Leather helmet
New member
I think this weekend's series rates its own thread.
I haven't seen the Badgers play (other than a few highlights), so I will try a quick statistical comparison.
Advantage Wisconsin:
1. Goaltending: there are a lot of factors that go into a low GAA, but clearly ARD is mopping up everything that gets through to her. UM goaltending has not exactly been a weakness, but it seems like there are a lot of rebounds ending up in the slot.
2. Scoring balance: I was surprised to see how much more evenly-balanced the scoring is for the Badger forward lines 1-3 (I am making some assumptions on who is on each of the lines: 1) 19-21-26 2) 11-12-16 3) 7-25-27 ). Using +/- as an indicator of effectiveness, the three lines are +62/+44/+40.
3. Penalty Killing: against more or less the same competition as the Gophers, the Badgers have allowed 1 goal in 47 chances. That is an unreal statistic.
4. Gophers' penalty killing: UW is a middling 25% on the power play, but the Gophers' penalty killers are college hockey's Funhouse Mirrors: they make you look better than you really are.
Advantage Minnesota:
1. Power Play: I have never seen 50% for a full season, but the Gophers are on track. It will be fun to watch UM power play against UW penalty killers.
2. First line: using my same metric (+/-) as a stand-in for line's effectiveness, the Gopher's first line (21-22-26) are combined +91, 50% better than UW's top line.
My call: a series split. If they played 100 times, they would each win 50.
I haven't seen the Badgers play (other than a few highlights), so I will try a quick statistical comparison.
Advantage Wisconsin:
1. Goaltending: there are a lot of factors that go into a low GAA, but clearly ARD is mopping up everything that gets through to her. UM goaltending has not exactly been a weakness, but it seems like there are a lot of rebounds ending up in the slot.
2. Scoring balance: I was surprised to see how much more evenly-balanced the scoring is for the Badger forward lines 1-3 (I am making some assumptions on who is on each of the lines: 1) 19-21-26 2) 11-12-16 3) 7-25-27 ). Using +/- as an indicator of effectiveness, the three lines are +62/+44/+40.
3. Penalty Killing: against more or less the same competition as the Gophers, the Badgers have allowed 1 goal in 47 chances. That is an unreal statistic.
4. Gophers' penalty killing: UW is a middling 25% on the power play, but the Gophers' penalty killers are college hockey's Funhouse Mirrors: they make you look better than you really are.
Advantage Minnesota:
1. Power Play: I have never seen 50% for a full season, but the Gophers are on track. It will be fun to watch UM power play against UW penalty killers.
2. First line: using my same metric (+/-) as a stand-in for line's effectiveness, the Gopher's first line (21-22-26) are combined +91, 50% better than UW's top line.
My call: a series split. If they played 100 times, they would each win 50.