What's new
USCHO Fan Forum

This is a sample guest message. Register a free account today to become a member! Once signed in, you'll be able to participate on this site by adding your own topics and posts, as well as connect with other members through your own private inbox!

  • The USCHO Fan Forum has migrated to a new plaform, xenForo. Most of the function of the forum should work in familiar ways. Please note that you can switch between light and dark modes by clicking on the gear icon in the upper right of the main menu bar. We are hoping that this new platform will prove to be faster and more reliable. Please feel free to explore its features.

Welcome St Thomas to Division I and the CCHA

I would assume yes, and expect it to be fully funded out of some massive booster pockets.

I quote this from elsewhere:

I don't think St. Thomas is going to have many financial issues.

UST raised about $36M in FY 2019 and has an endowment of nearly $500M as of FY 2019 that has almost doubled in the past decade.

Just to compare to some other institutions... SCSU raised $10.6 M in FY 2019 and has an endowment of $29M... North Dakota raised about $67.7 M in FY 2019 and has an endowment of $285M ...
 
St Thomas being so easily/quickly accepted to the CCHA tells me there were even bigger issues with ASU than their rink (or lack thereof). The Sun Devils had better reach out to WMU immediately and ask for a copy of their "Why Western" campaign so they can edit it to "Also Adding ASU?" and pass it on to the NCHC ASAP.

Without the NCHC taking them, ASU is going to be independent for a long time. Nobody else out West is going to be adding hockey with schools now cutting sports left and right. Their best hope for the near future is to try and secure some loose scheduling agreement with the four other independent teams to at least put 8 games on their schedule every year. But trying to get that travel budget approved with Covid going on and revenue way down is going to be a big ask. If there was extra money available - A bigger travel budget for ASU hockey or new travel warm-up suits and another three new sets of uniforms for the Sun Devils football team? What do you think the athletic department will choose...
 
St Thomas being so easily/quickly accepted to the CCHA tells me there were even bigger issues with ASU than their rink (or lack thereof). The Sun Devils had better reach out to WMU immediately and ask for a copy of their "Why Western" campaign so they can edit it to "Also Adding ASU?" and pass it on to the NCHC ASAP.

Without the NCHC taking them, ASU is going to be independent for a long time. Nobody else out West is going to be adding hockey with schools now cutting sports left and right. Their best hope for the near future is to try and secure some loose scheduling agreement with the four other independent teams to at least put 8 games on their schedule every year. But trying to get that travel budget approved with Covid going on and revenue way down is going to be a big ask. If there was extra money available - A bigger travel budget for ASU hockey or new travel warm-up suits and another three new sets of uniforms for the Sun Devils football team? What do you think the athletic department will choose...

You are correct. The extenuating issue had to do with the WCHA, maybe CCHA, requesting travel payments to play in PHX/Tempe, which was rejected. But you knew that.
 
I think when ASU said no the first time, the WCHA and nCCHA had mostly moved on.

I'd say it worked out just fine. ASU can and has still played CCHA teams out of conference, and they have figured out a way to piece together an independent schedule that allows them to make the NCAA tournament as an at-large. Meanwhile, the CCHA stayed within its geographic footprint.

The new CCHA is too "small potatoes" for a D1 major with 90,000 students, and that fact doesn't bother me at all.
 
I'm not thrilled with this. it seems like it was pre planned months ago. If that was the case they should have just told the other schools about it and let them get going on a new place to play instead of dropping a bomb on them like they did.
 
I'm not thrilled with this. it seems like it was pre planned months ago. If that was the case they should have just told the other schools about it and let them get going on a new place to play instead of dropping a bomb on them like they did.

IMO, the day UST announced last year that the MIAC kicked them out was the first day of them moving to the WCHA/CCHA.
 
I'm not thrilled with this. it seems like it was pre planned months ago.
It may have been, but I think it isn't hard to make the argument that StT is by FAR the best fit to round out the CCHA of the current independent programs. Even if there was no preplanning, how long would it take to look around college hockey and conclude they were the best option for the CCHA. How long would StT have to think to conclude the CCHA was their logical landing place?

They are small school, within the existing footprint of the conference, a D-I school (eliminates the minimal fears of BGSU bolting and taking the lone D-I voice in the room with them), they apparently have money to burn and even for as good as their other sports teams has been in D-III, I have to imagine that hockey will get an even bigger focus on campus going forward.

They can become a competitive hockey program in only a couple seasons where as football could take a decade or more, if ever, to reach that level of competitiveness in D-I. Not to mention they sit right in the center of the state of hockey. How will their hockey program NOT get more than their fair share of attention from the athletics department? There are now five other D-I hockey programs they have to exceed, just to be the best in their own state. I could easily see StT picking up some Gopher/SCSU/Mankato/Duluth/BSU 4th line cast offs with no playing time and being an above 0.500 team their first year in the CCHA.
 
Last edited:
I fully expect Mitch's Misfits to hold a Tommy Boy look-alike contest the first time St Thomas comes to Houghton.
Tommies like wingies...

hqdefault.jpg
 
Last edited:
Perhaps.

ASU is no less committed, it would seem, but that doesn’t always make it happen.

So, I know it may not be a great comparison, so don't jump on me for this, but StT hasn't had the broken promises like ASU has when it comes to an arena. ASU has gone through, what, like 3 or 4 deals for new arenas, including the one with the Coyotes? Now, according to an article from April, they're still on track to break ground in November & hopefully that's the case for all involved - especially to get people who may be out of work working again.

Hell, it'll be good for the sport.

StT is a new add, so it's not like they've had time to commit to building a new arena then backing out for whatever reason.

Or maybe they've committed to renting out a rink somewhere else in the city until they can expand/build a new rink.
 
I'd say it worked out just fine. ASU can and has still played CCHA teams out of conference, and they have figured out a way to piece together an independent schedule that allows them to make the NCAA tournament as an at-large. Meanwhile, the CCHA stayed within its geographic footprint.

The new CCHA is too "small potatoes" for a D1 major with 90,000 students, and that fact doesn't bother me at all.

I think it would have been great for ASU to join the WCHA/nCCHA conference, being that 10% (?) of the upper Midwest moves down to AZ in the winter & I like the nCCHA teams. But it wasn't meant to be, at least not yet........
 
So, I know it may not be a great comparison, so don't jump on me for this, but StT hasn't had the broken promises like ASU has when it comes to an arena. ASU has gone through, what, like 3 or 4 deals for new arenas, including the one with the Coyotes? Now, according to an article from April, they're still on track to break ground in November & hopefully that's the case for all involved - especially to get people who may be out of work working again.

Hell, it'll be good for the sport.

StT is a new add, so it's not like they've had time to commit to building a new arena then backing out for whatever reason.

Or maybe they've committed to renting out a rink somewhere else in the city until they can expand/build a new rink.

Can't say I know of any case where ASU broke any promise. They did their due diligence, came up with a better plan for a revenue generating facility. They fit it in with a grand master plan of the Innovation Corridor rather than hobble something together. Hopefully COVID won't delay groundbreaking & construction.
 
Back
Top