And we can be honest with ourselves and admit that we're just being eager little fanboys thinking we can get Oz and Granato on the same staff, right?
Yeah, but it would knock our socks off!
And we can be honest with ourselves and admit that we're just being eager little fanboys thinking we can get Oz and Granato on the same staff, right?
Wow, it is great to see so much positivity in a UW thread.
A quick question to those of you who had stopped getting tickets; how does this impact you?
Are you already planning on coming back to what you had before? Coming back for one night to start? Getting some single game tickets to take a look?
One of the common assumptions in previous threads was that a new coach would invigorate the masses and bring people back to the KC in swarms. I'm curious to see how many of you are willing to walk the walk now.
Or is everyone now switching to BA as the reason they can't support UW Athletics in general?
Part of that is I was talking to my mother the other day about the HC position and she thinks Mark Johnson really wants to follow in his father's footsteps as coach of the men's team. Disregarding the women's team for a second, think of what the men's team would be like if you had a legacy coach such as MJ. What boy ages 16-18 that loves hockey hasn't seen the movie Miracle? That's a major + in the recruiting department to be able to play for a guy who was on that 1980 team AND scored half of the goals for USA in their 4-3 win against the USSR. Then combine that factor with the recruiting connections that Granato and Osiecki have.
Getting the recruits is the majority of the battle. I'm sure MJ would have a great system to run similar to his father's or Jeff Sauer's.
Now, regarding the women's team. It's totally fair to say he should stay there since he's built Wisconsin into a contender year in and year out. Went to one of their games this year, a 4-0 win over Dartmouth, where the teams were definitely in different tiers. The shots were 63-9 at the end of the game. That's what I want for the men's team. We should be the team doing the dominating, not the team getting dominated like this last two years.
Just my perspective on things. If Osiecki is the new HC I won't mind it but I hope he has someone like Granato lined up to be his assistant.
/rant
women's hockey is top heavy in a way that the men's game will never be again. A few programs get all of the best players and fortunately, uw is one of them.
Mj is undoubtedly a great women's coach, but he also has a lot to work with.
I can't see miracle or what mark did 35+ years ago having a greater impact on a kid than oz being able to say, "look at the guys i helped get into the nhl."
also, he can point to his junior and ahl experience and show that he understands the entire journey, inside and out.
This entire thread reminds me of a bunch of SIDs pumping their Hobey candidate with little regard for who actually deserves it. It’s simple, pick the best person and forget about all the homer stuff!
Is there a possibility Geoffrion ever gets behind a bench?
Maybe Butters is feeling recharged after a couple years off?Considering how much BA has cared about the hockey program, I can't help but to think that he would believe that hiring Doug Woog would "blow our socks off."
Women's hockey is top heavy in a way that the men's game will never be again. A few programs get all of the best players and fortunately, UW is one of them.
MJ is undoubtedly a great women's coach, but he also has a lot to work with.
Considering how much BA has cared about the hockey program, I can't help but to think that he would believe that hiring Doug Woog would "blow our socks off."
Yeah, but he and his staff have gone out and gotten the best players and coached them up to be championship caliber. It's not like they can just draw a 60 mile radius of Madison to get recruits. The roster is literally made of players from coast-to-coast (California to upstate New York & British Columbia to Quebec).
I do understand that there aren't a ton of options for the top recruits and there is no flight risk to junior hockey/NHL. However, I just don't think it's automatic that Wisconsin will be a women's hockey super-power whomever is in charge.
Let's not pretend it could/would (automatically) translate to the men's game though.
Well, with the addition of Notre Dame, I suppose that we're right where Barry wanted us to be back in 2009 (remember when he was saying we should leave the WCHA for the CCHA or independence back then?).
In fact, this is probably even better than Barry's CCHA plan... he gets almost all of the bowl division D-I football schools (other than BC, UConn and the MAC schools) AND he doesn't have to play UP schools, Alaska schools, "other" Minnesota schools, etc.