What's new
USCHO Fan Forum

This is a sample guest message. Register a free account today to become a member! Once signed in, you'll be able to participate on this site by adding your own topics and posts, as well as connect with other members through your own private inbox!

  • The USCHO Fan Forum has migrated to a new plaform, xenForo. Most of the function of the forum should work in familiar ways. Please note that you can switch between light and dark modes by clicking on the gear icon in the upper right of the main menu bar. We are hoping that this new platform will prove to be faster and more reliable. Please feel free to explore its features.

#4 BC vs. #1 Wisconsin - NCAA Semis: BadgerBadgerBadgerBadger... MUSHROOM, MUSHROOM!

If you asked the Gophers, I assure you they'd have a better informed, far more wary and respectful appreciation for the Badgers as an impending foe than is being exhibited by the BC superfan club.
Oh me oh my, I'm not being wary of Wisconsin! Oh Lord'h'mercy, how dare I not show the Badgers the proper *respect*!

Forgive me for not drinking the WCHA kool-aid and falling to my knees to worship the ****ing Badgers. :rolleyes:
 
Re: #4 BC vs. #1 Wisconsin - NCAA Semis: BadgerBadgerBadgerBadger... MUSHROOM, MUSHR

Oh me oh my, I'm not being wary of Wisconsin! Oh Lord'h'mercy, how dare I not show the Badgers the proper *respect*!

Forgive me for not drinking the WCHA kool-aid and falling to my knees to worship the ****ing Badgers. :rolleyes:

Someone better check to see what he is frosting his flakes with these days :eek:
 
Re: #4 BC vs. #1 Wisconsin - NCAA Semis: BadgerBadgerBadgerBadger... MUSHROOM, MUSHR

where can the video feed be found for the games tomorrow? I went to NCAA.com and that is useless....
 
Re: #4 BC vs. #1 Wisconsin - NCAA Semis: BadgerBadgerBadgerBadger... MUSHROOM, MUSHR

I'm as serious as a heart attack.

I really, really hope Wisconsin thinks it can hang with BC with anything other than a perfect performance. Anything less than top speed against BC will put the game out of reach early. Just ask the Gophers.

The BC/Gopher game was the worst I have seen the Gophers play this year. They were capable of much much better, but they didn't play well at all. The Badgers are a very good team, and your girls know that. I can only hope they aren't underestimating them as much as you are.
 
Re: #4 BC vs. #1 Wisconsin - NCAA Semis: BadgerBadgerBadgerBadger... MUSHROOM, MUSHR

Forgive me for not drinking the WCHA kool-aid and falling to my knees to worship the ****ing Badgers. :rolleyes:
Yup...because that's precisely what I stated...you should drop to your knees and worship the Badgers...:rolleyes: That's what being wary means...drop to your knees and worship the Badgers. :rolleyes: Your attitude is up your rear.

I'm confident the Eagles themselves have more respect than you do for their next opponent. Just as I'm sure the Badgers are taking a very business like approach to their semi. I'd also doubt the Eagles are constantly looking back at the quarterfinal vs. Minnesota as some sort of preview for what to expect in the semi against UW. I get the impression you actually think that's valid...I guess 'cause their both WCHA teams?

I'm hoping it's a good game.
 
Re: #4 BC vs. #1 Wisconsin - NCAA Semis: BadgerBadgerBadgerBadger... MUSHROOM, MUSHR

I'm as serious as a heart attack.

I really, really hope Wisconsin thinks it can hang with BC with anything other than a perfect performance. Anything less than top speed against BC will put the game out of reach early. Just ask the Gophers.

What is he smoking? I really want some.
 
Re: #4 BC vs. #1 Wisconsin - NCAA Semis: BadgerBadgerBadgerBadger... MUSHROOM, MUSHR

is there anywhere to watch the game or watch the live stats?
 
Re: #4 BC vs. #1 Wisconsin - NCAA Semis: BadgerBadgerBadgerBadger... MUSHROOM, MUSHR

I'm confident the Eagles themselves have more respect than you do for their next opponent.
I think it's cute that you WCHA fans expected the BC fans and players to approach this game like we should be in *awe* of the mighty Badgers. :rolleyes:
I'd also doubt the Eagles are constantly looking back at the quarterfinal vs. Minnesota as some sort of preview for what to expect in the semi against UW. I get the impression you actually think that's valid...I guess 'cause their both WCHA teams?
The only thing I have said in relation to the Minnesota game is that Wisconsin had better not come out with anything less than their best or it will be out of reach like the Minnesota game. Please tell me where I pointed to the Minnesota game as some sort of "preview" to tomorrow's game.

It's not just one of BC's match-ups that suggests Wisconsin had better be on top of their game. It's the fact that Boston College is just playing superior hockey. That's all.
shrug.gif
 
Re: #4 BC vs. #1 Wisconsin - NCAA Semis: BadgerBadgerBadgerBadger... MUSHROOM, MUSHR

It's not just one of BC's match-ups that suggests Wisconsin had better be on top of their game. It's the fact that Boston College is just playing superior hockey. That's all. [/QUOTE]

I am trying to connect with you here Tony, I had a big bowl of frosted flakes to help me relate.
When did they start playing superior hockey? Was it right after the OT win against PC or the dominating 3-1 win over Northeastern in the final? Certainly you aren't suggesting a trend that began and ended in the 1st period of the Minny game, as I recall Minny out scored and out shot you’re beloved Eagles in the 2nd and 3rd periods

Help me here Tony:confused:
 
Re: #4 BC vs. #1 Wisconsin - NCAA Semis: BadgerBadgerBadgerBadger... MUSHROOM, MUSHR

It's not just one of BC's match-ups that suggests Wisconsin had better be on top of their game. It's the fact that Boston College is just playing superior hockey. That's all.
shrug.gif
I think it's adorable, this fantasy BC fans have that the Eagles are playing superior hockey and will smoke Wisconsin if the Badgers should put forth anything less than perfection in the semifinal. :) Just ask the Gophers...anything less than perfection from UW and it's out of reach early. :rolleyes:
 
Re: #4 BC vs. #1 Wisconsin - NCAA Semis: BadgerBadgerBadgerBadger... MUSHROOM, MUSHR

as I recall Minny out scored and out shot you’re beloved Eagles in the 2nd and 3rd periods
You recall incorrectly. Our worst period was actually the first. We outshot the Gophers in the 2nd. They outshot us in the third. This was with something like a 5-1 penalty advantage to the Gophers.

Not that the shots on goal mattered much. The game was over halfway through the first period. I doubt either team was playing with the same intensity after it was put away.
 
Last edited:
Re: #4 BC vs. #1 Wisconsin - NCAA Semis: BadgerBadgerBadgerBadger... MUSHROOM, MUSHR

Fan-freaking-tastic Grant! Well done my friend!
 
Re: #4 BC vs. #1 Wisconsin - NCAA Semis: BadgerBadgerBadgerBadger... MUSHROOM, MUSHR

This probably isn't the game to bring up, seeing as how we had something like 62 shots in that game.

I believe someone suggested earlier that shots don't matter, but is this when the superior play began? Come on Tony support your argument that BC is playing superior hockey, by what standard. We can't go back as far as the Maine games for high caliber hockey and every game since then was against a lower ranked or seeded team. BC was supposed to win those games, which is why they were the number 4 seed with home ice advantage.:cool:
 
Re: #4 BC vs. #1 Wisconsin - NCAA Semis: BadgerBadgerBadgerBadger... MUSHROOM, MUSHR

Does anyone have contact info for Katie King? Let her know that there's obviously no point in showing up for the game. The other team taking the ice is wearing white and red with a red W, and is flying in from the west, so the game is basically over before it starts.

It'd really save everyone a lot of time and effort.

I think Badger fans are a little worried that their dynasty is about to run into Molly Schaus. Molly Schaus is from Natick. Doug Flutie is from Natick. The logic is unassailable. BC wins by 2.
 
Re: #4 BC vs. #1 Wisconsin - NCAA Semis: BadgerBadgerBadgerBadger... MUSHROOM, MUSHR

I believe someone suggested earlier that shots don't matter, but is this when the superior play began? Come on Tony support your argument that BC is playing superior hockey, by what standard. We can't go back as far as the Maine games for high caliber hockey and every game since then was against a lower ranked or seeded team. BC was supposed to win those games, which is why they were the number 4 seed with home ice advantage.:cool:

Games that happened earlier in the regular season are irrelevant. That's not the way we settle things in the U.S. & A. - it's about who's playing their best at the right time. No one denies this! It's a new season now and BC and Wisconsin are 1-0. BC looked good in their game; so did Wisconsin. BC's outburst against Minnesota shows that they have no fear of opponents just because they're flying in from the west.
 
Back
Top