanders delegates being denied because of some rules about being a registered Dem for a little while in order to vote in a Dem caucus. Chair throwing as a response is more of a Trump campaign thing people. :D
Click to expand...

Well, Hillary has all the good campaign staff well-paid and in her back pocket :D. So no wonder Bernie is stuck with the scraps.
 
Re: Campaign 2016 Part XI: the Two Party Problem

mookie1995 said:
so much for all those bern feelers just falling in with the hilly crowd come the general then you've been counting on, huh.... :rolleyes:
Click to expand...

Ahhh silly silly mookie. I appreciate the concern trolling, but its not going to be a problem because of two magic words: "President Trump" :eek: :D

That, coupled with a once in a generation chance to pack the SCOTUS with liberals, pretty much gets all of the Bernie people on board. Fact is, if you do the math, she can probably afford to lose 25% of them and still win in a walk, provided they just stay home and don't vote for Trump. Using our own internal calculations here at Rover Nation, which I'm not at liberty to make public at this time, we're estimating about 10% of his people stay home in November... ;)
 
Re: Campaign 2016 Part XI: the Two Party Problem

We still have a Benghazi committee.

That's all anyone need know about the GOP and governing.
 
Re: Campaign 2016 Part XI: the Two Party Problem

In an interview with The New York Times' columnist Maureen Dowd, Trump responded "You mean Pocahontas?" when he was asked about his disputes on Twitter with Sen. Warren, D-Mass.
Click to expand...

Just imagine if Hillary blows this.
 
Re: Campaign 2016 Part XI: the Two Party Problem

If Hillary does blow it that means Trump will get away without releasing his tax returns after telling everyone that Romney suffered because he released his too late.
 
Re: Campaign 2016 Part XI: the Two Party Problem

ScoobyDoo said:
If Hillary does blow it that means Trump will get away without releasing his tax returns after telling everyone that Romney suffered because he released his too late.
Click to expand...

Of the 3 remaining candidates for President only one has released all tax returns going back decades....
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top