XYZ - are the rankings an opinion or do they base them on the numbers?
BTW - the underlying numbers are found at the bottom of THIS PAGE
Last edited:
USCHO Fan Forum
This is a sample guest message. Register a free account today to become a member! Once signed in, you'll be able to participate on this site by adding your own topics and posts, as well as connect with other members through your own private inbox!
-
The USCHO Fan Forum has migrated to a new plaform, xenForo. Most of the function of the forum should work in familiar ways. Please note that you can switch between light and dark modes by clicking on the gear icon in the upper right of the main menu bar. We are hoping that this new platform will prove to be faster and more reliable. Please feel free to explore its features.
2017 NCAA tournament selection thread
- Thread starter joecct
- Start date
XYZ - are the rankings an opinion or do they base them on the numbers?
BTW - the underlying numbers are found at the bottom of THIS PAGE
Re: 2017 NCAA tournament selection thread
Not True
There will be teams with AQ's NOT RANKED
Not True
There will be teams with AQ's NOT RANKED
Birdwatcher
Registered User
Re: 2017 NCAA tournament selection thread
Not really....there are more than likely auto bids that are not here
Not really....there are more than likely auto bids that are not here
Birdwatcher
Registered User
Re: 2017 NCAA tournament selection thread
In the words of Porky Pig....... Th..Th..Th..at's All Folks
In the words of Porky Pig....... Th..Th..Th..at's All Folks
Birdwatcher
Registered User
Re: 2017 NCAA tournament selection thread
Middlebury took Norwich int OT twice and Skidmore beat Norwich in OT....Nope...not convinced...LOL
Middlebury took Norwich int OT twice and Skidmore beat Norwich in OT....Nope...not convinced...LOL
Birdwatcher
Registered User
Re: 2017 NCAA tournament selection thread
That number 11 means nothing...the only rankings that count are the regional rankings...polls mean nothing
That number 11 means nothing...the only rankings that count are the regional rankings...polls mean nothing
Re: 2017 NCAA tournament selection thread
Pretty fair rankings IMO, strength of schedule is something that plays quite a bit into these, plus quality wins, bad losses, etc. All these could change though within a few weeks with conference tourneys rapidly approaching. Nice to see Utica up there plus rival Hobart. Final batches of regular season games coming up, quite the season it's been. Excited to see all of the conference tourneys and NCAA's soon. Best of luck to all teams out there.
Pretty fair rankings IMO, strength of schedule is something that plays quite a bit into these, plus quality wins, bad losses, etc. All these could change though within a few weeks with conference tourneys rapidly approaching. Nice to see Utica up there plus rival Hobart. Final batches of regular season games coming up, quite the season it's been. Excited to see all of the conference tourneys and NCAA's soon. Best of luck to all teams out there.
Birdwatcher
Registered User
Re: 2017 NCAA tournament selection thread
Norwich SOS is .505 / Oswego SOS is .505 and Endicott is .538 (although I don't know how) That is all that is on the sheets this week other than W/L percentage and Oswego falls behind both.
Norwich SOS is .505 / Oswego SOS is .505 and Endicott is .538 (although I don't know how) That is all that is on the sheets this week other than W/L percentage and Oswego falls behind both.
Last edited:
cetihcra
New member
Re: 2017 NCAA tournament selection thread
Record vs. Ranked doesn't apply until next week.
Oz's SOS is exactly the same as NU, .505. Endicott is .538.
r
Record vs. Ranked doesn't apply until next week.
Oz's SOS is exactly the same as NU, .505. Endicott is .538.
r
PSUChamps2001
Member of the REAL Zoo Crew
Re: 2017 NCAA tournament selection thread
<TABLE> <tr><td> TEAM </TD><TD> WIN % </TD><TD> SOS </TD><TD> RNK </TD></TR>
<tr><td> NORWICH </TD><TD> 0.881 </TD><TD> 0.505 </TD><TD> 0.750 </TD></TR>
<tr><td> OSWEGO </TD><TD> 0.804 </TD><TD> 0.505 </TD><TD> 0.700 </TD></TR>
<tr><td> AMHERST </TD><TD> 0.605 </TD><TD> 0.536 </TD><TD> 0.700 </TD></TR>
<tr><td> WILLIAMS </TD><TD> 0.659 </TD><TD> 0.534 </TD><TD> 0.500 </TD></TR>
<tr><td> UTICA </TD><TD> 0.708 </TD><TD> 0.516 </TD><TD> 0.500 </TD></TR>
<tr><td> HOBART </TD><TD> 0.739 </TD><TD> 0.526 </TD><TD> 0.500 </TD></TR>
<tr><td> ENDICOTT </TD><TD> 0.8 </TD><TD> 0.538 </TD><TD> 0.500 </TD></TR>
<tr><td> PLATTSBURGH </TD><TD> 0.63 </TD><TD> 0.513 </TD><TD> 0.400 </TD></TR>
<tr><td> HAMILTON </TD><TD> 0.762 </TD><TD> 0.502 </TD><TD> 0.333 </TD></TR>
<tr><td> BABSON </TD><TD> 0.643 </TD><TD> 0.547 </TD><TD> 0.333 </TD></TR>
<tr><td> GENESEO </TD><TD> 0.717 </TD><TD> 0.495 </TD><TD> 0.167 </TD></TR> </TABLE>
<TABLE> <tr><td> TEAM </TD><TD> WIN % </TD><TD> SOS </TD><TD> RNK </TD></TR>
<tr><td> NORWICH </TD><TD> 0.881 </TD><TD> 0.505 </TD><TD> 0.750 </TD></TR>
<tr><td> OSWEGO </TD><TD> 0.804 </TD><TD> 0.505 </TD><TD> 0.700 </TD></TR>
<tr><td> AMHERST </TD><TD> 0.605 </TD><TD> 0.536 </TD><TD> 0.700 </TD></TR>
<tr><td> WILLIAMS </TD><TD> 0.659 </TD><TD> 0.534 </TD><TD> 0.500 </TD></TR>
<tr><td> UTICA </TD><TD> 0.708 </TD><TD> 0.516 </TD><TD> 0.500 </TD></TR>
<tr><td> HOBART </TD><TD> 0.739 </TD><TD> 0.526 </TD><TD> 0.500 </TD></TR>
<tr><td> ENDICOTT </TD><TD> 0.8 </TD><TD> 0.538 </TD><TD> 0.500 </TD></TR>
<tr><td> PLATTSBURGH </TD><TD> 0.63 </TD><TD> 0.513 </TD><TD> 0.400 </TD></TR>
<tr><td> HAMILTON </TD><TD> 0.762 </TD><TD> 0.502 </TD><TD> 0.333 </TD></TR>
<tr><td> BABSON </TD><TD> 0.643 </TD><TD> 0.547 </TD><TD> 0.333 </TD></TR>
<tr><td> GENESEO </TD><TD> 0.717 </TD><TD> 0.495 </TD><TD> 0.167 </TD></TR> </TABLE>
Last edited:
Birdwatcher
Registered User
Re: 2017 NCAA tournament selection thread
I am thinking a lot of changes next week after looking at the sheets.
I am thinking a lot of changes next week after looking at the sheets.
bakdraft21
Well-known member
Re: 2017 NCAA tournament selection thread
thought maybe Genny would be higher and maybe a bone for Buff st,I will not even get into all the sos and krach and the rest of the #'s, just sayin...p.s. Endicott is a funny one to figure out,as I said before they have 5 or 6 D1 transfers that are producing,but after that not sure,if they play a team like Oswego/Norwich who goes 4 lines deep not sure who comes out on top??...as for the tie to Norwich,it was the first game of the year,as we all know A LOT changes as the season goes on...A LOT.....after checking their roster they do look like they have a young team and will be around for awhile,also cant figure out their sos,looks like they play all/mostly cupcakes???
thought maybe Genny would be higher and maybe a bone for Buff st,I will not even get into all the sos and krach and the rest of the #'s, just sayin...p.s. Endicott is a funny one to figure out,as I said before they have 5 or 6 D1 transfers that are producing,but after that not sure,if they play a team like Oswego/Norwich who goes 4 lines deep not sure who comes out on top??...as for the tie to Norwich,it was the first game of the year,as we all know A LOT changes as the season goes on...A LOT.....after checking their roster they do look like they have a young team and will be around for awhile,also cant figure out their sos,looks like they play all/mostly cupcakes???
Last edited:
CARDS_rule_the_Burgh
Nate LePage, Siena '13
Re: 2017 NCAA tournament selection thread
Endicott Men and Women are both ranked. Who would've predicted that in October?
Endicott Men and Women are both ranked. Who would've predicted that in October?
Re: 2017 NCAA tournament selection thread
Both rankings are dubious at best. I am seriously wondering whether there is an error in the Endicott men's SOS calculation. How can they possibly have that high an SOS with that schedule?
Both rankings are dubious at best. I am seriously wondering whether there is an error in the Endicott men's SOS calculation. How can they possibly have that high an SOS with that schedule?