Re: 2014-15 College Football Part II: SEC vs World
Considering how much E$PN played on the whole playoff thing, that would never work. How else are they going to fill 30 min a DAY plus 3 hours on Saturday talking college football- it's not as if they can actually report on teams and conferences outside of the top 25 and Power 5. So they have to talk about polls that don't mean anything.
Otherwise the UM-Notre Dame game would have been as meanless then as it ended up turning out to be now. (argh)
This is the issue. I get that people like to have talking points during the last half of the season, but perhaps a better approach would be to have the committee simply have a group of teams "in the mix" or "contenders" and not have numerical rankings (that is what the polls are for anyway). That might start out at 15-20 teams midway through the season, but it would have dwindled down to 6-8 by the final selection show. It would give the committee some wiggle room to avoid what looks like an absurd result (TCU dropping 3 spots after crushing Iowa State), yet it would still give the talking heads plenty to debate about during the season.
Considering how much E$PN played on the whole playoff thing, that would never work. How else are they going to fill 30 min a DAY plus 3 hours on Saturday talking college football- it's not as if they can actually report on teams and conferences outside of the top 25 and Power 5. So they have to talk about polls that don't mean anything.
Otherwise the UM-Notre Dame game would have been as meanless then as it ended up turning out to be now. (argh)