Re: All Things Denver XXXIII
First off, props to Ferris for both a well-played and particularly well-coached game. Their D gave the Pio's very little operating room in the "scorer's box" (mid-to-low slot) all game long. The DU power play was almost amusing in the first 2 periods, with the perimeter umbrella of five controlling the puck but never generating anything of consequence. Ferris played within themselves, played smarter, took away room for Denver's talent to operate and create, and earned the game. In a year where the WCHA and CCHA took a bad pill to start the tourney, my teams left to follow are WMU, then Ferris and Sioux. (Always will be the Sioux, take that NCAA PC Police).
Having watched 3 of the teams that I follow with varying degrees of interest--DU, Miami-OH, and Michigan--all drop tight first rounders yesterday, I had an observation that I wonder if any others picked up on. Each at times played with a certain degree of disinterest, or at least, lack of focus and resolve. Denver really didn't press hard as a team until the 3rd period, even though there were some good individual efforts. (Most notably Zucker, props to playing hard while hurt.) Miami absolutely dozed through 2 periods before deciding to show up, then should have won the game but found a way to lose another heartbreaker. Inconsistency kills--in their case, so did finding a way NOT to score on that late major penalty! Michigan scored immediately, went into a coasting zone, and coasted right into the post-season. In each case...the team with the more noted recruits, the greater by far number of draft picks, and the team with one or more underclassmen that have brought on the "will he or won't he bolt" questions all year...found a way to lose early to a team that had few or no picks and notable players, but played hard and focused and earned a win. One wonders how many players on those more noteworthy teams were dreaming of sugarplum contracts dancing in their heads rather than playing a focused, team game? It's got to be hard at some level to focus on an amateur game when you know that the final L of the season means a big payday, whether at the forefront or subconsciously. I love the college game, but do wonder if those coaches who willingly accept losing one after another premier recruit to the pros after a year or two--George, Red, Blasi among others--have created a monster that will forever make team play in the post-season a challenge. I realize there are and were other factors--DU's team health was clearly a trainwreck going into this tourney, and I honestly think this Denver D corps was mediocre even fully healthy compared to some a few years back--but it's quite noteworthy to see these 3 programs filled with NHL draft picks all exiting to, in all candor, less talented (but greater resolve) teams in Round One. Thoughts????