Re: 2015 Pairwise Discussion & Predictions
Playing with Tony/Grant's tool, I get these results:
For Minnesota and Wisconsin to be on opposite sides of the bracket, either UND needs to win the WCHA, which renders UM 2nd and Wisco 4th, or Wisconsin advances to the final (and loses) and Harvard does not, or (Wisconsin, anyone other than BC and anyone other than Harvard) all win their conferences.
There is seemingly no way to get any changes in the top 4 teams, although order can change between MN/BC and HU/UW.
Nothing is settled in seeding among BU, QU and CCT
North Dakota cannot get in without winning their tourney.
Playing with Tony/Grant's tool, I get these results:
For Minnesota and Wisconsin to be on opposite sides of the bracket, either UND needs to win the WCHA, which renders UM 2nd and Wisco 4th, or Wisconsin advances to the final (and loses) and Harvard does not, or (Wisconsin, anyone other than BC and anyone other than Harvard) all win their conferences.
There is seemingly no way to get any changes in the top 4 teams, although order can change between MN/BC and HU/UW.
Nothing is settled in seeding among BU, QU and CCT
North Dakota cannot get in without winning their tourney.
Last edited: