What's new
By:
USCHO Fan Forum

This is a sample guest message. Register a free account today to become a member! Once signed in, you'll be able to participate on this site by adding your own topics and posts, as well as connect with other members through your own private inbox!

  • The USCHO Fan Forum has migrated to a new plaform, xenForo. Most of the function of the forum should work in familiar ways. Please note that you can switch between light and dark modes by clicking on the gear icon in the upper right of the main menu bar. We are hoping that this new platform will prove to be faster and more reliable. Please feel free to explore its features.

2010-2011 NHL Season Part II - Concussions Are Serious Business, Savvy?

Status
Not open for further replies.
Re: 2010-2011 NHL Season Part II - Concussions Are Serious Business, Savvy?

J.D. said:
Didn't look like Lundqvist or Tortorella complained. Those are always tough calls on when to blow the whistle.
Click to expand...
True. It was definitely one of those where you want a quick whistle if it's your goalie and a slow whistle if it's your forward. Net definitely wasn't off though.
 
Re: 2010-2011 NHL Season Part II - Concussions Are Serious Business, Savvy?

Why would Washington's announcers pick their player of the game with overtime still underway?
 
Re: 2010-2011 NHL Season Part II - Concussions Are Serious Business, Savvy?

bronconick said:
Why would Washington's announcers pick their player of the game with overtime still underway?
Click to expand...

I've seen the Bruins do play of the game in the 2nd period...my guess is the agreement with whoever is sponsoring it.
 
Re: 2010-2011 NHL Season Part II - Concussions Are Serious Business, Savvy?

Like I was saying about defensive zone giveaways... :mad:
 
Re: 2010-2011 NHL Season Part II - Concussions Are Serious Business, Savvy?

J.D. said:
Was thinking Kyle Turris might be a bust, but ****, what a snipe that was.
Click to expand...

First reaction: Argh, come on, Jimmy.

On replay: Dayum, what a shot. And the Wings . . . their backchecking is not so good sometimes.
 
Re: 2010-2011 NHL Season Part II - Concussions Are Serious Business, Savvy?

Haven't followed the Ducks at all this year, but just checked the box score from last night and see they featured a lineup with:

Brad Winchester
Jarkko Ruutu
George Parros
Sheldon Brookbank
 
Re: 2010-2011 NHL Season Part II - Concussions Are Serious Business, Savvy?

Rangers played alright, but they miss Callahan. He would've made a difference last night. Unless they get Hank some help, it's not going to last past 5 games.
 
Re: 2010-2011 NHL Season Part II - Concussions Are Serious Business, Savvy?

Listening to WAAF this morning on my way back from a test and the host was reminding Bruins fans to be classier than Habs fans: don't throw stuff, don't call 911, etc. Not sure if it was in jest or not, but the series could get interesting.
 
Re: 2010-2011 NHL Season Part II - Concussions Are Serious Business, Savvy?

amherstblackbear said:
First reaction: Argh, come on, Jimmy.

On replay: Dayum, what a shot. And the Wings . . . their backchecking is not so good sometimes.
Click to expand...

Yeah, Howard was pretty darn solid when he had to be; on the whole, Detroit's team defense is average at best. Lidstrom is at a point in the twilight of his career where he's still pretty good, but no longer godlike enough to offset the mistakes of two other players.

This whole series is going to be about getting pucks by Bryzgalov early and often, since his play is likely going to be the deciding factor in whether this series is over in 5 games, or goes the full 7.
 
Re: 2010-2011 NHL Season Part II - Concussions Are Serious Business, Savvy?

J.D. said:
Haven't followed the Ducks at all this year, but just checked the box score from last night and see they featured a lineup with:

Brad Winchester
Jarkko Ruutu
George Parros
Sheldon Brookbank
Click to expand...

Puttin' on the foil, coach!
 
Re: 2010-2011 NHL Season Part II - Concussions Are Serious Business, Savvy?

<iframe title="YouTube video player" width="480" height="390" src="http://www.youtube.com/embed/CzYtDhlmgJg" frameborder="0" allowfullscreen></iframe>

Lets Go Bruins eh?
 
Re: 2010-2011 NHL Season Part II - Concussions Are Serious Business, Savvy?

On the subject of nostalgia, Bruins-Canadiens in the playoffs makes me think of:
131t.jpg


Don't get me wrong - I'm not complaining about being able to see the game in Virginia in HD.:)
 
Re: 2010-2011 NHL Season Part II - Concussions Are Serious Business, Savvy?

NMU8405 said:
<iframe title="YouTube video player" width="480" height="390" src="http://www.youtube.com/embed/CzYtDhlmgJg" frameborder="0" allowfullscreen></iframe>

Lets Go Bruins eh?
Click to expand...

That brings back memories of adjusting the old UHF antenna "just right" on the b&w tv so I could watch (through the snow) Bobby, Derek, Phil, Chief, etc fly up and down the ice. Gosh they were fun to watch. Imagine if the technology of scoping knees was around in 1970 :mad:
 
Re: 2010-2011 NHL Season Part II - Concussions Are Serious Business, Savvy?

john g said:
That brings back memories of adjusting the old UHF antenna "just right" on the b&w tv so I could watch (through the snow) Bobby, Derek, Phil, Chief, etc fly up and down the ice. Gosh they were fun to watch. Imagine if the technology of scoping knees was around in 1970 :mad:
Click to expand...

I wasnt around then, but I am old enough to remember WSBK, Fred Cusick and Sanderson. One of my favorite memories growing up as a kid.
 
Re: 2010-2011 NHL Season Part II - Concussions Are Serious Business, Savvy?

Figured today would be a good day to post this. I made this last year right after getting home from the Garden.

<iframe title="YouTube video player" width="640" height="375" src="http://www.youtube.com/embed/EFDPRd7SNDE?hd=1" frameborder="0" allowfullscreen></iframe>
 
Re: 2010-2011 NHL Season Part II - Concussions Are Serious Business, Savvy?

This team better show up in the third. Im not impressed so far by Boston.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top