USCHO Fan Forum
This is a sample guest message. Register a free account today to become a member! Once signed in, you'll be able to participate on this site by adding your own topics and posts, as well as connect with other members through your own private inbox!
-
The USCHO Fan Forum has migrated to a new plaform, xenForo. Most of the function of the forum should work in familiar ways. Please note that you can switch between light and dark modes by clicking on the gear icon in the upper right of the main menu bar. We are hoping that this new platform will prove to be faster and more reliable. Please feel free to explore its features.
2020 Democrat Challengers Part II: There Can Be Only One
- Thread starter joecct
- Start date
- Status
mookie1995
there's a good buck in that racket.
Mookie chatting with folks from an embassy last night and was told their govt thinking is preparing for a 2nd term
Re: 2020 Democrat Challengers Part II: There Can Be Only One
Depends on if the Dems can sort out the 50 candidates that have declared. Solidify from the Bern Bros, and some fragments of the wannabes, and the people that don't wanna go full AOC style, Dems have it in the bag. Cut out the big steps, to make small steps. Easy victory. Win small, THEN go big. Don't try to get it all in one shot.
Depends on if the Dems can sort out the 50 candidates that have declared. Solidify from the Bern Bros, and some fragments of the wannabes, and the people that don't wanna go full AOC style, Dems have it in the bag. Cut out the big steps, to make small steps. Easy victory. Win small, THEN go big. Don't try to get it all in one shot.
trixR4kids
Well-known member
Re: 2020 Democrat Challengers Part II: There Can Be Only One
Thanks Hillary
Thanks Hillary
Re: 2020 Democrat Challengers Part II: There Can Be Only One
She had the burden of the Clinton legacy, like it or not. Add to that, "she was one o'dem womenfolk" and there was another strike, like it or not. The third strike was that some people wanted to eff DC up, and she was considered part of DC, Trump wasn't, like it or not.
This crop of Dem candidates, for the most part, don't have all three strikes against them before they start running. A few have two of them, but not all three.
Thanks Hillary
She had the burden of the Clinton legacy, like it or not. Add to that, "she was one o'dem womenfolk" and there was another strike, like it or not. The third strike was that some people wanted to eff DC up, and she was considered part of DC, Trump wasn't, like it or not.
This crop of Dem candidates, for the most part, don't have all three strikes against them before they start running. A few have two of them, but not all three.
duper
Well-known member
Re: 2020 Democrat Challengers Part II: There Can Be Only One
I will do what I can to help this happen, but I have no faith. I really did start thinking, about 6 months before the election, that Trump was going to win and win big. I suspect it will be close in 2020, but I don't know, man, I just think Trump wins reelection.
I will do what I can to help this happen, but I have no faith. I really did start thinking, about 6 months before the election, that Trump was going to win and win big. I suspect it will be close in 2020, but I don't know, man, I just think Trump wins reelection.
Re: 2020 Democrat Challengers Part II: There Can Be Only One
I am still gonna say the Dems will have MN in the bag, despite last election's numbers. Just going by history, here.
I am still gonna say the Dems will have MN in the bag, despite last election's numbers. Just going by history, here.
duper
Well-known member
Re: 2020 Democrat Challengers Part II: There Can Be Only One
I do like to hear that. Dems will get Colorado too, which to me is big, because when I first moved there in 1992, it was not a blue state. Of course, now that I'm in Alaska, well, Dems won't get Alaska, so there's 3 electoral votes to Trump. lol
I am still gonna say the Dems will have MN in the bag, despite last election's numbers. Just going by history, here.
I do like to hear that. Dems will get Colorado too, which to me is big, because when I first moved there in 1992, it was not a blue state. Of course, now that I'm in Alaska, well, Dems won't get Alaska, so there's 3 electoral votes to Trump. lol
Re: 2020 Democrat Challengers Part II: There Can Be Only One
From 1932 onward, the state has primarily voted Democratic, last voting Republican during Nixon’s landslide victory in 1972. In 1984, Minnesotans gave homegrown Senator Mondale his only state in the lopsided loss to Ronald Reagan. While the Democratic winning streak grew to 11 straight elections in 2016, Hillary Clinton only beat Donald Trump by 1.5%.
3 Rs since 1932, in presidential elections.
From 1932 onward, the state has primarily voted Democratic, last voting Republican during Nixon’s landslide victory in 1972. In 1984, Minnesotans gave homegrown Senator Mondale his only state in the lopsided loss to Ronald Reagan. While the Democratic winning streak grew to 11 straight elections in 2016, Hillary Clinton only beat Donald Trump by 1.5%.
3 Rs since 1932, in presidential elections.
duper
Well-known member
Re: 2020 Democrat Challengers Part II: There Can Be Only One
That might be fewer than my original home state of Illinois.
Edit: geez - Illinois is grosser than I thought. They've gone Republican in the Presidential 12 times out of 22. Between that and the ridiculous wind, why the heck does anyone still live there?
That might be fewer than my original home state of Illinois.
Edit: geez - Illinois is grosser than I thought. They've gone Republican in the Presidential 12 times out of 22. Between that and the ridiculous wind, why the heck does anyone still live there?
Last edited:
Re: 2020 Democrat Challengers Part II: There Can Be Only One
lol
If there's one thing we should have learned by now is that the percentage of deplorables is much higher than any of us thought. Id put Trumps chances for re-election > 50%
lol
If there's one thing we should have learned by now is that the percentage of deplorables is much higher than any of us thought. Id put Trumps chances for re-election > 50%
Re: 2020 Democrat Challengers Part II: There Can Be Only One
That's a nice edit job on my post.
That's a nice edit job on my post.
ScoobyDoo
NPC
Re: 2020 Democrat Challengers Part II: There Can Be Only One
This. The tax return story should have had legs. It's already out of the News.
This. The tax return story should have had legs. It's already out of the News.
Re: 2020 Democrat Challengers Part II: There Can Be Only One
You guys whine waaaayyy too much. Here's a magic solution for you. Its crazy, but it just might work!
If everybody who disagrees with Trump votes for the Democratic candidate next year, he and his fellow cult members will lose control of the govt. A far out concept I realize, but at the end of the day people get what they deserve to represent them. Its not like all of the "both sides are equally bad" crowd wasn't warned in full ahead of time.
Yes, voter suppression will be a problem in places like Georgia but in PA, WI, MI, and I believe NC Dems now control all statewide elected offices so no shenanigans with mysterious voting machine breakdowns on election night and last minute ID requirement changes this time. Now go out and earn it. 5 Senate seats are ripe for the picking in swing states: AZ, CO, ME, NC, IA. Don't cry, take them back.
You guys whine waaaayyy too much. Here's a magic solution for you. Its crazy, but it just might work!
If everybody who disagrees with Trump votes for the Democratic candidate next year, he and his fellow cult members will lose control of the govt. A far out concept I realize, but at the end of the day people get what they deserve to represent them. Its not like all of the "both sides are equally bad" crowd wasn't warned in full ahead of time.
Yes, voter suppression will be a problem in places like Georgia but in PA, WI, MI, and I believe NC Dems now control all statewide elected offices so no shenanigans with mysterious voting machine breakdowns on election night and last minute ID requirement changes this time. Now go out and earn it. 5 Senate seats are ripe for the picking in swing states: AZ, CO, ME, NC, IA. Don't cry, take them back.
bronconick
Yep, still here
Re: 2020 Democrat Challengers Part II: There Can Be Only One
Why would it have legs? There was a story about him not paying taxes for a decade in part because he managed to crash and burn a casino and screw up real estate a few years ago. It's like the NYT wants to run it every year. I get it. He's **** with money. Catch him actually laundering the money if you want legs on a story.
Why would it have legs? There was a story about him not paying taxes for a decade in part because he managed to crash and burn a casino and screw up real estate a few years ago. It's like the NYT wants to run it every year. I get it. He's **** with money. Catch him actually laundering the money if you want legs on a story.
ScoobyDoo
NPC
Re: 2020 Democrat Challengers Part II: There Can Be Only One
If a Democrat had not paid taxes for ten years you'd never get it out of the news.
If a Democrat had not paid taxes for ten years you'd never get it out of the news.
FadeToBlack&Gold
Microlot Marxist
Re: 2020 Democrat Challengers Part II: There Can Be Only One
Unless the next recession begins within the next 12 months, I tend to believe you are correct.
Unless the next recession begins within the next 12 months, I tend to believe you are correct.
mookie1995
there's a good buck in that racket.
Kepler
Si certus es dubita
Re: 2020 Democrat Challengers Part II: There Can Be Only One
Incumbents have a good history but there are a few reasons to be a little more positive.
1. No matter who we run it will be a step up.
2. Dump isn't picking up any votes.
3. God murders thousands of Fox viewers every day.
4. An insurgency always has more energy than defense of the status quo.
Incumbents have a good history but there are a few reasons to be a little more positive.
1. No matter who we run it will be a step up.
2. Dump isn't picking up any votes.
3. God murders thousands of Fox viewers every day.
4. An insurgency always has more energy than defense of the status quo.
mookie1995
there's a good buck in that racket.
Re: 2020 Democrat Challengers Part II: There Can Be Only One
Did y’all see what tD recommended to ergodan?
Get ready for corrupt results and fraud charges
Did y’all see what tD recommended to ergodan?
Get ready for corrupt results and fraud charges
- Status