What's new
USCHO Fan Forum

This is a sample guest message. Register a free account today to become a member! Once signed in, you'll be able to participate on this site by adding your own topics and posts, as well as connect with other members through your own private inbox!

  • The USCHO Fan Forum has migrated to a new plaform, xenForo. Most of the function of the forum should work in familiar ways. Please note that you can switch between light and dark modes by clicking on the gear icon in the upper right of the main menu bar. We are hoping that this new platform will prove to be faster and more reliable. Please feel free to explore its features.

SCOTUS: sponsored by Harlan Crow

  • Thread starter Thread starter Deutsche Gopher Fan
  • Start date Start date
12 cases left this term, all are relatively "big" though some are related issues and one decision will inform the other.

Got some coming in about 5 minutes, presume the rest will come Monday and Tuesday next week.

My guesses (unless otherwise noted, 6-3 means party line vote)

Slaughter and Cook - can Trump fire independent agency heads without cause? (My guess is 6-3 yes on Slaughter, 7-2 no on Cook, with some completely illogical and arbitrary twist to exempt the Fed in Cook).

FEC - is the prohibition on coordination of election spending unconstitutional? (my guess is 6-3 yes)

Hecox & BPJ - transgender athlete cases. Guessing they side with the restrictions, but no clue on the vote.

Lopez - gun rights versus property rights. No clue on the vote here.

Watson - mail in votes. 6-3 for the restrictions

Barbara - birthright citizenship. 7-2 against Trump.

+ a few more
 
So basically, a private business owner or homeowner can no longer tell an open carry asshole to keep his peashooter in his lifted F-150?

Fun. Can't wait to see guns everywhere in restaurants and bars.

It's a little more nuanced. Hawaii has a law containing a presumption that guns are not allowed on private property open to the public unless the property owner affirmatively allows them.

Court says the 2A requires the opposite: guns are presumed allowed unless the property owner affirmatively prohibits them.
 
It's a little more nuanced. Hawaii has a law containing a presumption that guns are not allowed on private property open to the public unless the property owner affirmatively allows them.

Court says the 2A requires the opposite: guns are presumed allowed unless the property owner affirmatively prohibits them.
Seems reasonable to me. Also, if you own a gun you may never enter my house unless you're a cop and then only with a warrant.
 
1. Sweep 2026 and 2028.
2. Radically reorganize the Federal Judiciary.
3. Unwind the last 50 years of right wing terror.
 
Back
Top