What's new
USCHO Fan Forum

This is a sample guest message. Register a free account today to become a member! Once signed in, you'll be able to participate on this site by adding your own topics and posts, as well as connect with other members through your own private inbox!

  • The USCHO Fan Forum has migrated to a new plaform, xenForo. Most of the function of the forum should work in familiar ways. Please note that you can switch between light and dark modes by clicking on the gear icon in the upper right of the main menu bar. We are hoping that this new platform will prove to be faster and more reliable. Please feel free to explore its features.

119th congress: must be at least 75 to chair a committee!

  • Thread starter Thread starter Deutsche Gopher Fan
  • Start date Start date
The mistake wasn't Hillary's candidacy per se, but rather the terrible campaign management decisions made late in the game.

They needed to give up on flipping GA and AZ in that cycle, and run back to the Upper Midwest/Rust Belt to counter Conway's 11th hour strategy. They didn't do that and fucked themselves.
 
Hillary was, sadly, a DEI nominee. The most hated figure in American politics but she was able to cram it down our throats because nobody in the Dem coalition dared say the empress had no clothes. It was HER TURN!

Probably set the cause of women back 20 years. And the only nominee who could have lost to Dump the first time.

Thanks for nothing.
Despite all her warts she would have been a fabulous POTUS at the very least for keeping us from where we are now - both domestically and internationally. And honestly she would have been 100x more Presidential. Whomever ran her campaign should be tarred and feathered.
 
Yes, of course. But you can't be a great president if you're a terrible candidate.

We should just run dumb hair dos like Newsom and have them replace their VP with a brilliant unelectable and then resign. Robert Reich would make a great president.
 
Despite all her warts she would have been a fabulous POTUS at the very least for keeping us from where we are now - both domestically and internationally. And honestly she would have been 100x more Presidential. Whomever ran her campaign should be tarred and feathered.
she's fucking brilliant.

plenty of terrible candidates have sailed to victory.

I'm so sick of "experts" repeating this shit. Perhaps the issue isn't that she's a terrible candidate. but so many men are so deep rooted in their misogyny that they repeat this until it becomes rule.

what do I know, I'm just a woman who needs to sit and listen to what the men say.
 
She was attacked for 20+ years and eventually, it stuck to her to the point where the corporate media itself spent the entire summer dragging her through the mud. At that point she was unelectable.
 
She wasn't unelectable. She damn near won despite low democratic voter turnout and everything under the sun working against her, including as DGF pointed out a lot of deeply rooted misogyny.
 
We might actually have a War Powers Resolution vote.

il_794xN.6671320840_f5os.jpg



Democrats and a few Republicans on Capitol Hill escalated their demands on Saturday for Congress to weigh in on President Trump’s power to wage war against Iran, insisting in the aftermath of strikes he undertook without congressional approval that lawmakers immediately return to Washington to vote on the matter.

Even before Mr. Trump ordered a surprise attack on Iran’s government in coordination with Israel, leaving plumes of smoke rising over Tehran, the House and Senate had been on track to debate and vote next week on resolutions to rein in the president’s war powers.

The measures — one expected to be considered in the Senate on Tuesday and the other in the House on Thursday — appear all but certain to fail, given that proponents of restraining the president’s authority lack the necessary support to override a presidential veto. But the effort took on new urgency in the aftermath of Saturday’s strikes, which set the stage for every member of Congress to take a position on Mr. Trump’s decision to abandon diplomatic talks in favor of unilateral military action.

“The administration has not provided Congress and the American people with critical details about the scope and immediacy of the threat,” Senator Chuck Schumer, Democrat of New York and the minority leader, said in a statement on Saturday. He called for Congress to “quickly return to session and reassert its constitutional duty” by passing legislation to curtail the military campaign against Iran.

Following the surprise attack on Saturday, most Republicans appeared no more willing to support such a move than they had been before the president said he was launching a “massive and ongoing” campaign against Iran. They praised Mr. Trump for attacking an enemy they said for years had sought to expand its nuclear capacity, sponsored terror groups and threatened the security of the United States and its allies.

“The Iranian regime has refused the diplomatic offramps that would peacefully resolve these national security concerns,” Senator John Thune of South Dakota, the majority leader, said in a statement. “I commend President Trump for taking action to thwart these threats.”

But Democrats expressed alarm about the attack. They said the president had presented no clear evidence of an imminent threat to warrant it. And while they said they shared the desire to end Iran’s nuclear ambitions, they said military action required deliberation and coordination with the legislative branch that Mr. Trump had refused to engage in.

“The American people and Congress deserve immediate answers,” said Senator Jeanne Shaheen of New Hampshire, the top Democrat on the Senate Foreign Relations Committee. In a statement that accused Mr. Trump of having a “disappointingly cavalier approach towards the use of force,” she called for Congress to return without delay “before this entanglement grows,” and vote on the matter.

“The Senate should immediately return to session and vote on my war powers resolution to block the use of U.S. forces in hostilities against Iran,” said Senator Tim Kaine of Virginia, who partnered with Senator Rand Paul, Republican of Kentucky, on a measure that would require that the president seek authorization from Congress before taking further military action against Iran.

“Every single senator needs to go on the record about this dangerous, unnecessary, and idiotic action,” Mr. Kaine added.

Fewer than a handful of Republicans agreed, including Mr. Paul and Representative Thomas Massie, another Kentucky Republican who has cosponsored a similar resolution on Iran.

“The Constitution conferred the power to declare or initiate war to Congress for a reason, to make war less likely,” Mr. Paul wrote on social media on Saturday, adding: “My oath of office is to the Constitution, so with studied care, I must oppose another presidential war.”

Mr. Massie said the strikes amounted to “acts of war unauthorized by Congress.”

Both measures invoke the War Powers Act, which allows for speedy consideration of any resolution to terminate military hostilities unless Congress has authorized them.

Mr. Kaine forced a similar vote last summer after Mr. Trump directed strikes on three nuclear sites in Iran. That effort failed, as did a subsequent attempt to curb military action in Venezuela. But he has argued that the scale of the buildup in the Middle East in recent weeks has changed the stakes on Iran.

Now, the question is whether an active military campaign will persuade any Republicans to think twice about allowing Mr. Trump to continue unchecked.

Only a handful of Republicans had signaled openness to supporting the resolutions.

Representative Warren Davidson of Ohio had said he would back the House measure if the administration failed to provide new information justifying military action.

“I have asked for a classified briefing defining the mission in Iran,” Mr. Davidson wrote in a social media post on Thursday that he reshared on Saturday morning, adding that “war requires Congressional authorization,” and that “no case has been made” for it.
 
Maga congress isn't going to stop him. The WH will just say we need to keep fighting because there isn't any way to stop it and they will go along like good little bootlickers.
 
Back
Top