Re: 0 Days Since Last Shooting: Keep The Calendar At Zero
Do not compare gun studies validating the danger of guns...with the junk from John Lott:
Bought and paid for by gun industry: Per WSJ, John Lott's research has been paid for by gun manufacturers for years.
Falsifying surveys: Lott claimed to have undertaken a national survey of 2,424 respondents in 1997. However, in 2000 Lott was unable to produce the data or any records showing that the survey had been undertaken and he could not recall the names of any of the students who he said had worked on it.
Wrote positive reviews of his own work - posing as someone else: Lott created and used "Mary Rosh" as a sock puppet to defend his own works on Usenet and elsewhere. After investigative work by blogger Julian Sanchez, Lott admitted to use of the Mary Rosh persona. Sanchez also pointed out that Lott, posing as Rosh, not only praised his own academic writing, but also called himself "the best professor I ever had".
Bad analytics: In 2001, National Academy of Sciences panel considered multiple regression to be not of much use in proving causal arguments in studies by Lott.
This article is a good read concerning gun statistics. TMWDR: Both sides pick and choose the statistics to say whatever they want them to.
EXAMPLE: The only variable that can explain the high rate of mass shootings in America is its astronomical number of guns. This was based on this article but refuted by this one.
Do not compare gun studies validating the danger of guns...with the junk from John Lott:
Bought and paid for by gun industry: Per WSJ, John Lott's research has been paid for by gun manufacturers for years.
Falsifying surveys: Lott claimed to have undertaken a national survey of 2,424 respondents in 1997. However, in 2000 Lott was unable to produce the data or any records showing that the survey had been undertaken and he could not recall the names of any of the students who he said had worked on it.
Wrote positive reviews of his own work - posing as someone else: Lott created and used "Mary Rosh" as a sock puppet to defend his own works on Usenet and elsewhere. After investigative work by blogger Julian Sanchez, Lott admitted to use of the Mary Rosh persona. Sanchez also pointed out that Lott, posing as Rosh, not only praised his own academic writing, but also called himself "the best professor I ever had".
Bad analytics: In 2001, National Academy of Sciences panel considered multiple regression to be not of much use in proving causal arguments in studies by Lott.