What's new
By:
USCHO Fan Forum

This is a sample guest message. Register a free account today to become a member! Once signed in, you'll be able to participate on this site by adding your own topics and posts, as well as connect with other members through your own private inbox!

  • The USCHO Fan Forum has migrated to a new plaform, xenForo. Most of the function of the forum should work in familiar ways. Please note that you can switch between light and dark modes by clicking on the gear icon in the upper right of the main menu bar. We are hoping that this new platform will prove to be faster and more reliable. Please feel free to explore its features.

2015-2016 Division I Women's Hockey Scores & Results

Re: 2015-2016 Division I Women's Hockey Scores & Results

UND ties UW with a power play goal by Becca Kohler. Great discipline and awareness by Layla Marvin to stop herself from going for the rebound, Kohler had a better chance at it and Marvin stopped herself before she took Kohler's shot away.

15 minutes remaining.
 
Last edited:
Re: 2015-2016 Division I Women's Hockey Scores & Results

Very unfortunate way to end the game. Kayla Gardner takes a kneeing penalty with a minute and a half left, and and Emily Clark scores a few seconds later with a great snipe.

I could see them calling the penalty but not much intent by Gardner. Pretty incidental, and you could easily argue you want more than that for a penalty in a tie game with 1:30 to go.

ENG Pankowski.

Give both teams a lot of credit. Esp UND playing as aggressively as they did and pushing UW to the limit.
 
Last edited:
Re: 2015-2016 Division I Women's Hockey Scores & Results

KTDC said:
Esp UND playing as aggressively as they did and pushing UW to the limit.
Click to expand...

With the John Wooden quote "be quick, but don't hurry" in mind, ND had a way of making the Badgers look "hurried" all weekend. Without Desbiens, it could have been a *much* different weekend. FWIW, she gets my vote for the Kazmaier.

As far as that late penalty goes, I was sitting even with the blue line away from the ND defensive zone, where the penalty happened. It was the trailing ref who called it and he was pretty much even with me and along 'my' boards when he did. The puck came to Burke, she started to move with it generally towards the goal, and then she went down. I looked to the ref, he hesitated another beat or two before his hand went up. So he clearly considered not making the call, and then decided 'no, I gotta call that one'.
 
Last edited:
Re: 2015-2016 Division I Women's Hockey Scores & Results

robertearle said:
I looked to the ref, he hesitated another beat or two before his hand went up. So he clearly considered not making the call, and then decided 'no, I gotta call that one'.
Click to expand...
Sometimes when the call is made after a hesitation, it's because the crowd called it. Saw that many times in Duluth.
 
Re: 2015-2016 Division I Women's Hockey Scores & Results

ARM said:
Sometimes when the call is made after a hesitation, it's because the crowd called it. Saw that many times in Duluth.
Click to expand...
Anytime, every time a Bulldog player fell down.
 
Re: 2015-2016 Division I Women's Hockey Scores & Results

Final from Appleton

Clarkson 6 SLU 1

Goals by Bannon, Mariani, Mercer, Vinkle, Howe and Fournier
Assists by Howe (3), Mariani and Ambrose with 2 each
 
Re: 2015-2016 Division I Women's Hockey Scores & Results

BC is totally outplaying Harvard, already 3-0 with just over 5 to go in the 1st period.
 
Re: 2015-2016 Division I Women's Hockey Scores & Results

5-0 after 1. At the risk of hyperbole that was maybe the best 20 minutes I've ever seen BC play in my 10 years of watching them. WOOOOOOOOO

EDIT: By the way, the first 4 goals had neither Skarupa and Carpenter on the scoresheet; BC's depth has started to show in spades the last several weeks.

I am VERY PLEASED.
 
Re: 2015-2016 Division I Women's Hockey Scores & Results

TonyTheTiger20 said:
5-0 after 1. At the risk of hyperbole that was maybe the best 20 minutes I've ever seen BC play in my 10 years of watching them. WOOOOOOOOO

EDIT: By the way, the first 4 goals had neither Skarupa and Carpenter on the scoresheet; BC's depth has started to show in spades the last several weeks.

I am VERY PLEASED.
Click to expand...

Yeah. They look very good. Its kind of hard to tell because Harvard doesn't look good at all...falling down and such. In terms of battles, speed, passes, BC looks equivalent to a top western club when they're on.
 
Re: 2015-2016 Division I Women's Hockey Scores & Results

5mn_Major said:
Yeah. They look very good. Its kind of hard to tell because Harvard doesn't look good at all...falling down and such. In terms of battles, speed, passes, a top western club, when they are on, looks the looks equivalent to BC.
Click to expand...

Fixed your post ;) . I'm surprised Grant did not get this one.
 
Re: 2015-2016 Division I Women's Hockey Scores & Results

Final BC 8-0. A good old fashioned take em out back behind the woodshed beat down.
 
Re: 2015-2016 Division I Women's Hockey Scores & Results

Much better game in the nightcap:

Northeastern 3, Boston University 2
 
Re: 2015-2016 Division I Women's Hockey Scores & Results

Some thoughts on last night's BC win... BC the better team obviously, but I think Harvard should not be written off.

First, they came off a difficult Q/Princeton weekend. BC had motivation and were rested after an off weekend. If you watched the Harvard weekend, that top line got tons of time, especially the game against Q with TV time outs that let coach Stone shorten her lines. I think that top line was overplayed and just didn't have the gas for this game, but indeed were still good.

Secondly, if you watched the first period, while BC did make life difficult for Harvard, the Crimson did have scoring opportunities that they didn't convert and some not reflected in the shot count. From the Eagles perspective, they must have been surprised that 4 of those goals got in the net. The goals:

1. One goal a strange bouncing puck from long range that should have been stopped.
2. Another was a flubbed tie-up by Masch that got loose somehow and banged in. Just trap the puck Masch!
3. Another goal where Carpenter was allowed to skate behind two defensemen who were busy looking at the shooter at the point - she banged home the rebound.
4. A shot from the point that Masch didn't track.
5. The fifth goal was after a significant attack by the Crimson in the Eagles end, and in transition, a beautifully converted 3 on 2 (which every student of hockey should watch).

I think once Harvard was down 5-0 and Masch was pulled, it was white flag time.

This reminds me of the BU-Q game where BU lost 6-1. BU had to travel to Vermont for the weekend, and then with one day of rest, had to get back on the bus to CT for a game against Q at 11 AM on a Tuesday. I think a "normal" game would have been closer.

The point? BC is better than Harvard, but not by that score. Those thinking Harvard is in the midst of total collapse are likely wrong. The Crimson will still be a dangerous team in the ECAC playoffs.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top