Even the message board picked one up this yearNew heels for everyone !!
Even the message board picked one up this yearNew heels for everyone !!
You know full well the point is she wouldn't be signing it if she was contacted by or interested in Minnesota.Contracts don't mean didly-do these days.
Or her representative told the AD she had been contacted and what did he want to do about it.You know full well the point is she wouldn't be signing it if she was contacted by or interested in Minnesota.
Let it go she isn’t going to MNOr her representative told the AD she had been contacted and what did he want to do about it.There really are no employer/employee loyalties anymore. It's all about the money.
Sure she would sign it because she wants her team not to be looking over their shoulder about her. But she could also have every intent to leave. She will do just about anything to win this weekend. We've all seen college football and basketball coaches have very long contracts and then just up and leave.You know full well the point is she wouldn't be signing it if she was contacted by or interested in Minnesota.
Never said she was.Let it go she isn’t going to MN![]()
Let me save you the trouble. She doesn't have every—or any—intent to leave.Sure she would sign it because she wants her team not to be looking over their shoulder about her. But she could also have every intent to leave. She will do just about anything to win this weekend. We've all seen college football and basketball coaches have very long contracts and then just up and leave.
Yes, they do. Most college coaching contracts have buy-outs written into them, in case the coach wants to go elsewhere, or the school wants to get rid of the coach without cause. The coach movement we see is permitted by the contracts.Contracts don't mean didly-do these days.
Ok this was hilarious
You don't think she or the U have buyouts written in the contract? Of course they do.Yes, they do. Most college coaching contracts have buy-outs written into them, in case the coach wants to go elsewhere, or the school wants to get rid of the coach without cause. The coach movement we see is permitted by the contracts.
I guarantee you that those buy-outs are enforced.
Of course they do. And those buyouts are high enough that the chance of Muzerall going anywhere over the next several years is zero.You don't think she or the U have buyouts written in the contract? Of course they do.
So you are saying there's a chance.....Of course they do. And those buyouts are high enough that the chance of Muzerall going anywhere over the next several years is zero.
I suggest you learn what the word "zero" means.So you are saying there's a chance.....
Is that less than 1?I suggest you learn what the word "zero" means.
Oh come on. I know you know that humor is a thing.I suggest you learn what the word "zero" means.
Kind of like the ridiculous buyout clause in the Wisconsin football coach's contract.Of course they do. And those buyouts are high enough that the chance of Muzerall going anywhere over the next several years is zero.
Put the men's team in the tin can and funding for a new arena would be found before Christmas.Frustrating for so many reasons. Girls hockey is growing here and it’s hard to even suggest new fans even go watch a game there due to the dysfunction and inequity of the rink.
The fact Frost was let go signals a change in the standards for women’s hockey. That should extend to rinks too.
I don’t want OSU to lose Muzerall; she’s helping drive growth of the game here. Not to mention one of the best coaches in the country. Ideally this would be a wake up call for OSU to build a rink. I don’t think it will be, and it will be sad if they lose her. If they don’t, if Minnesota goes another route I hope it emboldens calls for a new rink in OSU, by the coach herself.
Idk, all that school cares about is football.Put the men's team in the tin can and funding for a new arena would be found before Christmas.