Re: Bottom-Feeders Bracket; Road to "FutileFour" team selection process
No. Not exactly. Unfortunately this didn't post right either. Somehow when this got posted it "self justified" and doesn't show what I meant either. But to try and put it into words, roughly #1 AHA=#4 ECAC. Now it will vary from year to year, or course. AHA bottom feeders will usually be worse than any ECAC team. And it is never going to be a perfect match, i.e. #4 AHA might be better than #8 ECAC some years and worse others, but I think the fundamental point is that the AHA as a whole could compete with the ECAC as a whole. Much like the relationship between HEA and the ECAC. Hockey East is probably over all better, especially at the top most years. But if you take the 3rd place AHA team, the 6th ranked ECAC team and the 7th ranked HEA team, put them out there in unmarked uniforms, I'm not sure you'd know who was who.So, you're saying that the 7-12 AHA teams could beat ECAC's #12 Harvard more than 5 out of 10 times? Even going up to Cornell and Colgate at 10/11? Doubtful.