If ASU joins, it's very likely only until an arena solution is worked out. Absent a long term commitment from ASU, adding Simon Fraser would be foolhardy at best.
Screw 'em then. I don't want the WCHA treated as a stepping stone. If their long-term plan is to be an affiliate member of the B1G, they can play as an independent until they have a suitable arena.
Does the WCHA have a team buyout for leaving?
Absent a long term commitment from ASU, adding Simon Fraser would be foolhardy at best.
Why do you say that?
What does Simon Fraser add to the league? A marketable brand name? No. You might as well have Arkansas-Monticello. Another costly flight for most of the league? Yes. The hassles of international travel for a group of 30 of varying nationalities? Yes. The only plus is that WCHA Coaches who recruit BC and specifically the Vancouver area could get recruits to a game. If you get ASU long term, then a western pod or division becomes doable and could result in some travel reduction, but if it's only SF, do they bring enough value to offset the cost? It's also unlikely that they would be able to bring the Alaska/Hawai'i exemption.
I guess I see it a bit differently. I see SFU as a strategic add, should their D1 dream come to fruition. You talk about brand names, well the WCHA has no national brand names currently so I don't see how SFU damages that. It would automatically get the WCHA exposure in a city (Vancouver) that is insane for hockey, more so than any other WCHA market. It helps with exposure to players in the Pacific Northwest which, while not a super fertile recruiting ground does produce some D1 players (we have a couple of Washington kids on our roster). It also gives the NCAA some kind of presence in a region where the WHL has a monopoly.
Selfishly, it gives UAF and UAA a road trip that is a short nonstop flight to Seattle and a quick bus hop up to Burnaby.
Men's Ice Hockey APR, 2014-2015
[four-year rolling avg.: 2011-12, 2012-13, 2013-14 and 2014-15]
WCHA:
Bowling Green, 998
Ferris, 994
Mankato, 988
Bemidji, 981
Anchorage, 979
UAF, 976
UAH, 976
LSSU, 975
NMU, 970
MTU, 966
http://www.ncaa.org/about/resources/research/division-i-academic-progress-rate-apr
Times are changing at Michigan Tech. We went from being the perennial doormats of playing hockey to the perennial doormats of graduating hockey players. I guess if the kids come to Tech to play hockey and then leave as soon as they are done playing hockey that is up to them.Men's Ice Hockey APR, 2014-2015
[four-year rolling avg.: 2011-12, 2012-13, 2013-14 and 2014-15]
MTU, 966 (Last)
Times are changing at Michigan Tech. We went from being the perennial doormats of playing hockey to the perennial doormats of graduating hockey players. I guess if the kids come to Tech to play hockey and then leave as soon as they are done playing hockey that is up to them.
Ryan J
Correct me if I'm wrong, but aren't all of those scores, for the whole league pretty dang good when compared with college athletics as a whole? What kind of reference is there to use to make sense of what they mean? What does "990" tell us?
I would love to see the number for a top level D-I basketball program. With half their team leaving after one or two years, every year, there is either a major loop hole or they roster a ton of kids that never play to get the numbers up.930 represents an approximate graduation rate of 50% and is the cutoff for potential penalties by NCAA.
<img src="http://www.ncaa.org/sites/default/files/2016APRWorks_20160420.jpg">
One hundred votes per day...Clearly the NHL didn't learn anything from the NHL All-Star voting process.You can vote 50x on your phone and 50x online per day for each emails address.