What's new
USCHO Fan Forum

This is a sample guest message. Register a free account today to become a member! Once signed in, you'll be able to participate on this site by adding your own topics and posts, as well as connect with other members through your own private inbox!

  • The USCHO Fan Forum has migrated to a new plaform, xenForo. Most of the function of the forum should work in familiar ways. Please note that you can switch between light and dark modes by clicking on the gear icon in the upper right of the main menu bar. We are hoping that this new platform will prove to be faster and more reliable. Please feel free to explore its features.

Business, Economics, and Taxes: Capitalism. Yay? >=(

Status
Not open for further replies.
St clown?

This stuff flies a bit above my head. I understand they're basically changing what counts a "liquid" assets. I don't understand the impact to the market without reading more. Probably a lot of "ooga booga scary! Me want less regulations" nonsense.

edit, the more I read, the less I think I was even close.

The short version is that it takes cash out of the economy as banks have to keep more cash within their FRB accounts. That would, normally, cause an increase in market interest rates as there’s less cash available to lend. However, given the tendency to try keeping interest rates as near zero as they can, I expect the Fed to start buying some Treasury debt to inject more cash into the system, offsetting the Required Ratio reset.
 
QE is putting more cash into the economy. Increasing the scope of what’s applied to the Required Ratio, or the % of the ratio itself, would cause the opposite. That’s why I think there will be an offsetting action taken by the Fed in the near future.
 
QE is putting more cash into the economy. Increasing the scope of what’s applied to the Required Ratio, or the % of the ratio itself, would cause the opposite. That’s why I think there will be an offsetting action taken by the Fed in the near future.

RIght, yeah, I wasn't very clear. I meant the Fed buying treasuries to offset is a form of QE.
 
Suez Canal update: Ever Given still stuck.

CNBC reporting that it could now take weeks to free the ship, potentially starting to impact global prices by next month.
 
Suez Canal update: Ever Given still stuck.

CNBC reporting that it could now take weeks to free the ship, potentially starting to impact global prices by next month.

This is the image that has been circulating about the ostensible "traffic jam" caused by the ship, but for all I know this is what ordinary traffic flow looks like:

ExOoL9JVIAAZ0po_605b38316ee37.jpg



From one of the coolest sites on the net: there's our baby.
 
Last edited:
I’m relieved to see our news sources are capable of reporting on something as important as Suez Canal traffic, while also reporting on alleged sexual predators like Cuomo and Watson. By chance, does the Suez Canal do more worldly business than that bridge in New York? ;-)
 
This is the image that has been circulating about the ostensible "traffic jam" caused by the ship, but for all I know this is what ordinary traffic flow looks like:
Yeah - even when traffic is normal, all those same ships would be there. The key tell would be *velocity* data, not position. There and moving = normal. There and stopped = slight problem.
 
Suez Canal update: Ever Given still stuck.

CNBC reporting that it could now take weeks to free the ship, potentially starting to impact global prices by next month.

Anyone who thought this was going to take a day or two doesn't understand m*v

220,000 tons * 13 knots = LOL. Imagine a train 220 miles long (or 110 miles if you can double stack the containers). That's how much cargo this bad boy holds.
 
Anyone who thought this was going to take a day or two doesn't understand m*v

220,000 tons * 13 knots = LOL. Imagine a train 220 miles long (or 110 miles if you can double stack the containers). That's how much cargo this bad boy holds.

Recalls to mind one of my favorite mind-blowing stats from CERN: at full energy, the beam of protons circulating inside the LHC (rest mass less than a billionth of a pound) has as much kinetic energy as a typical TGV train (France's 350 km/hr high speed rail).
 
Did someone stop and think maybe the size of ships through the skinny canal has to be regulated? That ship is massive.

Why would you think it's not regulated?

Of course it is, and it's worked well for many tens of thousands of trips through the canal. Maybe this really was a 9-sigma event? Incredibly unlikely things happen all the time - every time there's a mega lottery winner, a billion-to-one shot just occurred. No way to know if this was a systemic failure or bad luck until the forensics are complete.
 
Why would you think it's not regulated?

Of course it is, and it's worked well for many tens of thousands of trips through the canal. Maybe this really was a 9-sigma event? Incredibly unlikely things happen all the time - every time there's a mega lottery winner, a billion-to-one shot just occurred. No way to know if this was a systemic failure or bad luck until the forensics are complete.

Cause it doesn't pass the eye test. Seems to me the globe is having a whole shit ton of 9-sigma events lately.
 
Cause it doesn't pass the eye test. Seems to me the globe is having a whole **** ton of 9-sigma events lately.

Sure is. And always has. With many trilllions of "events" each day, unlikley things are......likely....to happen. That does not prove that they were not, in fact, unlikely.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top