Arnold's 2 months older than Bjugstad. Fact is, Arnold has a significantly better shot than Bjugstad, and so do dozens of others across the college hockey landscape, including a handful in the WCHA alone. Again, Bjugstad is a great player, but he doesn't even come close to having the best shot in his own league, let alone college hockey.
You really need to learn to drop an argument buddy
I may be wrong, and it wouldn't be the first time, but I am going to stand by my opinion until Bjugstad plays a full year healthy. I get it, you don't agree with me. That's fine.
I don't understand how you came to the conclusion that Zengerle is a more complete player than Bjugstad, but I certainly think you're entitled to that opinion.
I am not really interested in getting into a full blown debate on any of this as I have a long day of travel ahead. I'll leave it at this. I think Bjugstad is the best player in the WCHA, and just might be the best player in the NCAA. I think he finishes higher than Zengerle in the Hobey voting and is my preseason pick for the award.
Fortunately the sun should not get too much in your eyes with those maroon and gold colored glasses that you have on, buddy.![]()
I hardly think only Gopher fans share that opinion. But you're free to think what you like.
I'd take B-jugs everyday and twice on Sunday over Bill Arnold.
Do you realize what the argument even is?![]()
Good Lord. I thought when he who will not be named left this crap was over.
IMO, Zengerle is more like Gretzky, while Bjugstad is more like Brendan Shanahan (not suggesting that Zengerle is the greatest player of all-time, just type of game that I think each is akin to).
I would say Zengerle is more like Jari Kurri and Bjugstad a Mario Lemieux who plays defense (again, loose comparisons).
I have yet to see/hear/read/etc. one non-Gopher fan that believes that Bjugstad has the best shot in college hockey. Your hyperbole of this kid is slowly reaching into Chuck Norris/Bill Brasky territory.
But go ahead, keep drinking the kool-aid.
I would say that Zengerle is more like Denis Savard and Bjugstad is more like Shane Churla.
Hope that helps!
Great thread...
Do you realize what the argument even is?![]()
Reading back through it there were a few points being argued, but focused on shots later. And I would argue that it is more subjective than just scoring percentage. What defines the best shot? I would say a combo of accuracy, power, quickness and versatility of release. Each person is going to place varying emphasis on different variables though. Scoring percentage is as much a function of slot selection and opportunity as ability, so I don't think it is the end all determining factor for who has the best shot (some guys shoot when there isn't anything there and others generally only shoot when they see something). Bjugstad has a pretty dang good shot. I can't say how it rates to others, but can't say I saw a lot last year that impressed me as much as some of his.
Ryan Potulny and Vanek had better shots than any I saw last year though.