What's new
USCHO Fan Forum

This is a sample guest message. Register a free account today to become a member! Once signed in, you'll be able to participate on this site by adding your own topics and posts, as well as connect with other members through your own private inbox!

  • The USCHO Fan Forum has migrated to a new plaform, xenForo. Most of the function of the forum should work in familiar ways. Please note that you can switch between light and dark modes by clicking on the gear icon in the upper right of the main menu bar. We are hoping that this new platform will prove to be faster and more reliable. Please feel free to explore its features.

Wisconsin Hockey Part 2 - No Silly Eaves-isms, Just Win The Title!

  • Thread starter Thread starter Gurtholfin
  • Start date Start date
Status
Not open for further replies.
Re: Wisconsin Hockey Part 2 - No Silly Eaves-isms, Just Win The Title!

we're 4th in the WCHA, why should we be #1 in the country?
The thing about polls I was never quit clear on is what are the voters actually voting on. Is it who they think has had the best season so far, is it who they think is the beast team at that moment, who they think will win it all? I’m not sure that is spelled out to the voters. Anyone know? :confused:
 
Re: Wisconsin Hockey Part 2 - No Silly Eaves-isms, Just Win The Title!

The polls don't matter.. The polls don't matter...
You know, I've been seeing this "polls don't matter" stuff repeated over and over again on this site and frankly I find it very disturbing. You all do realize that the ENTIRE WORLD (accept the Swiss, who everyone hates anyway) was plunged into bitter WAR, directly as a result of Hitler's invasion of Poll Land. I'm sick of this biggotted attitude toward Polls! It must stop! Where's the humanity!?:mad: If we can't learn the lessons history has provided, how can we ever expect to have peace in our time!?!
 
Re: Wisconsin Hockey Part 2 - No Silly Eaves-isms, Just Win The Title!

Harder schedule than the three teams ahead of us?

:p ;) :D

Just looking at it from ther perspective of other sports, if Wisconsin is #4 in the Big Ten in bouncyball or football, they're not going to be #1 in the national bouncyball poll or the football poll... Why is hockey any different?


Ok, in some cases I suppose you could fall to 4th place in the WCHA if your team is on a bye or playing a nonconference series, but since Wisconsin, and the teams above them in the WCHA have all played 18 games conference games, the fact remains that we're #4 in the conference.
 
Re: Wisconsin Hockey Part 2 - No Silly Eaves-isms, Just Win The Title!

I was (mostly) kidding. But how then do you explain DU being #1 in the country when they are 2(tie) in the wcha?
 
Re: Wisconsin Hockey Part 2 - No Silly Eaves-isms, Just Win The Title!

wow. so ALL WCHA teams in the top 13 toughest schedule (no surprise since it is the strongest conference top to bottom). That really doesn't make sense then as to who the writers voted for for #1 this week, esp with recent results.

As for the computer models.... If Minnesota is still a TUC and Western Michigan is still a TUC then I see why it favors Miami. That would be a flaw in my estimation. The COP is probably right on, but when Wisconsin's TUC's are generally tougher (WHCA) than Miami's (CCHA and robert morris) I guess that barometer doesn't fly with me unless it goes all the way out to compare the TUC's strength of schedules, which still wouldn't make sense given the entire WCHA is in the top 13.

that said, my main point is Miami isn't as good as the top 4-5 WCHA.

Well the TUC discussion exposes a major flaw in the PWR. Why the heck is there an arbitrary line drawn at #25? The difference between the 25th and 26th team is huge according to the PWR computer, but for real there really isn't much difference. I hope the KRACH gets implemented one of these years.
 
Re: Wisconsin Hockey Part 2 - No Silly Eaves-isms, Just Win The Title!

I know polls don't matter .

But yet, you get all bent out of shape over them.

nevermind, your an idiot. oh wait never mind you are right, you know everything and everyone else on here is just dumb homer fans and you are the general of college hockey. my mistake

about time you realize that

Explain this: we're 4th in the WCHA, why should we be #1 in the country?

because uw14 says so
 
Re: Wisconsin Hockey Part 2 - No Silly Eaves-isms, Just Win The Title!

The polls don't matter.. The polls don't matter...
You know, I've been seeing this "polls don't matter" stuff repeated over and over again on this site and frankly I find it very disturbing. You all do realize that the ENTIRE WORLD (accept the Swiss, who everyone hates anyway) was plunged into bitter WAR, directly as a result of Hitler's invasion of Poll Land. I'm sick of this biggotted attitude toward Polls! It must stop! Where's the humanity!?:mad: If we can't learn the lessons history has provided, how can we ever expect to have peace in our time!?!

Please don't forget that Hilter and Stalin split the Poles prior to Germany's invasion, and actually Russia moved in from the eastand Germany from the west. Both thought they were getting a buffer zone from eachother. And now we have the USCHO Pole and the USA Today Pole.
-----------
I have never liked the idea that a team in a poll is ranked ahead of a team they are behind in the conference standings. I really don't pay attention to other polls than Football, and there you never really see that there. I don't think you see it in bb either.
 
Re: Wisconsin Hockey Part 2 - No Silly Eaves-isms, Just Win The Title!

Enough of the meaningless rankings (gotta admitt I'd like to see the Badgers #1 as well) another big series this weekend at UMD.

As we head deeper into the season the lineup is getting closer to being set.

Street - Geoffrion - Smith
Murray - Stepan - Davies
Mitchell - Bendy - Grotting
Bombach- Thurber/ -Johnson
Dolan

I really hope you're wrong about Street playing on the top line. I only saw Friday's game this week, but things sure seemed to look up in the 3rd when Murray & Street got switched. Playing with Blake doesn't seem to suit Street. On the other hand, with the way Stepan & Davies create he seems to get more good chances.

I too miss the Mitchell-Dolan-Grotting line from last year. I hope it ends up as the 4th line, though. Those guys can create a lot of havoc and inject some energy into a game. Also, maybe moving Mitchell down to the 4th line will hurt his pride & he'll come with a little more energy. Last year the kid was a wrecking ball, this year he's solid, but never seems to have a game changing shift.
 
Re: Wisconsin Hockey Part 2 - No Silly Eaves-isms, Just Win The Title!

Enough of the meaningless rankings (gotta admitt I'd like to see the Badgers #1 as well) another big series this weekend at UMD.

As we head deeper into the season the lineup is getting closer to being set.

Street - Geoffrion - Smith
Murray - Stepan - Davies
Mitchell - Bendy - Grotting
Bombach- Thurber/ -Johnson
Dolan


It appears that Lee and Podge won't be seeing much ice for the remainder of the year, as neither really fits the 3rd or 4th line grinder roll.

The only question is who will center the 4th line. I saw both games this last weekend and although I thought both Thurber and Dolan played well, I would have to say Thurber outplayed Dolan by a good margin. Dolan is bigger, but I think Thurber is a more physical player and a better defensive zone asset. All that being said, What I would really like to see is Dolan moving out on the wing with Bomber and Thurber.

Just my .02 cents.

I agree 100%. Although didn't Murray switch spots with Street for Saturday?
 
Re: Wisconsin Hockey Part 2 - No Silly Eaves-isms, Just Win The Title!

I believe the PWR and KRACH attempt to measure which team has had the best total season. Not necessarily who is playing the best, or is the best at a given moment. ( I think...)
I was just thinking about it and wondering if it would make sense to progressively weight the games value in the equation as the season goes on. Beating UW for example week one, is not the same as beating them in week 10. Although I suppose that the beating team would be better in week 10 as well... but still it seems to make sense to me?

Yes, those systems are designed to look at the whole body of work. Obviously, since the season is in progress, they can only look back at the data collected to date.

As for the recent results, the PWR used to have a Last 10 category - measuring how you did coming down the stretch. It's a poor criteria for several reasons - one, hot teams are probably a good bet to win, but that's not what selection should be based on. Selection should be based on a fair assessment of the entire season. Two, the strength of schedule would vary wildly amongst those last ten games. It's not fair for a team from a weaker conference to coast through the end of their season, while a bubble team in the WCHA could have a 3 game playoff series with another tough team, plus 3 more tough games at the Final Five - how hot you are can depend a lot on who you're playing, and that criteria never addressed that. Three, how do you define this? Any time barrier would be arbitrary, and not really fair.

In the end, simply assessing all of the season is the only real way to do it.
 
Re: Wisconsin Hockey Part 2 - No Silly Eaves-isms, Just Win The Title!

Thanks Blockski, you make excellent points. I actually think the PWR works reasonably well on the last day of the season and have no major complaints really. (except that year UW was 17th.) I was thinking of how to better answer the question of "who is the best team in the country TODAY?" which (in my mind at least) is more the question the USCHO/USA TODAY polls try to answer. (see? Today is right there in the title!) Which is also why "they don't matter", because in terms of who is going to get in the NCAA's or win the title in the future, they don't. Many will say "Who cares? The championship is all that matters!" And rightly so. Except that as a fan in January, I care, dammit! For no meaningful reason. Which is why it's so important!
I forgot about the Last 10 PWR thing, thanks for bringing it up. As you point out, any arbitrary time barrier is bound to problematic. (Like the TUC being 25. Why not 27, or 18, or 35?) Which is why I suggested progressively weighting the importance of each game for the whole season. Week one get's .001; week 2, .002; etc. The other PWR factors (like that stupid TUC!) would still not overly reward a team for a late 6 win hot streak against the bottom teams,( although I think hotness should always be rewarded!) but beating a top team in February would count slightly more then beating them in your home opener. The thinking being that (barring players injury, suspension, randomly exploding.) most, if not all, college teams progress quite a lot as the season goes on, and this is glaringly not accounted for in a way I can see clearly.

Lastly, I've done the math with this adjusted system and the Badgers have been #1 for 27 straight years. So obviously it works.
 
Re: Wisconsin Hockey Part 2 - No Silly Eaves-isms, Just Win The Title!

If UW could ban student athletes from riding on scooters, I don't think a single UW coach would object.
 
Re: Wisconsin Hockey Part 2 - No Silly Eaves-isms, Just Win The Title!

Smith is still a little banged up as well. Hopefully both can play this weekend.

On another injury front, junior defenseman Brendan Smith was held out of contact drills Tuesday as a precaution. He appeared to suffer an injury to his left elbow -- TV replays suggest a hyperextension -- during the third period of a 3-3 overtime tie with Denver Jan. 22.
Smith, who shares the team lead in scoring with senior right winger Michael Davies, played the following night and is expected to be available for the Duluth series.
 
Re: Wisconsin Hockey Part 2 - No Silly Eaves-isms, Just Win The Title!

Doesn't the UW provide them to all student atheletes?

I don't know if they provide them, per se, or just facilitate students getting them.

I know plenty of coaches cringe when they see their athletes on them, though.
 
Re: Wisconsin Hockey Part 2 - No Silly Eaves-isms, Just Win The Title!

No the Athletic Department does not provide scooters to their athletes. Part of the reason why most of the athletes have scooters is that have such a limited window of time when they can take classes during each day. You can not take back to back classes on opposite ends of the campus without some means of transportation, and these times may be the only way to fit something into their schedule and still get to practice on time.

Or the other reason may be that since their parents don't have to shell out $20,000 per year on tuition, room n board and books, they may have a few bucks left for a scooter!
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top