Looks like the chart is off a year as Kaitlyn Kotlowski signed her LOI today.
Early verbals.....I can only speak for UW, but the fear of verballing then getting dumped seems overblown at least from a UW perspective. There's an awesome spreadsheet for the UW women's recruits that lists all the verbals 4 years out and I don't recall any player who has verballed (therefore on the list) not ending up on the team, unless there was an occasional issue getting into school which neither side would confirm. Johnson also runs a lean roster. Next year he has 12 F and 7 D on the team, the following year 12 F and 6 D. Yes, he does have a glut of G's - 4 on the roster now, but Soup was someone they always liked and when the sue locked the doors, they brought her in. What's the harm in verballing early? I don't think many 8th graders know where they want to go to school 5 years later, but these are not typical kids, they are driven, goal orientated kids, it kinda makes sense for them to be working outside the box of a typical 8th grader.
Elite programs like UW, MN, BC, etc attract elite talent and even if they “dropped” a prospect, chances are that player would find another spot. But I personally know of a handful of girls (over the course of the last 5-6 years or so) who didn’t end up attending the school they originally committed to- either due to grades, sudden head coaching change, and, in one case, questionable behavior (social media can be a killer!) so it does happen, just not often at places like UW.
I'm not trying to be a critic and I'm certainly not implying there's anything wrong with Wisconsin recruiting but there is an overall problem with coaches going after the youngest girls and that's why the NCAA is going to try some changes. Also let's not be tunnel visioned on the hockey part of it and remember it's the education that's the true goal of going to college.
As the parent of a former collegiate athlete I can say with a high degree of certainty that a 14 year old is not firmly committed to their future path in life or decided on a career field.
There is a lot of factors that go into that part of the decision and until you know what your field of choice is you won't know if the school that offered to you even offers that degree or that their program in whatever that field is will give you a diploma that will give you a step up above the other thousands graduating across the country with degrees in that same field.
This is another reason that I personally feel that a no contact or even a verbal until the junior year of high school is a good thing as a clearer and better informed choice can be made by the young lady on her educational needs and desires than she would be capable of making several years earlier.
I am glad it worked out for your daughter and her friends but there are many that the current way did not work out for.At 14, you would expect the parents to be providing the daughter with sound advice and guidance. She can always change her mind later however it is their choice. My daughter committed when she was 15 and it worked out just fine for her as it did for many of her friends and former teammates.
I am glad it worked out for your daughter and her friends but there are many that the current way did not work out for.
I think the NCAA has a handle on the bigger picture and will attempt to do the right thing. Question remains what will the "RIGHT" thing be?
Very happy to see UW control the games after OSU getting swept by BSU.
Awesome to see Clark is back, only had 1A on a Pankowski goal Saturday on the weekend, but she probably has to get her sea legs back and she was playing with a new wing in Cogan. Nice to see Shaver and Norby scoring, maybe adding Mauermann to that line helped.
Does anyone know what Roque said to the ref that got her the misconduct?
It amazes me that coaches can tell who’s going to be good by 8th grade. Seems like a risk on both sides, but obviously it works out. Are there many kids that don’t verbally commit until 11th grade anymore?
Does anyone know what Roque said to the ref that got her the misconduct?