What's new
USCHO Fan Forum

This is a sample guest message. Register a free account today to become a member! Once signed in, you'll be able to participate on this site by adding your own topics and posts, as well as connect with other members through your own private inbox!

  • The USCHO Fan Forum has migrated to a new plaform, xenForo. Most of the function of the forum should work in familiar ways. Please note that you can switch between light and dark modes by clicking on the gear icon in the upper right of the main menu bar. We are hoping that this new platform will prove to be faster and more reliable. Please feel free to explore its features.

What the Fark 2: That Was... Interesting.

Status
Not open for further replies.
Sooner or later the tribes are going to get smart and set up legal whorehouses on their lands. Then they'll have the market cornered on having all the fun.

Lust will not keep. Something must be done about it.

Legalize it, license it, & tax the heck out of it. Then make sure the men & women are regularly tested. You'll make a killing.
 
Re: What the Fark 2: That Was... Interesting.

Lust will not keep. Something must be done about it.

Legalize it, license it, & tax the heck out of it. Then make sure the men & women are regularly tested. You'll make a killing.

The middle two will ensure a black market still exists, albeit not as dangerous.
 
Re: What the Fark 2: That Was... Interesting.

Lust will not keep. Something must be done about it.

Legalize it, license it, & tax the heck out of it. Then make sure the men & women are regularly tested. You'll make a killing.

I believe out in Nevada where its legal in certain counties the ladies there get tested about once a month to hold their licences to work in the houses there. That testing alone can help keep some small town medical clinic out there up and running.
 
Re: What the Fark 2: That Was... Interesting.

That testing alone can help keep some small town medical clinic out there up and running.

Interesting.

I assume full legalization for prostitution will come (so to speak) in about 20 years. Once the state stops thinking of a woman's sexuality as something owned by men, there is no longer any legal justification for what is after all just a religious taboo.

Regulate it and tax it. Talk about a recession-proof industry.
 
I believe out in Nevada where its legal in certain counties the ladies there get tested about once a month to hold their licences to work in the houses there. That testing alone can help keep some small town medical clinic out there up and running.

IIRC Clark County (Vegas ) it's a no no. But the next county it is.

I don't think a married person should visit the cathouse due to promises made to the spouse, but for a single guy (girl) getting his (her) itch scratched, no problem.
 
Re: What the Fark 2: That Was... Interesting.

Interesting.

I assume full legalization for prostitution will come (so to speak) in about 20 years. Once the state stops thinking of a woman's sexuality as something owned by men, there is no longer any legal justification for what is after all just a religious taboo.

Regulate it and tax it. Talk about a recession-proof industry.

They don't call it the world's oldest profession for nothing. Demand always has been there, always will be there, and supply will find a way to be there, either legally or illegally. At least if you do it legally, you can cut off organized crime from it, raise a lot of tax revenue from it, and offer the women who work in that industry better protection than just having some pimp that will slap her around to make sure she gives him his money and might keep her on drugs. And with legal locations, those locations can work to attract clients to come there and compete to get the best workers they can get, which means women who really put some effort into it versus those that are just going thru the motions because they're forced into being a whore. That would also cut into the human trafficking that can on to support an illegal whore house.
 
Re: What the Fark 2: That Was... Interesting.

IIRC Clark County (Vegas ) it's a no no.

Lots of people have been easily fooled into thinking it's legit. One of many ways to while away the post-midnight hours in Vegas is to hit any casino floor bar at one of the ritzier hotels (Mandalay, Mandarin Oriental, Bellagio, Venetian) and play "Spot the Hooker".
 
Re: What the Fark 2: That Was... Interesting.

Lots of people have been easily fooled into thinking it's legit. One of many ways to while away the post-midnight hours in Vegas is to hit any casino floor bar at one of the ritzier hotels (Mandalay, Mandarin Oriental, Bellagio, Venetian) and play "Spot the Hooker".

You can play "spot the escort" in any high end hotel in the US. Just sit in the lobby between 11 and 1. Spectacularly good looking women looking like they just put on their makeup entering the hotel alone. Uh huh, sure.

I'm sure there's the male equivalent (assuming there are Republican Congressmen in town) but for whatever reason they don't set off my radar.
 
Re: What the Fark 2: That Was... Interesting.

Once the state stops thinking of a woman's sexuality as something owned by men, there is no longer any legal justification for what is after all just a religious taboo.

Regulate it and tax it. Talk about a recession-proof industry.

That is a really degrading view of women, in a way; and dismissing objections to prostitution merely as "a religious taboo" is really shallow and superficial.

"You're not at all a human being to me; you're merely a vehicle for my sexual release."

Yes, I say legalize it, license it, and hope that as a society we totally outgrow it.
 
Re: What the Fark 2: That Was... Interesting.

That is a really degrading view of women, in a way; and dismissing objections to prostitution merely as "a religious taboo" is really shallow and superficial.

"You're not at all a human being to me; you're merely a vehicle for my sexual release."

Yes, I say legalize it, license it, and hope that as a society we totally outgrow it.

Your assumption of a point of a view towards women is so telling. It implies the privileged vantage point of a declarer of norms. The point is, THAT'S what's sexist. :rolleyes:

You aren't going to get this, but the new reality is you don't get to choose a label anymore. You have no more power to define women in any fashion, positive or negative. They are beyond your control.

In regards to this topic, you are irrelevant. Conservatives always miss the point of "liberation," thinking that it's the exchange of one frame for another. The point is it breaks the frame entirely, and people are now free to define themselves. This is the point where conservatism and individualism always part, and why conservatism always hides a metallic core of oppression.
 
Last edited:
Re: What the Fark 2: That Was... Interesting.

Lots of people have been easily fooled into thinking it's legit. One of many ways to while away the post-midnight hours in Vegas is to hit any casino floor bar at one of the ritzier hotels (Mandalay, Mandarin Oriental, Bellagio, Venetian) and play "Spot the Hooker".

I always played "Hooker Or Escort." There are slight differences. :D
 
Re: What the Fark 2: That Was... Interesting.

I always played "Hooker Or Escort." There are slight differences. :D

Like about $500.

Precisely. I mean, if you distinguish between "hooker" as a term for a $50 streetwalker from the Arts District and "escort" as a term for the $1000/hr girls in clown makeup and stripper heels that troll the casino floors for single men wearing suits, at that point we're just splitting c--- hairs. In the end, the same services are being performed.
 
Re: What the Fark 2: That Was... Interesting.

Escorts try to look like they are with their sugar daddy. Hookers...notsomuch. Dress is also a slight, but key difference.
 
Re: What the Fark 2: That Was... Interesting.

Are you guys saying you all have experience with one and/or the other?
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top