What's new
USCHO Fan Forum

This is a sample guest message. Register a free account today to become a member! Once signed in, you'll be able to participate on this site by adding your own topics and posts, as well as connect with other members through your own private inbox!

  • The USCHO Fan Forum has migrated to a new plaform, xenForo. Most of the function of the forum should work in familiar ways. Please note that you can switch between light and dark modes by clicking on the gear icon in the upper right of the main menu bar. We are hoping that this new platform will prove to be faster and more reliable. Please feel free to explore its features.

2020 Democratic Challengers III: Weekend at Bernie's

Status
Not open for further replies.
It’s only been enacted in states where Democrats have had complete control of state government. New Mexico looks like the next to sign on. After that Delaware, Maine, Nevada and Oregon are states with Democrats in power in all branches that have yet to sign on (there is a proposal in Maine that will be going before the legislature).

After that how do you get the rest of the way to 270? The closer it comes, the more opposition will ramp up, and then there are certain to be legal challenges.

I think it’s still got a long road ahead of it.
5 years ago Nate Silver predicted 270 is unlikely, and since then only Connecticut has passed it.
 
Yes, they deserve to be heard as much as you. Not more than you.

How is it more? How is Wyoming more powerful than California under the EC? Wyoming isn't even as powerful as Iowa.

That is the farce of this...you have a point with the two senators but in the National Election they have zero say on the outcome.
 
Doesn't have to be abolished if enough states do an end around.

And who is going to do that? No small state is going to even if they are Blue. Red States for sure won't.

Again I am for divying up the EVs however the state wants but most states have enough issues to solve that it will be ignored.

Edit: this discussion might belong somewhere else. Started a thread :)
 
Last edited:
How is it more? How is Wyoming more powerful than California under the EC? Wyoming isn't even as powerful as Iowa.

That is the farce of this...you have a point with the two senators but in the National Election they have zero say on the outcome.

Wyoming has one electoral vote for roughly every 150,000 people. California has one electoral vote for every 500,000 people. Essentially, the average Wyoming voter has 3.5 times the power of a California voter in the EV.

In the Senate, the difference is starker. A Wyoming voter is equal to 66 California voters.
 
Re: 2020 Democratic Challengers III: Weekend at Bernie's

Name your price. The EC will not be abolished.

Well, it obviously will be, eventually. The long trend in American political history is towards greater democracy and equality. We've been ironing out both Constitutional and statutory inequalities for the last 240 years -- privileges accorded the wealthy, whites, men, whites again have fallen, and we will eventually get rid of privileges given to rural voters for a variety of historical and cultural reasons (slavery, Jeffersonian Utopian primitivism, racism).

The Electoral College falls on the number line somewhere beyond lynchings, poll taxes, and voter id, but it's there for the same purposes and someday we will get rid of it. And that "someday" will be the moment Texas goes blue which, given Yankee techie migration there, Messicans, and the subsequent improvement in both education and overall intelligence, is slated for about 25 years from now.

There is one way to save the EC without instituting a full blown South African apartheid state: split states up into 1 million pop unit states. Create 250 more states out of the big states. Then the effect of the silly states like ND and WY will be completely swamped. MT will have the electoral clout of Brooklyn, as it ought.
 
Last edited:
Re: 2020 Democratic Challengers III: Weekend at Bernie's

<blockquote class="twitter-tweet" data-lang="en"><p lang="en" dir="ltr">Here's the data. <a href="https://t.co/w1WJigC7qE">pic.twitter.com/w1WJigC7qE</a></p>— Nate Silver (@NateSilver538) <a href="https://twitter.com/NateSilver538/status/1102973238672527362?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">March 5, 2019</a></blockquote>
<script async src="https://platform.twitter.com/widgets.js" charset="utf-8"></script>
 
Re: 2020 Democratic Challengers III: Weekend at Bernie's

5 years ago Nate Silver predicted 270 is unlikely, and since then only Connecticut has passed it.

Colorado is getting read to pass it, and then I think New Mexico is looking likely to be next. After that Delaware, Maine, Nevada, and Oregon are the low hanging fruit -- but some of them have had Democrats in control of their legislatures and governorship for a while and haven't taken any steps to sign on.

It doesn't seem very likely to get to 270.
 
Re: 2020 Democratic Challengers III: Weekend at Bernie's

The "popular vote gets the EV" thing is never going to get traction outside of states that already lean or are solidly blue.

Here's an idea - field a candidate who will actually campaign in Pennsylvania, Michigan, Ohio, and Wisconsin this time, instead of taking us for granted and wasting time trying to pick off states like Georgia and Arizona that are still 10+ years away from flipping. What a concept. :rolleyes: I feel like a godd@mn broken record at this point.
 
Re: 2020 Democratic Challengers III: Weekend at Bernie's

The "popular vote gets the EV" thing is never going to get traction outside of states that already lean or are solidly blue.

Here's an idea - field a candidate who will actually campaign in Pennsylvania, Michigan, Ohio, and Wisconsin this time, instead of taking us for granted and wasting time trying to pick off states like Georgia and Arizona that are still 10+ years away from flipping. What a concept. :rolleyes: I feel like a godd@mn broken record at this point.

You sound like a broken record spewing misinformation. The ticket did several events in Pennsylvania and Ohio during the 2016 campaign. The internet is your friend...
 
Re: 2020 Democratic Challengers III: Weekend at Bernie's

You sound like a broken record spewing misinformation. The ticket did several events in Pennsylvania and Ohio during the 2016 campaign. The internet is your friend...

And it didnt do the ones in Wisconsin and Michigan when the operatives on the ground were saying they were in trouble. It isnt like thisnt common knowledge...

It would take a special level of stupid and arrogance to make that mistake again.
 
You sound like a broken record spewing misinformation. The ticket did several events in Pennsylvania and Ohio during the 2016 campaign. The internet is your friend...

Rover needs to take hilly’s Cawk out of his mouth.... she lost. Get over it
 
Re: 2020 Democratic Challengers III: Weekend at Bernie's

It would take a special level of stupid and arrogance to make that mistake again.

Thank you Captain Obvious! ;) The point being that Hil's problem wasn't campaign appearances as she lost PA and OH despite spending time there. Her problem was not inspiring a lazy Dem coalition to vote for her instead of 3rd party candidates or Trump himself. My guess is after 4 years of Chump Dems will vote for a potted plant for President at this point.

mookie, go back to grossing people out on the AOC thread. :D
 
Last edited:
Re: 2020 Democratic Challengers III: Weekend at Bernie's

Can we just please never use Hillary's name again? She is less relevant than Chester A. Arthur. The only purpose of name dropping her is to create a fight between liberals and moderates or give the Hater Base a ragerection (the only kind they can manage anymore).

Love her or hate her, she's dead. Move on.
 
Re: 2020 Democratic Challengers III: Weekend at Bernie's

Can we just please never use Hillary's name again? She is less relevant than Chester A. Arthur. The only purpose of name dropping her is to create a fight between liberals and moderates or give the Hater Base a ragerection (the only kind they can manage anymore).

Love her or hate her, she's dead. Move on.

Those who fail to learn from the past (2000) are doomed to repeat it (2016).
 
Re: 2020 Democratic Challengers III: Weekend at Bernie's

Those who fail to learn from the past (2000) are doomed to repeat it (2016).

Very true. But Hillary didn't lose WI, etc because she didn't go there (as is evidenced by PA, etc). She lost because moderates in the midwest couldn't stand her - PA, OH, IN, MI, IL, WI, IA, MN - she got blitzed in every single last midwest state. Unless the EC goes away in the next 18 months, the lesson is clear. 2020 needs to field a candidate that can win the moderates in the midwest. Now to finding that candidate...
 
Re: 2020 Democratic Challengers III: Weekend at Bernie's

Very true. But Hillary didn't lose WI, etc because she didn't go there (as is evidenced by PA, etc). She lost because moderates in the midwest couldn't stand her - PA, OH, IN, MI, IL, WI, IA, MN - she got blitzed in every single last midwest state. Unless the EC goes away in the next 18 months, the lesson is clear. 2020 needs to field a candidate that can win the moderates in the midwest. Now to finding that candidate...

No. Just no.
 
Re: 2020 Democratic Challengers III: Weekend at Bernie's

No. Just no.

Zoinks. I should have said PA, OH, IN, IL, WI, IA, MN and outstate NY and ME.

https://www.cnbc.com/heres-a-map-of-the-us-counties-that-flipped-to-trump-from-democrats/

Outside of the midwest votes that switched to Trump, what are the Ds options then? Win Florida and Arizona? There are about no other swing electoral votes available nationwide and good luck with those. Win back the midwest or we'll win back Trump.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top