USCHO Fan Forum
This is a sample guest message. Register a free account today to become a member! Once signed in, you'll be able to participate on this site by adding your own topics and posts, as well as connect with other members through your own private inbox!
-
The USCHO Fan Forum has migrated to a new plaform, xenForo. Most of the function of the forum should work in familiar ways. Please note that you can switch between light and dark modes by clicking on the gear icon in the upper right of the main menu bar. We are hoping that this new platform will prove to be faster and more reliable. Please feel free to explore its features.
Business, Economics & Tax Policy 6.0: Nope, it only found woven strands
- Thread starter FlagDUDE08
- Start date
- Status
And it could go up 40%, too. Do they give a probability or are they trying to scare everybody to sell to so their traders can make commissions?
Re: Business, Economics & Tax Policy 6.0: Nope, it only found woven strands
Companies give guidance to help investors in general and their clients in particular protect themselves. Doubt that the $8 per trade will move the needle for a company like JPM.
Companies give guidance to help investors in general and their clients in particular protect themselves. Doubt that the $8 per trade will move the needle for a company like JPM.
dxmnkd316
Lucia Apologist
Re: Business, Economics & Tax Policy 6.0: Nope, it only found woven strands
It's probably just wild conjecture. It's not the trading, it's the management of money and wealth. This is just a way to get those fee-based people who own tens of millions to get back in and start moving **** around.
Of course the market could drop 40%. It could drop 40% tomorrow if the Norks drop a bomb on Seoul. Or it could go up 40% in the next few years.
It's probably just wild conjecture. It's not the trading, it's the management of money and wealth. This is just a way to get those fee-based people who own tens of millions to get back in and start moving **** around.
Of course the market could drop 40%. It could drop 40% tomorrow if the Norks drop a bomb on Seoul. Or it could go up 40% in the next few years.
St. Clown
Liberal Rebel Scum, apparently
Re: Business, Economics & Tax Policy 6.0: Nope, it only found woven strands
Given the state of wages, the general velocity of the stock market, a semi-lethargic growth rate of GDP, what's a more like scenario between a 40% gain or a 40% loss? I think 40% is too much, but they probably have a more complete set of numbers than I do, and mix in some anti-Trump feelings with regards to his trade deficit blathering lately, and there you have it.
Given the state of wages, the general velocity of the stock market, a semi-lethargic growth rate of GDP, what's a more like scenario between a 40% gain or a 40% loss? I think 40% is too much, but they probably have a more complete set of numbers than I do, and mix in some anti-Trump feelings with regards to his trade deficit blathering lately, and there you have it.
FadeToBlack&Gold
Microlot Marxist
Re: Business, Economics & Tax Policy 6.0: Nope, it only found woven strands
There's no question there will be major corrections, it's only a matter of when.
There's no question there will be major corrections, it's only a matter of when.
ScoobyDoo
NPC
Re: Business, Economics & Tax Policy 6.0: Nope, it only found woven strands
http://www.startribune.com/manning-sold-papa-john-s-stores-2-days-before-nfl-cut-chain/476194673/
Looks like Peyton had some insider information that wasn't available to the buyers. I think that's probably illegal.
http://www.startribune.com/manning-sold-papa-john-s-stores-2-days-before-nfl-cut-chain/476194673/
Looks like Peyton had some insider information that wasn't available to the buyers. I think that's probably illegal.
Did he own steel stock, too?
Kepler
Si certus es dubita
Re: Business, Economics & Tax Policy 6.0: Nope, it only found woven strands
Funny story.
These are the most hilariously corrupt crooks and thieves since Harding's thugs.
Funny story.
These are the most hilariously corrupt crooks and thieves since Harding's thugs.
Re: Business, Economics & Tax Policy 6.0: Nope, it only found woven strands
I have no idea how the deal went down, but those sorts of things are usually months to over a year in the making. I seriously doubt there was any insider info used in the decision.
I have no idea how the deal went down, but those sorts of things are usually months to over a year in the making. I seriously doubt there was any insider info used in the decision.
<img src="http://www.zipdialog.com/wp-content/uploads/2017/03/Brooklyn-Bridge-For-Sale-90-off-labeled-200px-no-margins.png"/src>
FlagDUDE08
Banned
Re: Business, Economics & Tax Policy 6.0: Nope, it only found woven strands
Weren't they supposed to have plummeted on about three separate occasions last year?
Hang on, let me pull some random numbers out of my *** and create a correlation...
Weren't they supposed to have plummeted on about three separate occasions last year?
Hang on, let me pull some random numbers out of my *** and create a correlation...
bronconick
Yep, still here
Re: Business, Economics & Tax Policy 6.0: Nope, it only found woven strands
All he would have needed was info on when the NFL contract was ending. since everyone knew Papa Johns & the NFL wanted out. He probably has inside info on top of that, but that's probably enough to get around it.
All he would have needed was info on when the NFL contract was ending. since everyone knew Papa Johns & the NFL wanted out. He probably has inside info on top of that, but that's probably enough to get around it.
mookie1995
there's a good buck in that racket.
Could
Re: Business, Economics & Tax Policy 6.0: Nope, it only found woven strands
Could the economic numbers be increasingly fudged? There's arguably nothing else that would improve a politicians chances of being elected or current sitting power than good economic numbers.
Could the economic numbers be increasingly fudged? There's arguably nothing else that would improve a politicians chances of being elected or current sitting power than good economic numbers.
Depends on which #s you use. IIRC, there are a whole bunch of unemployment %s. You always flaunt the # that makes you look good and bury the ones that don't.
Re: Business, Economics & Tax Policy 6.0: Nope, it only found woven strands
I'm good with using numbers that make you look better...because that's what every administration has done since the beginning of time. I'm not good with falsifying numbers.
I'm good with using numbers that make you look better...because that's what every administration has done since the beginning of time. I'm not good with falsifying numbers.
Re: Business, Economics & Tax Policy 6.0: Nope, it only found woven strands
they were fake when it was Obama. Now that Trumpy is in charge all the good economic numbers are real.
they were fake when it was Obama. Now that Trumpy is in charge all the good economic numbers are real.
unofan
Well-known member
No, the widely reported one is always the U3 number. People who want to score political points against the majority party throw out the U6 number because it includes more people.
In reality, it doesn't matter which you use, because the change is what matters and they track one another almost 100%. In other words, when the U3 drops from 5 to 4 percent, the U6 will drop by a similar percentage (say 10 to 8, as an example).
- Status