Absolutely bonkers how bad these numbers are.
A little bit of additional number crunching on these 24 starts.
After 1 Period: Save % .894.
-GAA is .875 which isn't bad, but opponents are only averaging a tick over 8 shots on goal against BC in the first period in these starts
After 2 Periods: Save % .900.
-GAA 1.625. On average SOG is about just over 16 SOG through 2, so just about another 8 SOG this period. Basically exactly the same as the first period.
Inability to get a lot of early saves are killing these performances. The age old adage that goalies need rubber is certainly supported here.
Some further breakdowns of numbers
10+ SOG in the first period, he has a record of 6-2-0.
- Save % after 1: .949
- Save % after 2: .930
<9 SOG in the first period, record 9-6-1
- Save % after 1: .842
- Save % after 2: .877
<7 SOG in the first period, record 8-5-1
- Save % after 1: .831
- Save % after 2: .872
As you can see the save % (and winning %) decline as he sees less pucks. It's pretty impressive that in these 24 starts, the defense has been able to keep the SOG numbers so low. I think given these numbers, it is deflating mentally on the bench. "Run support" is always helpful and provides margin for error and there's plenty of discussion to go around there as well as talking about shot quality but you need to get some big saves from a goalie early and it's not happening.