Re: B1G Championship in Detroit
You also have TWICE the population of our state.
Despite having half the people living in our state compared to yours....
Again, I would concede that hockey is bigger in Minnesota statewide...but it's a whole state of 5 million vs. the Detroit-Flint-Ann Arbor area of 5 million plus a few hockey pockets elsewhere...
- We have more registered youth players, despite the fact that our high school players don't register with USA Hockey.
True right now. We had more than Minnesota before the Great Recession, which impacted this state particularly badly and has impacted youth hockey badly. And we do have high school hockey here with non-USA Hockey-registered players. It's just that the best don't go that route, and nobody cares about it besides the players and parents.
- We have produced twice as many current D1 players.
- We have produced twice as many NHL players all time.
- We have produced something like 4x as many Olympians
D1, see my comments about the CHL. And is it really 2 to 1? It wasn't quite that extreme 5 years ago, but I haven't seen recent numbers.
NHL all time, more or less granted (256 to 156), but current numbers, fairly close: 68 Minnesota to 54 Michigan. Compare that to 30 from Massachusetts (population 6.8m), 20 (!) from California (38m), 18 from Illinois (13m) and 15 each from NY State, and Pennsylvania (13m/20m)... it's still the same states at the center of US hockey, although California's rise is intriguing.
Olympics all time, granted, but recent numbers: you had more in 2014, we had more in 2010.
In Michigan people who like hockey get involved in hockey programs and congregate together. They find each other, and there is a rich and healthy niche community that one can be a part of if one makes the effort.
But it is a niche. A large one, but a niche. This is not quite the same thing as identifying who is a fan of the local pro team (the Wings, or the Wild--my experience is that they currently inspire similar levels of fan devotion, though I have no television ratings knowledge to draw from). These are people who know and love hockey.
It's not a niche in Minnesota. Minnesota is saturated with hockey. Duluth has something like 20 outdoor ice rinks in local parks that operate every winter, probably more ice surface than basketball surface in the summer.
I probably spoke too narrowly describing the rural areas as giving Minnesota the statewide advantage. It's the mid-size towns like Duluth, too. Places like Grand Rapids, Muskegon, and Traverse City have a good hockey presence, but nothing like Duluth and of much more recent provenance, and some mid-size towns like Lansing and the Tri Cities still aren't really hotbeds of the game at all.
If you are conceding that the Wings' support is at least equal to the Wild's--and you seem to be the only poster who has lived in both states--then it partially supports my point about Detroit vs. Twin Cities, as opposed to Michigan vs. Minnesota: we were talking about tournament attendance, and I was focused on a spectator point-of-view. That said, I wouldn't doubt that, if participation statistics existed for the metro areas rather than state wide, as many Detroiters play as Twin Cities-dwellers (or at least did before the recession).
Certainly, the Michiganians who support the minor pro and major junior teams are a niche.
Detroit is a great hockey hub with many fans of many programs that has a special, unique relationship with its hockey team. In the heydays of the 90s and early 00s, I believe few cities anywhere had such a close relationship with a single team of any sport as Detroit (and the whole state) had with the Red Wings.
But that was not precisely hockey-specific. That is, the love of the Wings wasn't a love of the hockey team that played in Detroit so much as it was the love of a team and a set of players and storylines that, for many fans, just happened to play hockey.
I don't agree with this point completely. Granted, there was a fan survey about 5 years ago that found that the Wings were the most popular local team, while the NFL was the favorite league, which would tend to support your point. On the other hand, that may have just been cynical Detroit hockey fans (and we are a cynical bunch) hating on Bettman and the salary cap. But you can go into a barbershop here (or listen to sports radio) and people will be talking about the Wings as much as any team, and not just about the players. You will hear them talking about the cycle or butterfly goalies. The game itself is loved here. Other levels do not arouse much spectator passion, agreed, but I do not think that the Wings are popular primarily because of the personalities. (Notwithstanding that the Zamboni driver is a celebrity.) The Wings simply are the embodiment of the game here.
Note: this issue has nothing to do with the disaster that is the B1G conference tournament. C'mon, a few weeks ago Michigan and Michigan State played a Friday game at the Joe. It sold out. This game had higher stakes. It... did not sell out. The problem is not the fans, it is the tournament, and I say that as someone who was and remains greatly in favor of the move to a B1G hockey conference.
In the end, this was one of my two main points. Some people were ragging on Michigan's/Detroit's hockey culture because of the tournament attendance. I think that we can all agree that the B1G has done an awful job with this tournament in both cities. These are the best two hockey states, which used to draw great crowds for the WCHA and CCHA. It doesn't reflect on our hockey culture here, or there, that attendance was bad.
My other point was that you cannot compare Michigan and Minnesota based on the colleges...the college game is not, and probably never will be, as big here as there. You can disagree with my conclusion that Detroit is as good/better of a hockey town as the Twin Cities, but I hope that you agree that you have to look at all levels, and direct comparison is hard because the lower levels are so different.
Anyway, congratulations to the Gophers. No question, the best team in the conference this year, if not by much. The strange decline of Michigan hockey continues...three straight years out of the NCAA tournament. You look at what Mel Pearson has accomplished at Tech since he left and begin to wonder...but that's a topic for another thread.