What's new
By:
USCHO Fan Forum

This is a sample guest message. Register a free account today to become a member! Once signed in, you'll be able to participate on this site by adding your own topics and posts, as well as connect with other members through your own private inbox!

  • The USCHO Fan Forum has migrated to a new plaform, xenForo. Most of the function of the forum should work in familiar ways. Please note that you can switch between light and dark modes by clicking on the gear icon in the upper right of the main menu bar. We are hoping that this new platform will prove to be faster and more reliable. Please feel free to explore its features.

2009-2010 NHL Playoffs Thread Part II: Dan Boyle's fate rests in the balance...

Status
Not open for further replies.
Re: 2009-2010 NHL Playoffs Thread Part II: Dan Boyle's fate rests in the balance...

And Pittsburgh answers soon after. Cooke on a scrum in front of the net, about the 3rd or 4th whack at it.

3-1
 
Re: 2009-2010 NHL Playoffs Thread Part II: Dan Boyle's fate rests in the balance...

If your own man (Orpik) causes the net to come off, can't they award the goal anyway because he knocked Cullen into the net?
 
Re: 2009-2010 NHL Playoffs Thread Part II: Dan Boyle's fate rests in the balance...

Net off the moorings, no goal. Scotiabank isn't a happy place.

Gonchar gets a penalty on the no-goal. Just pop another one in Sens.
 
Re: 2009-2010 NHL Playoffs Thread Part II: Dan Boyle's fate rests in the balance...

Now don't freak out Ottawa, still have a power play, don't let the Pens take any momentum out of this.
 
Re: 2009-2010 NHL Playoffs Thread Part II: Dan Boyle's fate rests in the balance...

mookie1995 said:
whew!

from tba's lips to God's ear :p
Click to expand...

Hey... anybody want to read NHL Rule 63.6.

Oh, wait, I forgot... we don't use the regular book when it involves the Pens.
 
Re: 2009-2010 NHL Playoffs Thread Part II: Dan Boyle's fate rests in the balance...

Patman said:
Hey... anybody want to read NHL Rule 63.6.

Oh, wait, I forgot... we don't use the regular book when it involves the Pens.
Click to expand...

tba's word is good (this time);)
 
Re: 2009-2010 NHL Playoffs Thread Part II: Dan Boyle's fate rests in the balance...

mookie1995 said:
tba's word is good (this time);)
Click to expand...

I think it would be hard to say that Orpik put Cullen into the net to displace it intentionally AND the shot had taken place AND the shot was on net.

Part 1 would be the hardest, Part 2 not hard and Part 3 is a slam dunk.

But Part 1 is the hardest to prove, and I believe he did it intentionally, whether he was doing it to prevent a potential goal for counting or not, that's up to your biases.
 
Re: 2009-2010 NHL Playoffs Thread Part II: Dan Boyle's fate rests in the balance...

mookie1995 said:
ha.

i'm not even watching!!!

i knew after the OT game that they would lose tonight and i have no interest in investing the effort nor emotion to see them lose. it will be bad enough tuesday for game 7.
Click to expand...

Actually, its not based on intent, but simply says "the defending player's actions dislodge the net."

Good goal. All the refs looked at was whether the net was off instead of looking at WHY the net was off so: No goal.
 
Re: 2009-2010 NHL Playoffs Thread Part II: Dan Boyle's fate rests in the balance...

mookie1995 said:
ha.

i'm not even watching!!!

i knew after the OT game that they would lose tonight and i have no interest in investing the effort nor emotion to see them lose. it will be bad enough tuesday for game 7.
Click to expand...

Might be time to climb back on the bandwagon. ;)
 
Re: 2009-2010 NHL Playoffs Thread Part II: Dan Boyle's fate rests in the balance...

Ugh, Matt Farking Cooke with his second to lead the comeback charge and tie it at 3.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top