What's new
USCHO Fan Forum

This is a sample guest message. Register a free account today to become a member! Once signed in, you'll be able to participate on this site by adding your own topics and posts, as well as connect with other members through your own private inbox!

  • The USCHO Fan Forum has migrated to a new plaform, xenForo. Most of the function of the forum should work in familiar ways. Please note that you can switch between light and dark modes by clicking on the gear icon in the upper right of the main menu bar. We are hoping that this new platform will prove to be faster and more reliable. Please feel free to explore its features.

2014-15 College Football Part II: SEC vs World

Re: 2014-15 College Football Part II: SEC vs World

That makes Bama 0/2 in trying to dismantle the athletic departments of their sister schools!
 
Re: 2014-15 College Football Part II: SEC vs World

Finally finished my NCAAF Pairwise. Here's what would have been the Top Ten on the day of the playoff selections:

1. Alabama - 127 - .6768
2. Florida St. - 126 - .6674
3. Ole Miss - 123 - .6557
4. Oregon - 123 - .6471
5. Auburn - 122 - .6570
6. Miss St - 122 - .6466
7. TCU - 119 - .6226
8. Boise - 118 - .6231
9. Baylor -117 - .6077
10. Ga Tech -116 - .6207

OSU finished 11, MSU at 15.

Unfortunately, it looks like the computers have an SEC bias. Due to about a third of the schedule of hockey and double the teams, this really ends up being polarized by certain variables depending on what you're comparing. Just based on the lack of crossover and whatnot I think this ends up being a better comparison for teams within conferences rather than the nation as a whole, but I'm going to tweak it a little bit to see if I can rid it of its pro-SEC anti-B1G bias.

One thing I may look at is the RPI multipliers. I went with the regular 25x50x25. For adjusted win percentage I followed the basketball model as they have similar winning percentages, so it's .6 for a home win, 1.4 for an away win, and 1.4 losses for home, .6 away. This obviously helped Ole Miss, as two of their three losses were on the road and they had a very strong schedule in terms of opponent's schedules.

I may also add an FCS component. Currently it only compares FBS vs FBS games, but that was when I was going to use someone else's RPI. After learning that the website is simply called RPI and their football ranking is only an index and not actual RPI, I decided to make my own. This actually ends up helping teams who play FCS schools, because they do not get the SOS weakener added in. However, I don't want to have to track the schedules of every FCS team and calculate all their stats, so what I may do is is simply create a team named "FCS" who ends up playing like 120 games. Since FCS schools are generally considered auto-wins no matter the opponent (NDSU one of the few exceptions) I don't think it will compromise the data if teams playing FCS end up with an opponent with a record of 7-113 or whatever it may end up being, because in actuality that ends up being the equivalent of playing Georgia St or UMass.

Edit: Errors are fun! Accidently had Miss St beating Bama, they should be 8 and TCU and Boise should move up one spot each.
 
Last edited:
Back
Top