Deutsche Gopher Fan
Registered User
Don't be so cynical. They could just have not fully read the bill and didn't know what they were voting for.
Not reading the bill is what West Virginia did tonight
Don't be so cynical. They could just have not fully read the bill and didn't know what they were voting for.
For guns, yes, it's all on R. I'm talking any issue. No D or R goes for "what's best." They go for "what will it take for me to keep my job?" Right now it's guns and that issue. Neither "side" is innocent. It makes me sad.
The difference comes down to "the letter C". One is Overt & One is Covert.I doubt I'm any less cynical than you, Brent, but "they all do it" is a cop out. There are huge differences between these two parties right now, and those differences matter.
The difference comes down to "the letter C". One is Overt & One is Covert.
Let's see you try and out-cynical that one
No meaningful difference in degree? To use a sloppy metaphor: All autism is the same, regardless of where the patient falls on the spectrum?
No meaningful difference in degree? To use a sloppy metaphor: All autism is the same, regardless of where the patient falls on the spectrum?
Of course there is a difference in degree. My post was trying be as cynical as possible. However.........let's not kid ourselves here. Just because the Rs have turned corruption into an art form the Ds did not become saints. The lesser of two evils is still evil. The highly functioning autistic is still autistic.
This is sadly true.![]()
For guns, yes, it's all on R. I'm talking any issue. No D or R goes for "what's best." They go for "what will it take for me to keep my job?" Right now it's guns and that issue. Neither "side" is innocent. It makes me sad.
Of course there is a difference in degree. My post was trying be as cynical as possible. However.........let's not kid ourselves here. Just because the Rs have turned corruption into an art form the Ds did not become saints. The lesser of two evils is still evil. The highly functioning autistic is still autistic.
How can you not recall my past posts? Is it because my career output of posts is a bad week for some here?I asked the questions because the "They both do it" lament is used in different contexts. Some use it as a conclusion, a passive defense of conduct they do not want to defend directly. Used that way, it adds nothing to the discussion, since it just states the obvious. "There is corruption on both sides of the aisle" adds nothing to the discussion unless it is followed by a discussion of specifics applicable to the issue at hand. Saying that high functioning autistic is still autistic does nothing to help determine which social situations we should place any one autistic in and under what circumstances.
I don't recall enough of your past posts to know what you meant by your post, buster, so I may be out of line. But it seemed to be a form of false equivalency--an attempt to lump all sinners together. That is increasingly commonplace these days, and it is a very easy but dangerous way for people to avoid exercising judgment.
How can you not recall my past posts? Is it because my career output of posts is a bad week for some here?
I was simply trying to point out that I agreed with Brent. Both sides ARE bad. One side being worse does not make the other good and deserving our praise (or more importantly, our vote). Hell, I've been voting the lesser of two evils for longer than many here have been alive. That being said, at some point (11/16), it reaches at point where the lesser of the two evils is evil enough that I can't accept it.
No meaningful difference in degree? To use a sloppy metaphor: All autism is the same, regardless of where the patient falls on the spectrum?
I'll defend burd here. A couple posts here and there are not enough to understand a poster's style, personality, views overall, etc.
If you were to ask someone, “would you rather have autism on the mild end of the spectrum or the severe end of the spectrum,” most people will respond, “I’d rather not have it at all.” And that’s why fringe candidates can get elected.
Sorry. A poor attempt at joking. (and proving your point at the same time)
The second article proved my point...Trump is already backing off because that stance was a death knell for him if he kept it.
Trump's backing off only in the sense that his views reflect only the views of the last person or group he meets with. As I think it was Handy who said, he's a leaf in the wind.