What's new
USCHO Fan Forum

This is a sample guest message. Register a free account today to become a member! Once signed in, you'll be able to participate on this site by adding your own topics and posts, as well as connect with other members through your own private inbox!

  • The USCHO Fan Forum has migrated to a new plaform, xenForo. Most of the function of the forum should work in familiar ways. Please note that you can switch between light and dark modes by clicking on the gear icon in the upper right of the main menu bar. We are hoping that this new platform will prove to be faster and more reliable. Please feel free to explore its features.

2012 D1 BCS thread

Status
Not open for further replies.
Re: 2012 D1 BCS thread

Taking into consideration the history of Rutgers football, any winning season should be viewed as a success. You'd think with the amount of talent in that area, they'd have a better history.
 
Re: 2012 D1 BCS thread

Taking into consideration the history of Rutgers football, any winning season should be viewed as a success. You'd think with the amount of talent in that area, they'd have a better history.
You'd think, but for the longest time, all the good players who wanted to stay "local" would go to Penn State or Maryland or Pitt or Syracuse or BC. And you couldn't blame them either; Rutgers had been bad for SO LONG (basically the whole '80s and '90s) that if you're Chris Simms or Neil O'Donnell or Tony Siragusa or Plaxico Burress or Ron Dayne, if you were serious about football as a career, Rutgers wasn't really an option. Schiano took over with the stated goal of recruiting the best local guys, but it was largely through recruiting contacts he'd made in Florida during his time at Miami that he started building the decent teams of 2003-05, and it wasn't until Brian Leonard and Ray Rice wound up at Rutgers instead of Syracuse that the tide started to turn on local guys. Even so, they still aren't getting the top guys, and you still can't really blame them for going to powers like Ohio State or Florida when you don't really know what the future will hold for Rutgers.
 
Re: 2012 D1 BCS thread

Great post, jmh.

Syracuse used to dominate the mid 80s-late 90s because they recruit Florida. They would pick off all of the kids that couldn't make it a UF/The U/FSU. They'd get the kids in Cali that wouldn't make it on Pac 10 teams. The worst thing that happened to the program was when South Florida became a D1 program. That took the kids that would've went to Syracuse. If you have the option to play in sunny Tampa over the land of lake effect. You'll take USF 9 times out of 10.
 
Re: 2012 D1 BCS thread

I'm surprised UCF wasn't able to do what USF did. They were in FBS level five years before USF and in the same conference for a few years. Not to mention they have a giant student enrollment.

Side note: Why is USF called USF? They're nowhere near the south of florida. If anything they should be UWF.
 
Re: 2012 D1 BCS thread - Be VERY careful or I'll go all Priceless on you.

Re: 2012 D1 BCS thread - Be VERY careful or I'll go all Priceless on you.

Central Florida screwed up and joined the MAC, and crapped the bed in their 2-3 years there rather than dominate. That made USF more attractive in 2003-05 to the Big East than UCF, so UCF got to wait until next year to join the Big East.
 
Re: 2012 D1 BCS thread

I'm surprised UCF wasn't able to do what USF did. They were in FBS level five years before USF and in the same conference for a few years. Not to mention they have a giant student enrollment.

Side note: Why is USF called USF? They're nowhere near the south of florida. If anything they should be UWF.
Because there's already a UWF. In Pensecola. So unless they could get them to switch to say Florida Panhandle, they're kind of left with USF. Unless they want to work in something like Florida Gulfside perhaps.
 
Re: 2012 D1 BCS thread

Because there's already a UWF. In Pensecola. So unless they could get them to switch to say Florida Panhandle, they're kind of left with USF. Unless they want to work in something like Florida Gulfside perhaps.

There is already a Florida Gulf Coast University in Fort Meyers, so Florida Gulfside would be confusing.

Regarding the name...if Wikipedia is to be believed, USF was the southernmost public university in Florida when it was named in 1957. It also states that other names considered were "Citrus State University," "Sunshine State University," "The University of the Western Hemisphere," and "The University of Florida at Temple Terrace".

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/University_of_South_Florida
 
Re: 2012 D1 BCS thread

There is already a Florida Gulf Coast University in Fort Meyers, so Florida Gulfside would be confusing.

Regarding the name...if Wikipedia is to be believed, USF was the southernmost public university in Florida when it was named in 1957. It also states that other names considered were "Citrus State University," "Sunshine State University," "The University of the Western Hemisphere," and "The University of Florida at Temple Terrace".

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/University_of_South_Florida

I would have gone with Sunshine State University and offered a major in hugs and rainbows.
 
Re: 2012 D1 BCS thread

There is already a Florida Gulf Coast University in Fort Meyers, so Florida Gulfside would be confusing.

Regarding the name...if Wikipedia is to be believed, USF was the southernmost public university in Florida when it was named in 1957. It also states that other names considered were "Citrus State University," "Sunshine State University," "The University of the Western Hemisphere," and "The University of Florida at Temple Terrace".

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/University_of_South_Florida

Well if that was the case: Good choice, USF.

And I completely forgot about the MAC and UCF. Wasn't that about the time Marshall was still decent?
 
Re: 2012 D1 BCS thread

Well if that was the case: Good choice, USF.

And I completely forgot about the MAC and UCF. Wasn't that about the time Marshall was still decent?

Yeah. The MAC had finally caught up in football support in the last couple years before Marshall left for CUSA, where they no longer have that edge and win 4-6 games a year. Of course, as soon as Marshall left, the MAC stopped its momentum and went from having 3 10 wins teams in 2003 to crap for most of the 2000's.
 
Re: 2012 D1 BCS thread

Well, we all knew this was coming eventually.

<iframe width="560" height="315" src="http://www.youtube.com/embed/gfzCkatPlU0" frameborder="0" allowfullscreen></iframe>

<iframe width="560" height="315" src="http://www.youtube.com/embed/FSvVwylGtes" frameborder="0" allowfullscreen></iframe>
 
Re: 2012 D1 BCS thread

It blunted the rise of "Call me Maybe" marching band productions, so it's not a complete fail.
 
Re: 2012 D1 BCS thread

Well, we all knew this was coming eventually.

<iframe width="560" height="315" src="http://www.youtube.com/embed/gfzCkatPlU0" frameborder="0" allowfullscreen></iframe>

<iframe width="560" height="315" src="http://www.youtube.com/embed/FSvVwylGtes" frameborder="0" allowfullscreen></iframe>

Well the Ohio one makes the Oregon one look like complete crap.
 
Re: 2012 D1 BCS thread - Be VERY careful or I'll go all Priceless on you.

Re: 2012 D1 BCS thread - Be VERY careful or I'll go all Priceless on you.

This was a response the ESPN Big Ten blog mailbag that made me laugh:

Current Brian Bennett: On Sept. 27, you receive an email from a Minnesota fan wondering if beating Iowa would mean anything and if the team would have to wait until it played Northwestern in a possible battle of unbeatens to get a true measuring stick of its worth.

Past Brian Bennett: (Head explodes).
 
Re: 2012 D1 BCS thread - Be VERY careful or I'll go all Priceless on you.

Re: 2012 D1 BCS thread - Be VERY careful or I'll go all Priceless on you.

Never mind. I found it.
 
Last edited:
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top