You forgot the flame thrower.
USCHO Fan Forum
This is a sample guest message. Register a free account today to become a member! Once signed in, you'll be able to participate on this site by adding your own topics and posts, as well as connect with other members through your own private inbox!
-
The USCHO Fan Forum has migrated to a new plaform, xenForo. Most of the function of the forum should work in familiar ways. Please note that you can switch between light and dark modes by clicking on the gear icon in the upper right of the main menu bar. We are hoping that this new platform will prove to be faster and more reliable. Please feel free to explore its features.
0 Days Since Last Shooting: But the Second Amendment!
- Thread starter MissThundercat
- Start date
- Status
You forgot the flame thrower.
Obviously. I’m not quite sure what you would be insuring against though. As I said previously, insurance doesn’t change liability so I’m not sure how insurance would help.
Are we talkin about gun insurance here?
Like car ins, everyone has to buy gun insurance to cover liability if you kill on someone?
Fvcking awesome
Let’s get this done.
I doubt it would cover a deliberate act. You can already file a wrongful death lawsuit now.
Does auto insurance cover a negligent or criminal act??
mookie1995
there's a good buck in that racket.
Re: 0 Days Since Last Shooting: But the Second Amendment!
who says they are deliberate?
and who says car accidents are not?
who says they are deliberate?
and who says car accidents are not?
There is a big difference between criminal and deliberate. I’m not sure on every state, but think most require $25k or below as far as auto liability coverage so doubt the premium would be that much or that awards for wrongful shootings would change much from what they are today. It sounds like a solution looking for a problem.
ScoobyDoo
NPC
Re: 0 Days Since Last Shooting: But the Second Amendment!
Your insuring against me being killed, or injured by your gun. Same as if you were driving a car and hit me as a pedestrian. It's not complicated.
Your insuring against me being killed, or injured by your gun. Same as if you were driving a car and hit me as a pedestrian. It's not complicated.
Do you have any evidence that awards aren’t being paid out right now?
ScoobyDoo
NPC
unofan
Well-known member
Re: 0 Days Since Last Shooting: But the Second Amendment!
Yes, I guarantee there are poor gun owners who have hurt someone and can't afford to pay damages. Just as there are poor car owners who injure others and can't afford to pay them. Hence the requirement to carry liability insurance in the vast majority of states.
Yes, I guarantee there are poor gun owners who have hurt someone and can't afford to pay damages. Just as there are poor car owners who injure others and can't afford to pay them. Hence the requirement to carry liability insurance in the vast majority of states.
unofan
Well-known member
Re: 0 Days Since Last Shooting: But the Second Amendment!
It definitely covers negligence. That's what 99% of auto accidents are and the whole point of the requirement to carry insurance.
It definitely covers negligence. That's what 99% of auto accidents are and the whole point of the requirement to carry insurance.
Last edited:
Re: 0 Days Since Last Shooting: But the Second Amendment!
uno, I know most General Liability forms include intentional acts exclusions, but auto? Not a common issue with auto, since the insured ordinarily must intend the harm, not just the act.
uno, I know most General Liability forms include intentional acts exclusions, but auto? Not a common issue with auto, since the insured ordinarily must intend the harm, not just the act.
St. Clown
Liberal Rebel Scum, apparently
Re: 0 Days Since Last Shooting: But the Second Amendment!
Very few of these shooters have had the type of profiles where you would expect them to have the financial means to pay for a prostitute.
Very few of these shooters have had the type of profiles where you would expect them to have the financial means to pay for a prostitute.
Re: 0 Days Since Last Shooting: But the Second Amendment!
Worth a shot. Puritanism is still f'king with us.
Worth a shot. Puritanism is still f'king with us.
ScoobyDoo
NPC
Re: 0 Days Since Last Shooting: But the Second Amendment!
Would the price come down if it was brought into the light? Or no.
Would the price come down if it was brought into the light? Or no.
ticapnews
Never graduate.
You really think any of them would pay? They expect it for free. They can't fathom why there isn't already a line of women waiting for the honor of servicing them.
St. Clown
Liberal Rebel Scum, apparently
Re: 0 Days Since Last Shooting: But the Second Amendment!
I'm willing to bet that their issues stem from a much different place than that of a huge ego.
I'm willing to bet that their issues stem from a much different place than that of a huge ego.
ticapnews
Never graduate.
It isn't ego. They don't think they're any better than other men, just superior to women. Ladies should not only be servicing them, but be grateful for the opportunity.
It's male chauvinism on steroids.
- Status