What's new
By:
USCHO Fan Forum

This is a sample guest message. Register a free account today to become a member! Once signed in, you'll be able to participate on this site by adding your own topics and posts, as well as connect with other members through your own private inbox!

  • The USCHO Fan Forum has migrated to a new plaform, xenForo. Most of the function of the forum should work in familiar ways. Please note that you can switch between light and dark modes by clicking on the gear icon in the upper right of the main menu bar. We are hoping that this new platform will prove to be faster and more reliable. Please feel free to explore its features.

Big Ten > NCHC

Status
Not open for further replies.
Slap Shot said:
Haha I just received the following rep:



1. Settle down, Beavis
2. Did that hit too close to home?
3. Dickle$s? Well I never!!!
Click to expand...
1. Kiss my ***.
2. Yes, your brilliant post really hit close to home. My dad was a writer on Walk Hard.
3. You suck and your posts suck. I hope a tsunami hits the Philippines and you are the only casualty.
 
Re: Big Ten > NCHC

icehawk said:
A 21 year old Canadien freshman goalie gets the shutout for the Gophers over SCSU 2-0. All of a sudden Gopher fans are saying so what if he’s from Canada. ;)
Click to expand...

Gophers gave up recruiting only Minnesotans, and only Americans back around the turn of the century? *** are you talking about???

Part of that was in response to Woog's never winning a title, and Minnesotans feeling a few non-Minnesotans would be ok. Another part was that the work of making THE State of Hockey, into what it is, and the hard work of guys like John and Cliff paying off, was for the most part, DONE. UMn's women's program was up and going and doing very well, because of women in THE State of Hockey also being awesome. Former Gophers had led the Gophers to multiple Titles, and Wisconsin to multiple Titles and UND to multiple Titles in men's hockey and had even led a team to a Stanley Cup Title. The NHL was now a believer in collegian hockey players being ready for the NHL, and UMD, SCSU, Mankato St and even little Bemidji St were all now Div 1 programs, and were all in the Mighty old WCHA, so what else was needed to be done for college hockey in the US, or for US Olympic hockey???

So the fact that you are bringing this us as if it's significant, is kind of funny.
 
FredsDeadFriend said:
Gophers gave up recruiting only Minnesotans, and only Americans back around the turn of the century? *** are you talking about???

Part of that was in response to Woog's never winning a title, and Minnesotans feeling a few non-Minnesotans would be ok. Another part was that the work of making THE State of Hockey, into what it is, and the hard work of guys like John and Cliff paying off, was for the most part, DONE. UMn's women's program was up and going and doing very well, because of women in THE State of Hockey also being awesome. Former Gophers had led the Gophers to multiple Titles, and Wisconsin to multiple Titles and UND to multiple Titles in men's hockey and had even led a team to a Stanley Cup Title. The NHL was now a believer in collegian hockey players being ready for the NHL, and UMD, SCSU, Mankato St and even little Bemidji St were all now Div 1 programs, and were all in the Mighty old WCHA, so what else was needed to be done for college hockey in the US, or for US Olympic hockey???

So the fact that you are bringing this us as if it's significant, is kind of funny.
Click to expand...

No one cares.
 
FredsDeadFriend said:
Gophers gave up recruiting only Minnesotans, and only Americans back around the turn of the century? *** are you talking about???

Part of that was in response to Woog's never winning a title, and Minnesotans feeling a few non-Minnesotans would be ok. Another part was that the work of making THE State of Hockey, into what it is, and the hard work of guys like John and Cliff paying off, was for the most part, DONE. UMn's women's program was up and going and doing very well, because of women in THE State of Hockey also being awesome. Former Gophers had led the Gophers to multiple Titles, and Wisconsin to multiple Titles and UND to multiple Titles in men's hockey and had even led a team to a Stanley Cup Title. The NHL was now a believer in collegian hockey players being ready for the NHL, and UMD, SCSU, Mankato St and even little Bemidji St were all now Div 1 programs, and were all in the Mighty old WCHA, so what else was needed to be done for college hockey in the US, or for US Olympic hockey???

So the fact that you are bringing this us as if it's significant, is kind of funny.
Click to expand...
Hook, line, and sinker. To easy
 
Re: Big Ten > NCHC

Tipsy McStagger said:
I am here to talk about... their one bid conference.
Click to expand...

One bid conference??? Right now the PWR has the B1G as a solid FOUR bid conference. The NCHC, as it stands RIGHT NOW, is more susceptible to getting only 3 in, than the B1G, as PSU is ranked #12 right now, and UNO is #13, in the PWR
 
FredsDeadFriend said:
One bid conference??? Right now the PWR has the B1G as a solid FOUR bid conference. The NCHC, as it stands RIGHT NOW, is more susceptible to getting only 3 in, than the B1G, as PSU is ranked #12 right now, and UNO is #13, in the PWR
Click to expand...

SCSU, Denver, UND and WMU are in the top 10. Granted, when pretty much all the NCHC are in the top 20 it’s easy to miss one.
 
Re: Big Ten > NCHC

Tipsy McStagger said:
Gopher fans were asking for the thread to be locked because they were getting clowned on so bad.
Click to expand...

Yeah, some Gopher fans are total wusses! I couldn't care less what 2 or 3 wimpy Gopher fans think of me. They were scared the Gophers were going to get swept by the Huskies. I wasn't. I didn't think they would get swept, but it wouldn't have bothered me had they gotten swept. I mean SCSU got swept by DU. And UMn swept Clarkson.

But UMn got the split, and so is 3-3-0 vs teams ranked #1 right now in the PWR(SCSU), KRACH(Notre Dame) & Massey Ratings(Clarkson).
 
Re: Big Ten > NCHC

SJHovey said:
SCSU, Denver, UND and WMU are in the top 10. Granted, when pretty much all the NCHC are in the top 20 it’s easy to miss one.
Click to expand...

You have to be right, lol. I got DU's Krach and Massey ratings listed, but somehow missed them on the PWR? That did seem peculiar since the PWR is the NCHC's most favorable rating service right now. I never claimed I was perfect, :)
 
Re: Big Ten > NCHC

Tipsy McStagger said:
I am here to talk about the #1 hockey team in the country and the #1 hockey conference and contrast them with the #3 hockey team in the state and their one bid conference. If Gopher fans want to lie and say we are begging for respect, I will point that out.
Click to expand...

You should rephrase that as the #1 hockey team in the country, as determined by the worst ratings system EVER PRODUCED in sports history, the RPI/PWR. Because the neither the KRACH or the Massey Ratings has SCSU even in the Top 3.

BOTH the KRACH and the Massey Ratings have SCSU ranked #4.
 
Re: Big Ten > NCHC

SCSU fans act like the PWR rankings are the end all and be all and that its ranking is the Gospel truth, but all the PWR does is determine who gets in and what seeds they get.

The PWR, does NOT determine who wins the games!!!


So consulting other ranking/rating systems is more than legitimate, it should be assumed to be a required thing to do.

What does it say that SINCE I CALLED SCSU's resume into question last week, the KRACH and Massey Ratings BOTH dropped SCSU from #2 and #3, to #4 in both.

Not even Top 3 in either???
 
Last edited:
FredsDeadFriend said:
SCSU fans act like the PWR rankings are the end all and be all and that its ranking is the Gospel truth, but all the PWR does is determine who gets in and what seeds they get.

The PWR, does NOT determine who wins the games!!!


So consulting other ranking/rating systems is more than legitimate, it should be assumed to be a required thing to do.

What does it say that SINCE I CALLED SCSU's resume into question last week, the KRACH and Massey Ratings BOTH dropped SCSU from #2 and #3, to #4 in both.

Not even Top 3 in either???
Click to expand...

Nothing matters til the tournament. All that matters is research funding, goals scored by players who played for your program 13 years ago, and the Massey ratings.

Have fun talking to yourself.

Sincerely,
#1
 
Re: Big Ten > NCHC

You people poke fun of me when I bring up that the Gophers have played the toughest SOS in the nation?


UMn has played SIX games vs teams ranked #1 in the nation by at least one of the 3 main ranking/rating services, and have won 3 of those 6 games.

PWR has SCSU ranked #1, UMn won the home game, lost the road game.

KRACH has N Dm ranked #1, UMn lost both ROAD games.

Massey's Rating has Clarkson ranked #1, UMn won both HOME games.


All 3 teams are ranked Top 4 in all 3 rankings/ratings. So call that a very authoritative 3-3 record vs Top 4 teams.

UMn split with UND on the ROAD.



Any other team in the nation with double digit games vs Top Ten competition, including SEVEN ROAD GAMES??????????



We won ALL THREE HOME games, and one of the 7 road games!!!

4-6 vs Top Ten teams.


SCSU is only 3-3-1 vs Top Ten teams, with 3 home games, and ONLY FOUR road games. SCSU with only 2 home wins, and just like the Gophers, only 1 road win vs a Top Ten team.


UMn with 4 wins over Top Ten teams, SCSU with only 3.


4 > 3

:)
 
Last edited:
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top