Re: 2012 Elections - Fear is the mind killer. Fear is the little death....
It seems to me that it is the relative rate of expansion of the federal government compared to the growth rate of the economy or of the population. If growth in government employment exceeds population growth, then more people are being supported by fewer people (basic math). If the size of the government budget is growing faster than GNP, then the government is consuming a larger share of resources, which means again by basic math that there is less left to go around for everyone else (A+B=100%, if A grows, B shrinks).
It may well be the case that it is not an issue of "left" or "right." Depending upon your viewpoint, it might be a good thing ("put those nasty capitalists in their place!!") or it might be a bad thing ("cancer cells do the same thing to a body"); it might be an issue of individual liberty; it might be a purely non-dogmatic economic consideration ("too little government can be a problem; too much government is definitely unhealthy!, there is some optimal range").
Thanks - that makes sense, though Kepler's point is well-taken.
My confusion stems from the fact that I don't see expansion of the federal government in terms of right and left. I see it as an institutional outcome (see Mo Fiorina) more than an ideological one. I wish it were different - or, at least, that I believed differently. But I don't.
It seems to me that it is the relative rate of expansion of the federal government compared to the growth rate of the economy or of the population. If growth in government employment exceeds population growth, then more people are being supported by fewer people (basic math). If the size of the government budget is growing faster than GNP, then the government is consuming a larger share of resources, which means again by basic math that there is less left to go around for everyone else (A+B=100%, if A grows, B shrinks).
It may well be the case that it is not an issue of "left" or "right." Depending upon your viewpoint, it might be a good thing ("put those nasty capitalists in their place!!") or it might be a bad thing ("cancer cells do the same thing to a body"); it might be an issue of individual liberty; it might be a purely non-dogmatic economic consideration ("too little government can be a problem; too much government is definitely unhealthy!, there is some optimal range").