mookie1995
there's a good buck in that racket.
Who will the "realigned" players be? Any guesses?
Mookie put up his guess list 8 weeks ago...
Who will the "realigned" players be? Any guesses?
Who will the "realigned" players be? Any guesses?
Just about the entire junior and senior classes?
Don't get me wrong, they work hard, represent BC well, etc... but... from pure on ice standpoint...
Who will the "realigned" players be? Any guesses?
Whoever gets the gate certainly can't say he wasn't given every opportunity to earn a spot. They all played quite a bit.
It will be interesting to see. I personally would hope that the cuts would be based more on the "social and academic" part of what he mentioned.
I've always been a beliver that if someone will show up to practice with a good attidude and work ethic and be a good teammate etc, that they can only help the team (even if they are not quite talented enough to earn much playing time).
Can Quinn make some cuts to the BC roster too? Please?
I wonder if Jofa still thinks Coyle is a 'dog with fleas.'
How does this all work? I thought that 4 year scholarships were not revocable for performance or injury. Do most scholarship players get one-year support with "do well and you might get more?"It will be interesting to see. I personally would hope that the cuts would be based more on the "social and academic" part of what he mentioned.
I've always been a beliver that if someone will show up to practice with a good attidude and work ethic and be a good teammate etc, that they can only help the team (even if they are not quite talented enough to earn much playing time).
How does this all work? I thought that 4 year scholarships were not revocable for performance or injury. Do most scholarship players get one-year support with "do well and you might get more?"
This is true, but not universally. In our case, there are a couple of players on the roster who simply do not have the talent level to compete in Hockey East, and performed woefully subpar under Quinn's system. It's a bit cold-hearted to say that, but it's true, and we all saw it. While it's good to have role players on the team who exude great work ethic and are locker room guys, if the skill simply isn't there when, as steakbomb correctly pointed out, they had PLENTY of opportunity last season to prove they could at least compete, they need to go. No one on lines 3, 4, and the bench can make any sort of claim that they didn't have the opportunity to show they deserved more PT.
The kind of role players we need are the Matt Lanes and Luke Popkos of the world. Certainly, they're not the most talented guys on the ice and won't be playing in the NHL anytime soon, but they do have the skill to compete on the ice without bringing the team down. And that's when their work ethic, stick-to-itiveness, and specialty skills (win a faceoff, PK, physicality) fill the gaps between their talent and the top guys on the other team. We need those guys, but not ones who, despite working hard, cannot be on the ice at all in the third period because they're just not good enough.
The cutting has begun.
one + on your list of "non" cuts shown door
The cutting has begun.
one + on your list of "non" cuts shown door
Need another hint
not gryz
When you know some information and feel able to make it public, why do you choose to post in cryptic gobbledygook?The cutting has begun.
one + on your list of "non" cuts shown door
When you know some information and feel able to make it public, why do you choose to post in cryptic gobbledygook?
Between you and mookie- oy!