What's new
By:
USCHO Fan Forum

This is a sample guest message. Register a free account today to become a member! Once signed in, you'll be able to participate on this site by adding your own topics and posts, as well as connect with other members through your own private inbox!

  • The USCHO Fan Forum has migrated to a new plaform, xenForo. Most of the function of the forum should work in familiar ways. Please note that you can switch between light and dark modes by clicking on the gear icon in the upper right of the main menu bar. We are hoping that this new platform will prove to be faster and more reliable. Please feel free to explore its features.

Covfefe-19 The 11th Part: Suck It Up And Die Grandpa I Need A Manicure!!

Status
Not open for further replies.
I'm going back to Cali, Cali, Cali. I'm going back to Cali.

I don't think so

Code: 
CA 5448
TX 5112
FL 2926
AZ 2196
MS 1265
GA 1227
SC 1008
 
Kepler said:
I think it means Ohio has mandatory state rules and Indiana has state rules which can be adopted or overruled by local authorities. I'm reading it as ideally they would be the same but in practice Indiana is weaker because local yokels will water down what restrictions there are.
Click to expand...

According to experts interviewed by the IndyStar, local governments can only impose further restrictions on top of the state’s restrictions in the state of Indiana, so, the exact opposite of what you’re saying.

https://www.google.com/amp/s/amp.indystar.com/amp/3013946001
 
Not the same, sure, but isn’t more restrictive better in this case? Don’t we want a place like Indianapolis, obviously the state’s largest metropolitan area, probably run by Democrats, to make the decision to open later and slower than the rest of the state, while not allowing French Lick to open up two weeks earlier and with 100% capacity for everything?
I feel like some states banned local governments from making any changes. Texas might be one. Don’t we want to keep the smart, blue cities safe(r) while the red, rural areas allegedly dance around with reckless, maskless abandon?
 
25 million Americans have no job, 16 million lost their health insurance during a pandemic, but let's make sure rich mother****ers can travel to their 2nd or 3rd homes on vacation on the taxpayer dime.
 
Cases per day for the country as a whole was fairly steady between early May and mid-June. While they have started to trend up, deaths per day have slowly been on the decline since early May. However 1) I don't trust the counts are being accurately reported in several states 2) Death counts will lag 3) It's very likely deaths per day will start to rise in the near future. Hopefully that won't happen.
 
Best meme I’ve seen in a long time: if you don’t need a mask because God will protect you, then why do you need an assault rifle?
 
Slap Shot said:
Cases per day for the country as a whole was fairly steady between early May and mid-June. While they have started to trend up, deaths per day have slowly been on the decline since early May. However 1) I don't trust the counts are being accurately reported in several states 2) Death counts will lag 3) It's very likely deaths per day will start to rise in the near future. Hopefully that won't happen.
Click to expand...

I'm sorry if this is a medically stupid question but could we be getting better at treatment? I realize there is no cure, but could doctors be getting better managing symptoms so they don't develop additional problems that kill them?

Or, could we be getting better at identifying cases earlier, thus getting them into treatment at a relatively safer time?
 
So we can't give everyone money to stay home but we can pay them to go on vacation. God Republicans are fucking stupid.
 
Kepler said:
I'm sorry if this is a medically stupid question but could we be getting better at treatment? I realize there is no cure, but could doctors be getting better managing symptoms so they don't develop additional problems that kill them?

Or, could we be getting better at identifying cases earlier, thus getting them into treatment at a relatively safer time?
Click to expand...

I think it's a great question but I'm not in any position to answer. I wonder if les or WW have some insight on that.
 
Just cause people test positive doesn't mean they have to be hospitalized. Since most of the cases seem to be young people they most likely aren't in danger of dying.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top