Re: BU 2013-2014 (Part III): Close your eyes, we're coming up on the end here...
Valid, but too much turnover could be harmful to long term plans.
Judging his performance for something of this nature is more about his response than that it happened in the first place, unless there were obvious warning signs he missed, but no one (not even Hoky!) predicted incidents were about to occur. Players lost priviledges midseason and a succession plan including the coach retiring at the end of the following season was created and kept private. If that was unsatisfactory what would you propose he do differently? I'm sure you can come up with something else but there is no plan that would be universally approved, such is life.
There are other employees in the department besides the AD and coaching staffs. Including 8 in the "Marketing" department directory and another 15 on the HAA directory. Much like an AD is ultimately responsible for winning but the day to day events that lead to such results are carried out by coaches, so is the success of other areas of the department. It is also entirely possible his/their goal was to maximize revenue not butts in seats and that the practices you hate did just that.
New Balance field is just the most recent project, there were many others over the past decade, including a $90+m hockey rink.
With such an impressive resume I'm worried dozens of other schools will want him in short order
Get good people in here and worry about the stepping stone issue if/when it arrives. If you set up a good department you should have quality people ready to step in if somebody leaves.
Valid, but too much turnover could be harmful to long term plans.
Whether its his job directly (for example, ultimately keeping the athletes under control is his job, and if a coach who is directly responsible can't do that he/she needs to go) or indirectly he hasn't performed well.
Judging his performance for something of this nature is more about his response than that it happened in the first place, unless there were obvious warning signs he missed, but no one (not even Hoky!) predicted incidents were about to occur. Players lost priviledges midseason and a succession plan including the coach retiring at the end of the following season was created and kept private. If that was unsatisfactory what would you propose he do differently? I'm sure you can come up with something else but there is no plan that would be universally approved, such is life.
Attendance at sporting events is 100% his job. Frankly its about his most important duty. If the fan experience sucks, its not the hockey/hoops/badminton coach who's responsible for that. I doubt Quinn suggested 8 dollar beers and 12 bucks to park on campus.That's Lynch's duty and he failed. Great, we've got a new lacrosse field and somebody got New Balance to pony up for it. That doesn't make up for the problems we've been having lately.
There are other employees in the department besides the AD and coaching staffs. Including 8 in the "Marketing" department directory and another 15 on the HAA directory. Much like an AD is ultimately responsible for winning but the day to day events that lead to such results are carried out by coaches, so is the success of other areas of the department. It is also entirely possible his/their goal was to maximize revenue not butts in seats and that the practices you hate did just that.
New Balance field is just the most recent project, there were many others over the past decade, including a $90+m hockey rink.
I know a guy who has great experience in an AD role that isn't doing much lately. He's very expensive though. Make sure to save some room for the plaque in the BU HOF that he'll eventually put up for himself too.
With such an impressive resume I'm worried dozens of other schools will want him in short order