You mean the extra $2 million a year that doesn't really exist? Minnesota was making plenty of dou before. Just because your program needs football brand recognition to sell hockey that doesn't mean hockey isn't successfully sold on its own merits elsewhere (where it is actually appreciated for just being good hockey).
So while you might not care that schools like MSU, BSU, Tech, etc... need their matchups with schools like UW (it is true that they need UW far more than UW needs them), don't take for granted the fact that UW needs the Gophers far more than the Gophers will ever need UW.
god you're beyond compare
#1 - what part of the annual attendance leader figures have you missed out on in the last 30-40 years? 1st place maybe? UW doesn't need football to sell hockey. if you want football fans to come to the games, well then maybe, but UW has plenty of hockey fans (though some have soured recently and may not return).
UW has dominated the overall attendance figures going back to before I started watching in 1984
#2 - really? the gophers don't need UW? cool, go ahead and schedule RIT, QU, Huntsville and Vermont and see what transpires attendance-wise
You have ONE division 1 program in-state, less games on TV, and an arena with a larger capacity, and the Gophers STILL pull in more revenue than UW. I think attendance at UW this year demonstrated how much people really care about hockey.
And if UW wasn't on our schedule, that means we'd have to schedule RIT, QU, Huntsville, etc???? How about BC, BU, Notre Dame, etc...
Trust me, it would hurt UW FAR, FAR, FAR worse than it would ever hurt the Gophers. And if you guys only care about yourselves and you don't want to help our smaller fellow conference mates, I'd love to see the Gophers return the favor and shun you guys. Too bad we can't.
Ok, probably not the place for this discussion. Just my two cents. I'll move on.
Your adopted program is basically a one-sport school sitting in the middle of the so-called "state of hockey" which supposedly has the cream of the crop of young players who supposedly grow up want to be gophers, yet the team has been a huge underperformer since the 70s with the exception of a two-year burp when a couple of NoDaks let the team to NCs, while UW has won more NCs, outdraws UMinn in fans, and does not have a reputation for fans who come late, leave early, and sit on their hands while they are there.
Your grip is way too tight Dubber. Relax and enjoy the game. You might hit a few fairways.
Hey, it's been even longer since your favorite program has won it all, so I suppose it hasn't done squat since 2000 then either, ha?
And let's not get into a discussion of whom is reliant upon whom's talent to win. Without Minnesotans playing at NoDak, doubtful that program would even be D1.
I respect UND though. I doubt they feel too good to play the likes of Mankato and Bemidji moving forward. I respect that. North Dakota is also near the top of the list as a state when it comes to kids registered to play the sport per capita. Not in the middle of the list like Wisconsin. There is actually a hockey culture in North Dakota. I respect that too.
Winning NC's takes more than talent. It takes a good deal of luck and great timing. UW has had more of that and thus finished their opportunities better than Minnesota. They fall well short of Minnesota in conference hardware and Frozen fours, though which tells me they haven't fielded good teams nearly as often.
I have far less issues with UW as I do with the mentality that the program should only be out to help itself and not give back to college hockey by playing the smaller schools who are reliant upon games with the bigger programs to stay a float.
The Badgers folded their program at one time, so Badger fans should realize this importance as much as anyone.
Please move on like you said....before you wrote another book on hockey history.
I find it funny you care so much about Wisconsin hockey.
Do you really think the Gophers care about playing the other Minnesota schools? If they had their way and didn't care about what people around the State would say about them. They would not schedule Bemidji or St Cloud cuz they would rather play better programs. But they feel like the big bro to these schools and have to play them. Gopher hockey is a farse!
Stop drinking the Lucia kool aid! He'll say anything to please you Minnesota zombies. Behind closed doors and not within ear shot of the minny walking dead. He couldn't care less but will schedule teams like Bemidji to make sure they get a couple wins a season. He was quoted as saying "you don't want to schedule yourself out of a job"
Mariucci encouraged and helped UMD move to D1. Herb Brooks helped move SCSU to D1. .
Speaking of Big John, is it true he was born with genitalia shaped exactly like a gopher? Instead of circumcision, he had the teeth removed.
Don't be mistaken, I care about the schools your program is refusing to play.
Don't be confused about who some posters on this board are saying they don't care to watch UW play, and who the Badgers are refusing to play. I don't think the UW has said they are refusing to play anyone.![]()
Don't be mistaken, I care about the schools your program is refusing to play.
Hope you're right. I really do.
no man really, Barry Alvarez and Mike Eaves have both stated repeatedly in public they only want to play a revolving schedule of Michigan, Minnesota, MSU, tOSU, PSU, Nodak, BC, BU and have stated no other school cuts it, the rest are too small, and don't have "history" on their side (insert roll eyes here)
seriously get a life. do you see any UW posters flaming in Minnesota threads?
no man really, Barry Alvarez and Mike Eaves have both stated repeatedly in public they only want to play a revolving schedule of Michigan, Minnesota, MSU, tOSU, PSU, Nodak, BC, BU and have stated no other school cuts it, the rest are too small, and don't have "history" on their side (insert roll eyes here)
seriously get a life. do you see any UW posters flaming in Minnesota threads?
In fact, Eaves actions have spoken load and clear. There was a reason PSU in their first season of D1 was on Wisconsins schedule....Eaves. Alabama-Huntsville has also been lent a helping hand by being scheduled when they were in a tough spot without a conference. Now if you expect UW hockey to be run as a non-profit charitable institution solely for proping up the little sisters of Minnesota state university system...you'll be sadly mistaken. It is hardly shocking that UW would want 2:1 home games to play some schools as has been rumored. Hell...taking this beyond a UW issue....some schools in D1 hockey will have an extremely difficult time getting ANY home games against most of the D1 powers. BC, Michigan, Minnesota, nor UW is going to play a game at Huntsville any time soon. There is a difference between lending a helping hand and bad business.
The new WCHA was feeding us a steady diet of Bemidji, Tech, Mankato, AA, Omaha while we were seeing less and less of North Dakota, Denver, Duluth and the teams I want to see in Madison. B6 conference cuts what I don't want to see down to at worst 4 games (Ohio St and PSU and even there I think the existing product is far better then the bottom feeder WCHA and the potential is not even in the same zip code) and opens the flexibility to play a diverse out of conference schedule. If we are going to only play North Dakota or Denver twice in season...it shouldn't be because we have to play mankato or tech 4 times.