What's new
USCHO Fan Forum

This is a sample guest message. Register a free account today to become a member! Once signed in, you'll be able to participate on this site by adding your own topics and posts, as well as connect with other members through your own private inbox!

  • The USCHO Fan Forum has migrated to a new plaform, xenForo. Most of the function of the forum should work in familiar ways. Please note that you can switch between light and dark modes by clicking on the gear icon in the upper right of the main menu bar. We are hoping that this new platform will prove to be faster and more reliable. Please feel free to explore its features.

0 Days Since Last Shooting: Keep The Calendar At Zero

Status
Not open for further replies.
Re: 0 Days Since Last Shooting: Keep The Calendar At Zero

What I actually said, is that if I happened to have facts/studies/etc that stated something I think is true, Scooby would disagree with me. If I said the sky is blue, Scooby would say it's not. It's not about owning Scooby. It's my opinion that he'd disagree with me no matter what I said.

I never said both sides are extremists. Both sides do have SOME extremists, which many agree on that point.

Keep tryin', son.

LOL

Unlike most gun owners I believe 97% of Climate Change Scientists.

Nice try though.
 
Re: 0 Days Since Last Shooting: Keep The Calendar At Zero

You emphatically said I would not listen to science just to disagree with you. That is patently false.

And as previously mentioned, in essence, there are lies, dam lies, and statistics. When it comes down to our opinions, I don't think you'd ever agree with me on anything. *shrug* That's the way I see it.
 
Re: 0 Days Since Last Shooting: Keep The Calendar At Zero

And as previously mentioned, in essence, there are lies, dam lies, and statistics. When it comes down to our opinions, I don't think you'd ever agree with me on anything. *shrug* That's the way I see it.

It used to be just "You're either with us or against us". Now, for an extra added benefit, they'll tell you what you said/meant too. Keep up the fight Brent. I wish you well
 
Re: 0 Days Since Last Shooting: Keep The Calendar At Zero

It used to be just "You're either with us or against us". Now, for an extra added benefit, they'll tell you what you said/meant too. Keep up the fight Brent. I wish you well

I'm not trying to fight here. I'd rather discuss and find common ground.
 
Re: 0 Days Since Last Shooting: Keep The Calendar At Zero

What I actually said, is that if I happened to have facts/studies/etc that stated something I think is true, Scooby would disagree with me. If I said the sky is blue, Scooby would say it's not. It's not about owning Scooby. It's my opinion that he'd disagree with me no matter what I said.

This is some fantastic stuff here. Even though Scooby says he'd listen if you actually came with some facts, you still can just point to the fact that he is just arguing with you about whether or not he'd listen.

The most glaring example I've seen recently on the board of someone completely ignoring facts came from you on taxes Brent. People went through the trouble to explain marginal tax rates which clearly wasn't factored in to your opinion on taxes and you pretty much said, I believe what I believe and packed up your toys and went home. Projection, it's not just for the President.
 
Re: 0 Days Since Last Shooting: Keep The Calendar At Zero

What's the point in posing a hypothetical when the reality is the exact opposite? Scooby has shown that he's receptive to science and Brent's argument is that he could hypothetically show him science and he'd disagree. I'm sorry but I don't know see how that's anything other than low effort trolling at this point. It's like when some random moron on facebook the other day said more or less the same thing but then presented zero actual facts or data to support his argument (that the left is constantly "pulling more stuff" than the right and that's why Acosta deserved to lose his press pass I think...?) and then said I wouldn't be receptive to them no matter what they were. I'm more than happy to read actual scientific findings if he's willing to present them.

The problem is one side of these debates (guns in particular) actually has science and data on their side and the other doesn't. And that's why his posts are so incredibly disingenuous. But by all means defend his ridiculous arguments lmao
 
Re: 0 Days Since Last Shooting: Keep The Calendar At Zero

What's the point in posing a hypothetical when the reality is the exact opposite? Scooby has shown that he's receptive to science and Brent's argument is that he could hypothetically show him science and he'd disagree. I'm sorry but I don't know see how that's anything other than low effort trolling at this point. It's like when some random moron on facebook the other day said more or less the same thing but then presented zero actual facts or data to support his argument (that the left is constantly "pulling more stuff" than the right and that's why Acosta deserved to lose his press pass I think...?) and then said I wouldn't be receptive to them no matter what they were. I'm more than happy to read actual scientific findings if he's willing to present them.

The problem is one side of these debates (guns in particular) actually has science and data on their side and the other doesn't. And that's why his posts are so incredibly disingenuous. But by all means defend his ridiculous arguments lmao

When I present my opinion, I state it's my opinion. Not that difficult to understand.
 
Re: 0 Days Since Last Shooting: Keep The Calendar At Zero

Brent what exact proposals from the "other side" are you arguing won't matter? We can outlaw certain guns and while they won't disappear overnight they will eventually be reduced to a much smaller margin. And since most guns in the hands of criminals are stolen eventually there will be less supply for criminals.

When I present my opinion, I state it's my opinion. Not that difficult to understand.

How about something to validate the opinion instead of coming off uninformed?
 
Re: 0 Days Since Last Shooting: Keep The Calendar At Zero

The full semi-auto ban will never happen, you're correct. The genie is out of the bottle on that one. The country is too big, has too many wide-open spaces, and too many semi-autos already sold. The reaction to the ATF showing up on some otherwise law-abiding hick's doorstep to collect his semi-automatic weapons, just like the NRA bleated at him for years that (((They))) would, is going to be very, very ugly. The NRA would jizz themselves hastening to canonize the "great patriots who stood their ground", or whatever. This would very likely trigger a guerrilla version of Civil War 2.

The problem is, the NRA and their paid-for lackeys in Congress won't give even a single inch on any of the less severe proposals that a vast majority of Americans agree with, such as what has already been discussed here ad nauseam.

This, Slap. This. The BANZ THE GUNZ (or anything similar) is not sustainable or even enforceable.

So, let's ban any mods, go full-on background on all sales, and (this last one is tricky, due to privacy laws) do a double-verified mental health check for any gun owner.

Edit: forgot to add, if convicted of any violent crime, gun rights are taken away.
 
Last edited:
Re: 0 Days Since Last Shooting: Keep The Calendar At Zero

This, Slap. This. The BANZ THE GUNZ (or anything similar) is not sustainable or even enforceable. .

No, not that sorry. They did it elsewhere and while the gun count wasn't the same in Australia for instance that's not the point. And it's an obfuscation to claim the intent of a ban is meant to instantly remove all banned guns from households. Offer buybacks and those that don't want to relinquish them wouldn't have to (at a maximum of 10 years for instance) , but if they fall into the hands of someone else you're effed. None of what you quoted negates what I said and eventually the count significantly dwindles.
 
Re: 0 Days Since Last Shooting: Keep The Calendar At Zero

No, not that sorry. They did it elsewhere and while the gun count wasn't the same in Australia for instance that's not the point. And it's an obfuscation to claim the intent of a ban is meant to instantly remove all banned guns from households. Offer buybacks and those that don't want to relinquish them wouldn't have to (at a maximum of 10 years for instance) , but if they fall into the hands of someone else you're effed. None of what you quoted negates what I said and eventually the count significantly dwindles.
This is a great idea.
Uninformed- do they do a thing where the ballistics of the gun are filed somewhere? Is this a reasonable thing?
 
Re: 0 Days Since Last Shooting: Keep The Calendar At Zero

No, not that sorry. They did it elsewhere and while the gun count wasn't the same in Australia for instance that's not the point. And it's an obfuscation to claim the intent of a ban is meant to instantly remove all banned guns from households. Offer buybacks and those that don't want to relinquish them wouldn't have to (at a maximum of 10 years for instance) , but if they fall into the hands of someone else you're effed. None of what you quoted negates what I said and eventually the count significantly dwindles.

AUS is an island. That helps their cause (water and such as a natural border). Going back to Square 1, is the US's attitude towards guns. That's the biggest key in this whole thing. And buybacks? Ok, Johnny Redneck will sell back 10 of his 15 guns. That's still 5 guns out there (extreme example, but doesn't make it a lie). The idea of going back to revolvers and single shot shotguns/rifles is dead. Will never happen, because as Fade said, we are in too deep at this point.

And if you really want to push, and imprison the gun lawbreakers? Last I heard, prisons are pretty over-crowded right now. Imagine imprisoning the responsible gun owners that violate a newly-passed gun ban.

Also: what les said: if someone's gun that is not stolen (proven) and used in a crime, gun owner is also responsible for abetting.
 
Re: 0 Days Since Last Shooting: Keep The Calendar At Zero

And if you really want to push, and imprison the gun lawbreakers? Last I heard, prisons are pretty over-crowded right now. Imagine imprisoning the responsible gun owners that violate a newly-passed gun ban.

This is an interesting position given your take on illegal immigration. What is it that makes these "responsible" gun owners different? I thought illegal was illegal?
 
Re: 0 Days Since Last Shooting: Keep The Calendar At Zero

This is an interesting position given your take on illegal immigration. What is it that makes these "responsible" gun owners different? I thought illegal was illegal?

So, let's say the banning of all the guns happens tomorrow. John Doe, who has obeyed every single gun law in his life, happens to have a gun after the ban. Boom, done. Arrested. Jailed. Despite the 2nd Amendment, all that jazz. It was in a safe and he forgot about it, I dunno. It was an antique gun that is un-usable and in the attic. Still illegal.

There would be situations like this. My dad was cleaning out his dad's house after his death, and found a safe in the attic with 3 antique guns in there. Completely useless, even the firearms expert said to either display only, or destroy them. NEVER attempt to fire them.
 
Re: 0 Days Since Last Shooting: Keep The Calendar At Zero

AUS is an island. That helps their cause (water and such as a natural border). Going back to Square 1, is the US's attitude towards guns. That's the biggest key in this whole thing. And buybacks? Ok, Johnny Redneck will sell back 10 of his 15 guns. That's still 5 guns out there (extreme example, but doesn't make it a lie). The idea of going back to revolvers and single shot shotguns/rifles is dead. Will never happen, because as Fade said, we are in too deep at this point.

And if you really want to push, and imprison the gun lawbreakers? Last I heard, prisons are pretty over-crowded right now. Imagine imprisoning the responsible gun owners that violate a newly-passed gun ban.

Nothing in your first paragraph negates my hypothetical proposal nor the intent which is reducing the population of a specific list of banned guns. Even if some dude only turns in 10 of 15 that's still at 67% reduction.

If you won't turn your gun in within 10 years of the ban (again per my hypothetical) then you deserve the result if caught. However this doesn't require (not would I implement) law enforcement going door to door Fahrenheit 451 style to have measurable impact.

Also my, "you're effed" comment was more in relation to if a gun you own is stolen and used in a crime and less about if you neglect to turn yours in. Although that too would result in a penalty increasing in severity the longer you keep it.
 
Last edited:
Re: 0 Days Since Last Shooting: Keep The Calendar At Zero

Nothing in your first paragraph negates my hypothetical proposal nor the intent of reducing the population of the banned guns (even if some dude only turns in 10 of 15 that's still at 67% reduction) and if you won't turn your gun in within 10 years of the ban (again per my hypothetical) then you deserve the result if caught. This doesn't require law enforcement going door to door Fahrenheit 451 style.

Also my, "you're effed" comment was more in relation to if a gun you own is stolen and used in a crime and not if you neglect to turn yours in.

If the gun is proven stolen, the owner should not be held responsible. There are many details in that, including was the gun stored properly (on your hip/in a safe, depending on the laws where you live), etc. Not resting on a cupboard or under the bed, etc.

I think with the suggestions I've made, allowing for some tweaks of course, that natural reduction of gun ownership would happen; don't need to outright ban.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top