What's new
USCHO Fan Forum

This is a sample guest message. Register a free account today to become a member! Once signed in, you'll be able to participate on this site by adding your own topics and posts, as well as connect with other members through your own private inbox!

  • The USCHO Fan Forum has migrated to a new plaform, xenForo. Most of the function of the forum should work in familiar ways. Please note that you can switch between light and dark modes by clicking on the gear icon in the upper right of the main menu bar. We are hoping that this new platform will prove to be faster and more reliable. Please feel free to explore its features.

2009-2010 Official Vermont Season Thread

Status
Not open for further replies.
Re: 2009-2010 Official Vermont Season Thread

Grantfan you are way out there. Sneddon is the best thing this program has seen in decades. Look at what he has done year after year. Complain about improvement and look at stalbergs improvement last year and irwin this year.

Yeah the PP has been perennially weak but that is my only valid complaint. He is feilding a legitimate top 20 program recently and that is likely to continue and possibly improve..

Recruiting continues to improve. We have raised our expectations from low or mid ecac pack to top half HE. Ill take it

The fact that Grantfan even had a bad thought regarding Sneddon and his coaching shows how little he knows about anything.

2nd best coach in Hockey East.
 
Last edited:
Re: 2009-2010 Official Vermont Season Thread

It is easy to blame things on lack of effort. I think the loss at Maine was a lack of effort, I'm not sure if the loss at Merrimack was an effort thing, maybe it was. Those are the only two games that I would explain as lack of effort.

But I do not think lack of effort has been a major part of this team's problems to date. I think the 7-1 BC loss was goaltending with a lot of help from the defense. Remember, that embarrassment began as a 1-1 tie in a period in which the Cats played better than fine, that is, the effort was there. The UMass embarrassment was penalty killing, or more properly, being killed by the penalty kill. That 6-2 embarrassment turned a 2-1 lead into a loss in eight quick, painless minutes, so the effort had been there. The effort was there in the loss at Denver. Even in games where the team began "flat" or had to weather the other team's early onslaught - the 4-1 BC win, Yale the other night - the team managed to stay in the game and summon the effort and guts to win.

I think the explanation for the team's erratic and inconsistent play is largely, not exclusively but largely the erratic play of the defense. (Let us try to forget special teams.) The big, veteran defense was anticipated to be the backbone of the team in light of the loss of forwards Stalberg, Lenes, Strong, and Carlson, but it has often been awful. Aside from only Kyle Medvec and Anders Franzon, they have hurt the team badly with immature play, monumental mistakes and an abundance of penalties. That is my explanation for the Catamounts' play to this point in the season. Even in the shutout of Yale, the defense allowed Mike Spillane to be severely tested with no margin for error. Breakaways are not a sign of thinking defense first.

I do not expect much difference from the defense playing the rest of the season. My hope is for just competence from the defense, the level of goaltending we have seen in the last three games from both goalies, for more of the penalty killing we saw against a very good Yale powerplay, for the forwards to play up to their abilities and as they have in Denver and against BC, and for the powerplay to go on a nice little multi-game stretch of success despite the coaches' impatience.

I still think this Catamounts team can be right at or near the top of Hockey East, should compete for the League championship and should earn their way into the NCAA Tournament.

This weekend can be a huge one for the Cats. At some point, a team has to make a statement. The Cats need to just be better than a talented but flailing BU team and then beat the current League leaders at home if they are going to fight for top spots. Coming off two hard-fought wins, this is a great and important time for this team to make its statement.
 
Re: 2009-2010 Official Vermont Season Thread

I still think this Catamounts team can be right at or near the top of Hockey East, should compete for the League championship and should earn their way into the NCAA Tournament.

What more could a UVM fan want ? I guess you were not around during the Non St. Louis, Perrin, Thomas ECAC years. Now that was a tough stretch.
 
Re: 2009-2010 Official Vermont Season Thread

That's what I believe this group of recruited and walk-on players is capable of. I watch to see if they will, and hope they do, under the guidance of their coaches, reach what I believe to be their potential. They can reach their potential, I can be wrong about their potential or they can fail to reach their potential.

I've seen enough to still think I am not overestimating their potential and I've seen enough to wonder if they will reach their potential.

Last year was very exciting and I would love to watch this team do it again.
 
Re: 2009-2010 Official Vermont Season Thread

Hey I might be a outsider but was a good fan the last 4 yrs while Corey played. My observation: Without Snedden last years team never would have saw a Frozen Four. Yes it was defensive hockey most of the last 4 years but in my humble opinion it worked. Granted offensively last years team really came on and Stallberg had a huge season. Strongs numbers went down but who cared. What a two way player. Rollie, Vock, Milo, and others all put in big timely goals. I remember so many 1 goal games the last 4 yrs I believe due to Defensive Hockey. But UVM found a way to win a lot of those games. Kudos Mr. Sneddon. Also remember one thing this is a whole new season with different chemistry. I believe in Sneddon and this team will be just fine. Snwbrdr, MSL Fan, Cat Lover and all the rest of the UVM fans. Great fans out there! Go Cats! Go Bulldogs!
 
Re: 2009-2010 Official Vermont Season Thread

It is easy to blame things on lack of effort. I think the loss at Maine was a lack of effort, I'm not sure if the loss at Merrimack was an effort thing, maybe it was. Those are the only two games that I would explain as lack of effort.

But I do not think lack of effort has been a major part of this team's problems to date. I think the 7-1 BC loss was goaltending with a lot of help from the defense.. The UMass embarrassment was penalty killing, or more properly, being killed by the penalty kill. That 6-2 embarrassment turned a 2-1 lead into a loss in eight quick, painless minutes, so the effort had been there. .


I think your missing the key point, yes the PK has absolutely killed the cats. But what is important is why they are on the PK......LACK OF EFFORT. Those holding calls...because someone wasn't skating hard, being lazy, and had to get a stick on his man. Those big losses came as a result of that kind of effort. Our defensemen can not be lazy, can not be taking these types of penalties.
 
Re: 2009-2010 Official Vermont Season Thread

Agree on weak pk and being on the pk too much. Last year they were not a highly penalized club. They need to get back to that and start to pot some pp goals.

Who plays in net friday?

Hopefully stacey is back
 
Re: 2009-2010 Official Vermont Season Thread

Does a shutout not get Mike Spillane another game and still maintain a healthy rotation?
 
Re: 2009-2010 Official Vermont Season Thread

Agree on weak pk and being on the pk too much. Last year they were not a highly penalized club. They need to get back to that and start to pot some pp goals.

Who plays in net friday?

Hopefully stacey is back


Seems the rotation has been Madore in game 1 and Spillane the following game. And given that Madore played well against BU last year, I am guessing he gets the start at BU and Spillane plays against UNH.
 
Re: 2009-2010 Official Vermont Season Thread

Surprised to see us picked to beat bu and then lose to unh at home

I probably would have flipped those picks

Two ties would not surprise me either
 
Re: 2009-2010 Official Vermont Season Thread

Surprised to see us picked to beat bu and then lose to unh at home

I probably would have flipped those picks

Two ties would not surprise me either

I don't know. It makes sense to me, UVM has played well against BU (4-2-1 at Agganis) and BU so far this year has struggled. They are 1-0-2 in the last 3 but that win was against Harvard, which is not really a powerhouse, so I think picking a win against BU makes sense.

Picking UNH to win makes some sense too. First off they have owned UVM since the beginning of time. This year they are playing well in conference, and are first place in HE.

Connelly picked right of standings:

# 4 UVM against #10 BU ---> UVM
# 4 UVM against #1 UNH ---> UNH

Not sure why that is really a surprise especially when you couple with the fact that a.) UVM plays well at Agganis and b.) UNH always wins.
 
Re: 2009-2010 Official Vermont Season Thread

I think bu is getting it going

I think unh is not as good as their record and uvm usully bounces back but agree that unh has owned them too much
 
Re: 2009-2010 Official Vermont Season Thread

I'll take it!!

Would have liked them to hold the lead but it was nice to see them gut out the OT and kill the PP, kinda a reverse of the UML game.

Well on the bright side the Cats are done with games in Boston for the rest of the regular season and they did it going 2-1-1, not to shabby.

And now comes a 7 game homestand, 3 league games wrapped around 4 OOC games.
 
Re: 2009-2010 Official Vermont Season Thread

Was at the game this evening.

UVM was very lucky to skate off with a tie. The Terriers looked great from the 2nd period on, with nice size, good passing, and some great forechecking.

Not as an excuse, but I thought the game was horribly officiated. Lots let go, than a cheap call was made time and again. I did not have the best of seats (low on one end so poor vision to the far end of the rink) but felt that Jack got the home town calls most of the night.

Power play was unable to penetrate the BU d. They were kept outside with no real chances to bang in rebounds.
 
Re: 2009-2010 Official Vermont Season Thread

You have to be happy with a 3-3 tie against BU anytime, but tough to let a 3-1 lead slip away. Didn't get to see the game, but reading the live blog and articles from today sounds like BU pretty much dominated UVM. In the end the only thing that matters is the final score, but points are important and while UVM managed to get one, two was possible and reasonable.

Sounds like Madore played pretty well, coupled with the NU game lets hope he has turned the corner. While Spillane will give Rob some competition, Madore will be the UVM goaltender for the next few years.

Let's hope this squad takes it as a loss and picks it up for UNH. All the teams in this league are pretty even and who wins this game will come down to who shows up to play.
 
Re: 2009-2010 Official Vermont Season Thread

Sounds like a weak effort from the cats. Disappointing.

Very nice to see mcCarthy and Pacan score again though. They may be the team goal leaders by the end of the year. Need some of the upperclassmen to step up.
 
Re: 2009-2010 Official Vermont Season Thread

Funny, sometimes they play pretty well and can't seem to put the puck in the net. Last night, it sounds like they got their lunch handed to them, and they score enough to come away with a point. I'll take the point, but their play is disappointing. We need to regroup and come away with 2 on Sunday. I'm kinda looking forward to having Spillane in the net.
 
Re: 2009-2010 Official Vermont Season Thread

Sounds like so many of the Cats games in the past versus the old big 4. Vermont used to come out and play well but not get a goal and then the other team scores on the first good chance they get and then it would go downhill from there. Nice be be able to get points on the road when not playing at your best.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top