What's new
By:
USCHO Fan Forum

This is a sample guest message. Register a free account today to become a member! Once signed in, you'll be able to participate on this site by adding your own topics and posts, as well as connect with other members through your own private inbox!

  • The USCHO Fan Forum has migrated to a new plaform, xenForo. Most of the function of the forum should work in familiar ways. Please note that you can switch between light and dark modes by clicking on the gear icon in the upper right of the main menu bar. We are hoping that this new platform will prove to be faster and more reliable. Please feel free to explore its features.

SCOTUS: sponsored by Harlan Crow

  • Thread starter Thread starter Deutsche Gopher Fan
  • Start date Start date
MissThundercat said:
Anniversary of Obergefell today.

I can't shake the feeling it will be overturned eventually.
Click to expand...
I assume this timeline gets even darker, yes.

It can't just end with Dump exiting. It to be a wholesale repudiation of everything both parties and the corporate media has foisted upon us starting all the way back to JFK or before. It has to be a bursting forth of new thought on the order of the Enlightenment, or the Romantic Era.

Humans don't stay static forever. There will be a revolution of thought. The economic and political revolutions will then follow naturally enough, to correct cognitive dissonance rather than introduce it. Once the New emerges it is already too late for the Old to react.

I assume once we hear about it (again, far too late) we will neither understand nor approve of it, as we will be products of the Old.
 
I just think it's hilarious that his own handpicked appointees are apparently the ones most likely to reign in his more ridiculous arguments, depending on their little pet issues where they aren't in total lockstep with the far right, corporate agenda.

Part of me also wonders if they are doing some behind the scenes horsetrading on these 5-4 decisions so that Dump can't single out any particular one of them.
 
Those decisions are targeted specifically against Dump's tyranny.

The only bad thing is they ought to all have been unanimous. It is a terrifying world when 4 justices are working for our transformation into a one party state because it's their party.

Perhaps a taste of the other way is in order?
 
Last edited:
We know why. Firing and putting your own people on the Fed sets precedent that any POTUS can do it going forward, which causes policy instability, and besides we can't risk having one of those scary pseudo-"socialist" Dems pack the Fed. :rolleyes:

But firing the FTC Chair is cool to ensure your party's propaganda reigns supreme on the airwaves. That is, of course, until a Democrat is POTUS again, and they magically find a way to reverse that decision.
 
FadeToBlack&Gold said:
We know why. Firing and putting your own people on the Fed sets precedent that any POTUS can do it going forward, which causes policy instability, and besides we can't risk having one of those scary pseudo-"socialist" Dems pack the Fed. :rolleyes:

But firing the FTC Chair is cool to ensure your party's propaganda reigns supreme on the airwaves. That is, of course, until a Democrat is POTUS again, and they magically find a way to reverse that decision.
Click to expand...
The Fed apparently was salvaged to have special rules for firing but all the other agencies Trump can fire everybody at will now. 100 years of precedent thrown out. The dumbing down of our country is almost complete, and when it's complete we will truly be the dumbest country on Earth.
 
bsky.app

NPR (@npr.org)

The Supreme Court is expected to make a long-awaited ruling on birthright citizenship today, on the high court's last day of its term. And, the U.S. murder rate approaches a record low. n.pr/3SBb6iZ https://n.pr/3SBb6iZ
bsky.app bsky.app

This one should be pretty hilarious regardless the outcome.
 
unofan said:
Considering they let him fire the FTC chair in a sweeping opinion discussing the unitary executive the same day, this was just the Court saying the Fed is different just because, not that they think Trump is wrong.
Click to expand...

You have me as the source. Fade is the source.
 
bsky.app

Sherrilyn Ifill (@sifill.bsky.social)

I do not think there is sufficient appreciation for how catastrophic yesterday’s decision in Slaughter is for this country. As Justice Sotomayor said in her dissent and she intoned from the bench yesterday, “today the majority reshapes our Govt.”
bsky.app bsky.app

I agree. This is NOT getting enough coverage.
 
Megan Kelly does not understand the difference between a justice and a politician. It's a good thing she didn't go to law school.
 
Kepler said:
Megan Kelly does not understand the difference between a justice and a politician. It's a good thing she didn't go to law school.
Click to expand...
Yes, Megyn Kelly went to law school. She earned her Juris Doctor (J.D.) from Albany Law School in 1995.

Megyn Kelly, a native of Delmar, a suburb of Albany, attended Syracuse University and earned her bachelor's degree in political science. She then went on to Albany Law School to get her J.D. in 1995. After college she worked as a corporate litigator with the law firm Bickel and Brewer in Chicago.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top