Re: Buffalo Bulls varsity men's ice hockey?
I just think this league will be on par with what the CHA. It's an improvement from the AHA, but I don't see it being a major factor in hockey.
I think those teams would at least have a chance of having an impact ... whereas the AHA does not have that chance so long as it remains a "cost-containment" league with its traditional bottom-feeders.
The problem with the CHA was primarily the geography although it usually did have a "problem" program or two, e.g., Findlay or Wayne State. By problem, I mean poor support from admin, no on-campus facility, etc.
The spread out geography of CHA impacted travel all season but always caused an issue in the tournament, especially with site selection and fan attendance. Geography would be no problem in the new conference, no comparison at all to the issues that CHA encountered, so strike that as a factor in your comparison.
If you take out Niagara and RoMo, the two members who would be common to both, then you need to compare the remaining programs ... RIT, BGSU, Canisius and UB(?) v. Wayne State, Findlay and probably AFA. WSU was competitive on the ice but had lots of support issues. AFA had good support but did not experience much on-ice success until moving to the AHA. Findlay was pretty much a disaster. Among the proposed, there is an unknown (UB?), and Canisius has issues but at least has a consistent history and support of admin.
Ali-in-all, I see only the weakest of comparisons to the old CHA.