ScoobyDoo
NPC
Re: 2nd Term, Part VI: Burnin' down the House
Sorry to disappoint but no sarcasm this time. It's a major pet peeve of mine that in an era where we know no one who produces api's, hardware, or major software does really any quality assurance and uses the public as a testing platform we have someone rolling out a major government project without a sniff of a validated testing protocol.
It's ridiculous. There is too much that can go wrong when you do test to skip it altogether. And the amount of money they spent is outrageous and I think they hired someone from Canada? Why? We have plenty of IT talent here in the US.
Wow, I agree with Scooby. There must be some sarcasm in that post I'm not catching.
I work as a business systems analyst, we talk to the people with a stake in the game, write the requirements based upon those talks, work with the developers to help iron out any issues in the requirements, and then functionally test and stress test the bejeebers out of the system prior to the UAT test date and finally then roll out to the production environment. We just rolled out a big project on the 8th, found a couple minor fixes (formatting issues and the like) that will be handled in the next scheduled release, and one "major" flaw that somehow didn't show up in testing even though we tested for that exact scenario. The fix for the major item - which only impacted some 5% of the volume - went in on the 21st.
Sorry to disappoint but no sarcasm this time. It's a major pet peeve of mine that in an era where we know no one who produces api's, hardware, or major software does really any quality assurance and uses the public as a testing platform we have someone rolling out a major government project without a sniff of a validated testing protocol.
It's ridiculous. There is too much that can go wrong when you do test to skip it altogether. And the amount of money they spent is outrageous and I think they hired someone from Canada? Why? We have plenty of IT talent here in the US.