What's new
USCHO Fan Forum

This is a sample guest message. Register a free account today to become a member! Once signed in, you'll be able to participate on this site by adding your own topics and posts, as well as connect with other members through your own private inbox!

  • The USCHO Fan Forum has migrated to a new plaform, xenForo. Most of the function of the forum should work in familiar ways. Please note that you can switch between light and dark modes by clicking on the gear icon in the upper right of the main menu bar. We are hoping that this new platform will prove to be faster and more reliable. Please feel free to explore its features.

World Soccer XXX: We Have Men Too!

Status
Not open for further replies.
Good god, what's the field? 64?
27. 16 of the spots go to either Liga MX or MLS teams, 6 each for Liga MX and MLS (well, one of the US spots is the Open Cup Winner so that one could theoretically go to a non-MLS team), 3 from Leagues Cup (which MLS got all three this year), plus the Canadian Cup winner (which, again, could theoretically be a non-MLS team). The Caribbean gets 3, Central America gets 6, and, because the President of CONCACAF is Canadian, the Canadian Premier League gets 2.
 
Saw that. I love the team with the most US titles of all time was a bunch of Jews from LA.
Depends on the definition of “US Titles”.

US Open Cups? Yeah, they’re tied with Bethlehem Steel.

If you include National League Titles then Bethlehem Steel has them dwarfed with 5 Open Cups and 9 American Soccer League titles. Seattle comes close if you include their A-League/USL titles (4) with their Open Cups (4), MLS Cups (2) and Supporters Shield (1). The Galaxy come close too (5 MLS Cups, 4 Supporters Shields and 2 Open Cups).
 
MLS announces sporting initiatives for 2024 Season.

Off-Field Treatment Rule

The Off-Field Treatment Rule allows medical professionals with time to assess and treat players off the field of play in a less pressurized environment.

If a player with a suspected injury remains on the ground for more than 15 seconds, the referee will stop play and wave the medical crew onto the field to evaluate the player. When safe, the player will be removed from the field and remain off the field for a minimum of two minutes for further assessment and treatment.

First implemented in MLS NEXT Pro midway through the 2022 season and continued through the entirety of the 2023 season, the Off-Field Treatment Rule has allowed medical staffs time to treat players, while also allowing match play to resume quickly.

Exceptions to the Off-Field Treatment Rule include instances of potential head injury, goalkeeper injuries, serious medical events, and fouls resulting in yellow or red cards.

Timed Substitution Rule

Maximizing effective match time, the Timed Substitution Rule requires that a substituted player exit the field within 10 seconds. Failure to exit from any point on the field within the 10 seconds will cause the incoming player to wait for a 60-second holding period, before entering the game at the next stoppage. During the holding period and prior to the substitute entering, the team will play down a player. Exceptions to the rule include injury and goalkeeper substitutions.

Enacted in MLS NEXT Pro during the 2023 season, 99.7% of the more than 3200 substitutions were completed in 10 seconds or less.

In-Stadium VAR Announcements

Pending International Football Association Board (IFAB) approval, VAR decisions will be announced by the referee to fans in stadium and viewers at home.

The off field treatment rule is something that I wish would be implemented by IFAB.
 
So MLS has announced that it will be having the developmental MLS Next Pro teams participate in the US Open Cup instead of the first teams.

Naturally the soccer press and the vocal parts of the fanbases are upset. Meanwhile the other 75% are saying “US Open what? Tennis? Golf?”

Yeah, it sucks, I don’t like it. But also, it’s not like the USSF has done a great job marketing the tournament either (seriously, off the top of your heads name who has the broadcasting rights and how to watch a game). And these reporters that are upset usually don’t bother with it until the final, if that. Sounds like MLS is playing hardball to enact some changes.
 
So MLS has announced that it will be having the developmental MLS Next Pro teams participate in the US Open Cup instead of the first teams.

Naturally the soccer press and the vocal parts of the fanbases are upset. Meanwhile the other 75% are saying “US Open what? Tennis? Golf?”

Yeah, it sucks, I don’t like it. But also, it’s not like the USSF has done a great job marketing the tournament either (seriously, off the top of your heads name who has the broadcasting rights and how to watch a game). And these reporters that are upset usually don’t bother with it until the final, if that. Sounds like MLS is playing hardball to enact some changes.

I misread this at first and thought MLS Next were also going to be competing, so it would be like NHL and AHL teams playing in a tournament together, which seemed cool. But only having the Next teams play is lame.
 
Liga MX final is wild. America vs UANL. Late second half a UANL player gets a straight red for a no look slap to the face of an America player. Now the UANL goalie just got his second yellow and sent off for taking out an America player near midfield on a long ball, so they're down to 9. He just spent five minutes screaming at every official on the field and is now hiding under a tarp behind the ribbon boards on the field to avoid getting hit with items being thrown.
 
Liga MX final is wild. America vs UANL. Late second half a UANL player gets a straight red for a no look slap to the face of an America player. Now the UANL goalie just got his second yellow and sent off for taking out an America player near midfield on a long ball, so they're down to 9. He just spent five minutes screaming at every official on the field and is now hiding under a tarp behind the ribbon boards on the field to avoid getting hit with items being thrown.
UANL (Tigres for those who don’t know) added another red card in OT. Honestly, it seems like it was a standard Liga MX Final. And they do it twice a year.

Club America wins for the first time since the 2018 Apertura. Doesn’t sound like much but remember that Club America is probably the biggest club in the hemisphere. Like, imagine the Yankees but they’re owned by Disney and every Yankees game was on ABC while the rest of MLB was buried on ESPN2. That’s what goes on with CA, Televisa and Liga MX.
 
The last few days have been very telling of the US Soccer media landscape. The amount of articles and videos about MLS’ decision with the US Open Cup, talking about how MLS is “an unserious league” or “ruining American soccer”, even though 99% of the people churning out the content have never watched an Open Cup match in their life.

It’s almost like they have an agenda against MLS and were just looking for an excuse to make more negative content about it.

And people wonder why the league doesn’t market itself to these people…
 
The USSF has told MLS to pound sand and denied the request to play with the reserve teams.

Twitter conspiracy theorists in shambles.
 
In Euro news, the European Court of Justice has ruled that UEFA and FIFA have acted against competition laws and that they cannot prevent the formation of a European Super League.

A22 sports, with Barcelona and Real Madrid, have announced their proposal: A 64 team competition divided into three different divisions, 16 teams in the top division, 16 in the second division and 32 in the bottom division. There’d be pro/rel between the divisions and the bottom division would be more fluid with access to domestic league winners. The competition would have its own streaming platform with the matches being free to watch.

Most of the other clubs, including the Premier League, Bayern, PSG, Dortmund, and Man U, have already rejected it.
 
In other, other news: The rumored payout for FIFA's new Club World Cup in 2025 is a minimum 50 million Euros per team.

Like, chump change for the UEFA clubs but holy **** would 50 million be incredible for Seattle.
 
Most of the other clubs, including the Premier League, Bayern, PSG, Dortmund, and Man U, have already rejected it.

The Bundesliga teams will not join as long as the fans are against it, but the top Premier League teams will jump back on board as soon as they can safely do it. If you think the Glazers give a damm about the English football pyramid or sporting integrity, I have some oceanfront property in Kansas to sell you.
 
The field went from 7 to... 32?!
TBF, it’s every four years instead of every year now so the field really went from 28 to 32.

For information purposes, 50 million Euros is about $55 million. Seattle spent about $19 million in salary in 2023.
 
The Bundesliga teams will not join as long as the fans are against it, but the top Premier League teams will jump back on board as soon as they can safely do it. If you think the Glazers give a damm about the English football pyramid or sporting integrity, I have some oceanfront property in Kansas to sell you.
Why would they? They’re already in the Super League aka the Premier League. Financial growth in the PL is significantly larger than any other league.

That’s why Madrid and Barcelona are still trying to get this thing off. With the growth of the Premier League and the rise of clubs backed by wealthy petrostates, Madrid and Barcelona (and Italian clubs like Juventus and AC Milan) are on the verge of becoming functionally irrelevant.
 
Is this a trick question?

Because they can make even more money.

It also will allow the English clubs to maintain the advantage over top teams in other countries. If they eschew the Money League then other teams will close that gap.
They’d lose money from the Premier League though (it would be inevitable). I think the English clubs have learned it wouldn’t be a net positive.
 
They’d lose money from the Premier League though (it would be inevitable). I think the English clubs have learned it wouldn’t be a net positive.

It would depend on the format, but the proposal I saw has the teams cashing in on both their domestic as well as the international TV deals. It would be the same as the current Champions League, just bigger and more lucrative.

Since the Money League would be 64 instead of just 16 teams, it will be inviting more English teams than just the Big Six. That means they would approve deals that allow teams the dip into both revenue streams. Teams like Crystal Palace and Everton, who are perennial bottom half of the table teams may be against it, but Newcastle, Aston Villa, West Ham, Fulham...they will be for it. A team like Leicester could be relegated in domestic competition but still be in the Money League because of the title run nearly a decade ago.


​​​​​
​​​


​​
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top