What's new
USCHO Fan Forum

This is a sample guest message. Register a free account today to become a member! Once signed in, you'll be able to participate on this site by adding your own topics and posts, as well as connect with other members through your own private inbox!

  • The USCHO Fan Forum has migrated to a new plaform, xenForo. Most of the function of the forum should work in familiar ways. Please note that you can switch between light and dark modes by clicking on the gear icon in the upper right of the main menu bar. We are hoping that this new platform will prove to be faster and more reliable. Please feel free to explore its features.

115th Congress: On Permanent Vacation

Status
Not open for further replies.
Re: 115th Congress: On Permanent Vacation

It is crazy...we could fund education for everyone at all levels on that kind of cash.

I was reading the Nazi Times ...err New York Times and this part really made me laugh...



Voodoo economics at its finest. Using the wrong numbers to try and prove things add up. (and even then they dont)

He continues:



Now admittedly I am not a math person...but .03 seems to significantly less than .4.

And this guy isnt some flaming liberal socialist...he was an Economic Adviser to flipping Dubya!

Doesn't Trump like to brag about going to Wharton and being an Ivy Leaguer? Shouldn't he be reviewing his alma mater's study?

Oh that's right, the guy is a fraud who got in thanks to daddy's donations, then probably bribed the nerds to do his assignments for him.
 
Re: 115th Congress: On Permanent Vacation

Worked well in Oklahoma right? The amount of districts on 4 day weeks shouldnt scare anyone away from this amirite?

In ten years Canada will be able to buy us for pennies on the dollar! Better brush on your metric system eh ;)

Ontario annexes Michigan and Manitoba annexes Minnesota. Let's do this! I'll draw up the papers for PM Trudeau to review by the middle of next week.
 
Re: 115th Congress: On Permanent Vacation

They want a tax cut for their billionaire donors, who will give them some cushy position once they leave office. It's not hard to understand, they're just greedy and greed runs this country, been true for at least 40 years.

Question I have, doesn't this bill need to be deficit neutral (I think that's the term) before it can be voted on? I know they're planning to gut certain programs etc. and there is other voodoo economics involved but how is that gonna be achieved exactly?

According to what I read as long as it stays at $1.5 trillion dollars over 10 years they are fine. Anything beyond that and the Byrd Rule takes effect.

Good Article Here
 
Re: 115th Congress: On Permanent Vacation

When they were told they couldn't get a trigger, did they instinctively start to yell about their 2nd Amendment rights?
 
Re: 115th Congress: On Permanent Vacation

Just take money away from Medicare and Social Security, and be done with it. Make Dump's core voting base feel the pain. They need a good whipping.
 
Re: 115th Congress: On Permanent Vacation

Just take money away from Medicare and Social Security, and be done with it. Make Dump's core voting base feel the pain. They need a good whipping.

I believe because they are doing it through Reconciliation they cannot touch Social Security or it violates the Byrd Rule.

Per the Vox article I linked earlier:

1. The provision must change federal spending or revenue.

2. If the bill does not meet the budget resolution’s instructions to reduce the federal deficit, any provision that results in either increased spending or decreased revenue is removed until it does meet those targets.

3. The provision must only affect policies that fall under the jurisdiction of the specific committees that were instructed in the budget resolution.

4, The provision’s effect on spending or revenues must be more than incidental to its policy impact.

5. The provision cannot increase the federal deficit at some point in the future, beyond the typical 10-year “budget window” that is used to evaluate legislation.

6. The provision cannot change Social Security.

I told you all the triggers would be the undoing if anything did it. The more they have to fix the more problems it creates. They cant please everyone and the more they try to the more they alienate others. Same issue with the Health Care Bill...

Tomorrow could be fun no matter how it plays out :D

note: The Byrd Rule can be violated if the Parliamentarian allows it but my guess is the GOP knows that aint happening.
 
Last edited:
Re: 115th Congress: On Permanent Vacation

<blockquote class="twitter-tweet" data-lang="en"><p lang="en" dir="ltr">Republicans Senators are working hard to pass the biggest Tax Cuts in the history of our Country. The Bill is getting better and better. This is a once in a generation chance. Obstructionist Dems trying to block because they think it is too good and will not be given the credit!</p>— Donald J. Trump (@realDonaldTrump) <a href="https://twitter.com/realDonaldTrump/status/936555753946705920?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">December 1, 2017</a></blockquote>
<script async src="https://platform.twitter.com/widgets.js" charset="utf-8"></script>
 
Re: 115th Congress: On Permanent Vacation

I know people who voted for him. I know people who support him. I don't get it.
 
Re: 115th Congress: On Permanent Vacation

It is coming down to crunch time. According to CNN the GOP needs one of Flake, Collins or Corker to flip or the bill fails. Problem is to get Flake and Corker back they need to find a way to put back the money ($350 billion or so according to Lindsay Graham) they lost when the triggers were negated per Senate rules. Pretty much every idea they have (especially ones that have to do with Corporate Taxes) to replace that money will tick off others in the caucus.

Collins seems to only want to vote Yes if they help ObamaCare after the individual mandate is repealed. (along with state and local exemptions still allowed in specific situations) That would cause issues in Conference Committee since the House wants none of that.

This is going to be very very close.
 
Re: 115th Congress: On Permanent Vacation

It is coming down to crunch time. According to CNN the GOP needs one of Flake, Collins or Corker to flip or the bill fails.

Who are the two sure no votes already then?

Edit: never mind, I misread your post.
 
Last edited:
Re: 115th Congress: On Permanent Vacation

It is coming down to crunch time. According to CNN the GOP needs one of Flake, Collins or Corker to flip or the bill fails. Problem is to get Flake and Corker back they need to find a way to put back the money ($350 billion or so according to Lindsay Graham) they lost when the triggers were negated per Senate rules. Pretty much every idea they have (especially ones that have to do with Corporate Taxes) to replace that money will tick off others in the caucus.

Collins seems to only want to vote Yes if they help ObamaCare after the individual mandate is repealed. (along with state and local exemptions still allowed in specific situations) That would cause issues in Conference Committee since the House wants none of that.

This is going to be very very close.

Individual Mandate repeal is the destruction of Obamacare. Which, apparently, is morally repugnant.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top