What's new
USCHO Fan Forum

This is a sample guest message. Register a free account today to become a member! Once signed in, you'll be able to participate on this site by adding your own topics and posts, as well as connect with other members through your own private inbox!

  • The USCHO Fan Forum has migrated to a new plaform, xenForo. Most of the function of the forum should work in familiar ways. Please note that you can switch between light and dark modes by clicking on the gear icon in the upper right of the main menu bar. We are hoping that this new platform will prove to be faster and more reliable. Please feel free to explore its features.

2009-2010 NHL Season Part 3: After The Gold Rush

Status
Not open for further replies.
Re: 2009-2010 NHL Season Part 3: After The Gold Rush

The BJs prove that at this time of the year, no one goes down without a fight.

Unless you're the Bruins, apparently.
 
Re: 2009-2010 NHL Season Part 3: After The Gold Rush

They can't score. Also, I'm glad Tim Thomas got that big contract.:rolleyes:

:D :D :D

Ahh I love it how its all come full circle. Tim Thomas seriously might be the biggest one hit wonder since Brady Anderson and the worst Vezina trophy winner ever.
 
Re: 2009-2010 NHL Season Part 3: After The Gold Rush

Dude, I never liked him. There have been a few one hit wonders.
 
Re: 2009-2010 NHL Season Part 3: After The Gold Rush

:D :D :D

Ahh I love it how its all come full circle. Tim Thomas seriously might be the biggest one hit wonder since Brady Anderson and the worst Vezina trophy winner ever.

Yeah seriously dude, we have Wade Redden and Chris Drury. If you eliminated just ONE of those guys from our team (preferably Redden) and just had half of that cap space to work with, the Rangers would probably be a playoff team with the addition.
 
Re: 2009-2010 NHL Season Part 3: After The Gold Rush

Wade Redden makes $8 million a year.

Yeah seriously dude, we have Wade Redden and Chris Drury. If you eliminated just ONE of those guys from our team (preferably Redden) and just had half of that cap space to work with, the Rangers would probably be a playoff team with the addition.

I didn't say Sather and the Rangers were any better.

I completely agree that the Redden and Drury contracts have completely handicapped the team from becoming a real contender.

Redden especially. Drury yes he makes too much but he's still a player I like to have on the team. I didn't understand the Redden signing from the beginning.

The Rangers will not be a good team again until they can get rid of Redden and Roszival's contracts.
 
Re: 2009-2010 NHL Season Part 3: After The Gold Rush

:D :D :D

Ahh I love it how its all come full circle. Tim Thomas seriously might be the biggest one hit wonder since Brady Anderson and the worst Vezina trophy winner ever.

I'm ripping off AMC on this because it fits all too well here.

glasshouse1.jpg


No, Prezde, don't do it!

BH-0208.jpg


Now you've done it.

89155812_3be71c63fd.jpg
 
Re: 2009-2010 NHL Season Part 3: After The Gold Rush

Could the Bruins be a more boring team? Is it possible? They need to blow up the team and start over again. Good god.

That would be consistent with the "Let's Do What Montreal Does One Year Later" model they seem to be following.

-Play way above their heads and win the Eastern Conference's top seed? CHECK
-Have a letdown in the Conference Semis and lose to a team they were expected to beat? CHECK.
-Enter the year with ridiculously high expectations, their fans even uttering the phrase "Serious Cup Contenders" with a straight face? CHECK
-Get wracked with injuries and disappointing performances from guys who played way better the year before? CHECK
-Barely make the playoffs? CHECK (probably)
-Get smoked in the first round of the playoffs and end the season in embarrassing fashion? Remains to be seen.
-Blow up the team and bring in several new players? Remains to be seen.

I'd bet against the B's blowing things up to the extent of Montreal. But the other resemblance to the Habs in their fortunes over a 2 year period is (up to this point) pretty much dead-on.
 
Re: 2009-2010 NHL Season Part 3: After The Gold Rush

That would be consistent with the "Let's Do What Montreal Does One Year Later" model they seem to be following.

-Play way above their heads and win the Eastern Conference's top seed? CHECK
-Have a letdown in the Conference Semis and lose to a team they were expected to beat? CHECK.
-Enter the year with ridiculously high expectations, their fans even uttering the phrase "Serious Cup Contenders" with a straight face? CHECK
-Get wracked with injuries and disappointing performances from guys who played way better the year before? CHECK
-Barely make the playoffs? CHECK (probably)
-Get smoked in the first round of the playoffs and end the season in embarrassing fashion? Remains to be seen.
-Blow up the team and bring in several new players? Remains to be seen.

I'd bet against the B's blowing things up to the extent of Montreal. But the other resemblance to the Habs in their fortunes over a 2 year period is (up to this point) pretty much dead-on.
I remember talking to Bruins fans last year who thought they could win the cup... I laughed and said not in a million years. Oh well.:(
 
Re: 2009-2010 NHL Season Part 3: After The Gold Rush

That would be consistent with the "Let's Do What Montreal Does One Year Later" model they seem to be following.

-Play way above their heads and win the Eastern Conference's top seed? CHECK
-Have a letdown in the Conference Semis and lose to a team they were expected to beat? CHECK.
-Enter the year with ridiculously high expectations, their fans even uttering the phrase "Serious Cup Contenders" with a straight face? CHECK
-Get wracked with injuries and disappointing performances from guys who played way better the year before? CHECK
-Barely make the playoffs? CHECK (probably)
-Get smoked in the first round of the playoffs and end the season in embarrassing fashion? Remains to be seen.
-Blow up the team and bring in several new players? Remains to be seen.

I'd bet against the B's blowing things up to the extent of Montreal. But the other resemblance to the Habs in their fortunes over a 2 year period is (up to this point) pretty much dead-on.

Our best offensive player this year is name "Patrice". Cue ominous music...
 
Re: 2009-2010 NHL Season Part 3: After The Gold Rush

That would be consistent with the "Let's Do What Montreal Does One Year Later" model they seem to be following.

-Play way above their heads and win the Eastern Conference's top seed? CHECK
-Have a letdown in the Conference Semis and lose to a team they were expected to beat? CHECK.
-Enter the year with ridiculously high expectations, their fans even uttering the phrase "Serious Cup Contenders" with a straight face? CHECK
-Get wracked with injuries and disappointing performances from guys who played way better the year before? CHECK
-Barely make the playoffs? CHECK (probably)
-Get smoked in the first round of the playoffs and end the season in embarrassing fashion? Remains to be seen.
-Blow up the team and bring in several new players? Remains to be seen.

I'd bet against the B's blowing things up to the extent of Montreal. But the other resemblance to the Habs in their fortunes over a 2 year period is (up to this point) pretty much dead-on.

More parallels: Michael Ryder in the chateau bow-wow. He was moved down to the fourth line in practice today. Another well-spent $4 million a year there. After they sent Morris back to Phoenix they talked about how they "misjudged" his ability. Gee, what could the Bruins have used his $3.5 million dollars for? I don't know, maybe Phil Kessel.

The Bruins are so unbelievably sloppy with money it's hilarious. They also gave Joe Colborne $1.1 million a year for his entry level two-way contract. Uhhh... Guys?
 
Re: 2009-2010 NHL Season Part 3: After The Gold Rush

More parallels: Michael Ryder in the chateau bow-wow. He was moved down to the fourth line in practice today. Another well-spent $4 million a year there. After they sent Morris back to Phoenix they talked about how they "misjudged" his ability. Gee, what could the Bruins have used his $3.5 million dollars for? I don't know, maybe Phil Kessel.

The Bruins are so unbelievably sloppy with money it's hilarious. They also gave Joe Colborne $1.1 million a year for his entry level two-way contract. Uhhh... Guys?

Not as sloppy as the Rangers though.

It amazes me how the Rangers sign guys to ridiculous contracts and then teams like the Penguins get Staal locked up for 4 million a year and the Canucks get Kelser for 5 million.

Those are the kind of guys I want on my team yet we give Roszival 5 million and Redden 8 million. Genius.

The only players the Rangers are getting their bang for buck for are Lundqvist, Gaborik, Prospal, Staal and Christensen.
 
Re: 2009-2010 NHL Season Part 3: After The Gold Rush

Not as sloppy as the Rangers though.

It amazes me how the Rangers sign guys to ridiculous contracts and then teams like the Penguins get Staal locked up for 4 million a year and the Canucks get Kelser for 5 million.

Those are the kind of guys I want on my team yet we give Roszival 5 million and Redden 8 million. Genius.

The only players the Rangers are getting their bang for buck for are Lundqvist, Gaborik, Prospal, Staal and Christensen.

You were able to find a sucker for Scott Gomez' insanely inflated price tag. The guy has been a pretty good player for MTL, but not nearly worth what he's being paid.
 
Re: 2009-2010 NHL Season Part 3: After The Gold Rush

You were able to find a sucker for Scott Gomez' insanely inflated price tag. The guy has been a pretty good player for MTL, but not nearly worth what he's being paid.

Honestly, I don't know what the Canadians' GM was smoking that day. While Higgins didn't exactly work out, I don't know how the Rangers managed to get McDonagh AND Higgins for Gomez and some prospects. Talk about a lopsided deal.
 
Re: 2009-2010 NHL Season Part 3: After The Gold Rush

Honestly, I don't know what the Canadians' GM was smoking that day. While Higgins didn't exactly work out, I don't know how the Rangers managed to get McDonagh AND Higgins for Gomez and some prospects. Talk about a lopsided deal.

And they leveraged that freed up cap space to get their only offensive player, Marian Gaborik.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top