When I watch the teams play, I'd be inclined to agree with you -- Ohio State is a scary team. But they are -28 in goal differential in the league. The Buckeyes will have to get better defensively to climb out of the bottom half of the league.I truly thought OSU was the better team when they played ND and actually feel they are the 4th best team in the WCHA and are really close to #3.
Highslot. Why would you have your best player with the hardest shot down low behind the net? Makes no sense. If anything put her in front of the net.
When I watch the teams play, I'd be inclined to agree with you -- Ohio State is a scary team. But they are -28 in goal differential in the league. The Buckeyes will have to get better defensively to climb out of the bottom half of the league.
WCHA Standings at a Glance
7th Minnesota State (22 points) -- Unless the UW bus gets lost on the way to Mankato and other unforseen events occur,
WCHA Standings at a Glance
8th St. Cloud State (5 points) -- Huskies win! Huskies win! As a reward, they get to travel to Duluth and Madison back-to-back before taking out the golf clubs.
While your prose is a little over the top, it's clear that an improvement in defensive numbers is needed. In team offense, OSU ranks #12 in the nation. In team defense, we're just four spots above the bottom. Now if we played a schedule of more average difficulty, there's little doubt that both numbers would be better; maybe a lot better. But the WCHA schedule isn't going to get easier anytime soon. So even though we aren't "horrendous," we must improve. As has been aggressively pointed out by others, some additional size on D would aid the effort.You're right, OSU's problem is not who is on the PP or which position they play, it's the horrendous defense that keeps them from climbing the WCHA ladder. My Columbus connection tells me that the same D make the same mistakes over and over again with pucks not being held in at the blue line, brake out passes in the feet or behind the player...
I presume you're talking about the Brienna Gillanders (#92) goal. Live, it did indeed appear to be the "crowd pleaser" you've described. But after comparing notes with a number of others, I'm convinced the truth is different. The forechecker on the play, Pernilla Winberg (#51), got a big piece of the puck, redirecting it to Gillanders. The play was bang-bang, with Winberg seemingly coming out of nowhere. On reflection, she may have come directly from the bench. On that part of the play, I'm just guessing. Regardless, it was great hustle by Winberg, a forced error, and good fortune for UMD that the puck went directly to Gillanders. It was NOT the unforced error that both of us thought we saw live....and, of course my personal favorite the infamous pass to the other team in the slot which results in a goal is always a crowd pleaser. ( i saw that on Buckeye vision this past Friday).
Very well put pgb-ohio, you seem to be very intuitive.....While your prose is a little over the top, it's clear that an improvement in defensive numbers is needed. In team offense, OSU ranks #12 in the nation. In team defense, we're just four spots above the bottom. Now if we played a schedule of more average difficulty, there's little doubt that both numbers would be better; maybe a lot better. But the WCHA schedule isn't going to get easier anytime soon. So even though we aren't "horrendous," we must improve. As has been aggressively pointed out by others, some additional size on D would aid the effort.
I presume you're talking about the Brienna Gillanders (#92) goal. Live, it did indeed appear to be the "crowd pleaser" you've described. But after comparing notes with a number of others, I'm convinced the truth is different. The forechecker on the play, Pernilla Winberg (#51), got a big piece of the puck, redirecting it to Gillanders. The play was bang-bang, with Winberg seemingly coming out of nowhere. On reflection, she may have come directly from the bench. On that part of the play, I'm just guessing. Regardless, it was great hustle by Winberg, a forced error, and good fortune for UMD that the puck went directly to Gillanders. It was NOT the unforced error that both of us thought we saw live.
Can't give intuition too much credit on this one...Very well put pgb-ohio, you seem to be very intuitive.....
Can't give intuition too much credit on this one...
I'm not sure how BuckeyeVision works, to be quite honest. But if it lets you replay a game you've previously purchased, take another look at the Gillanders goal. I'd be very surprised if it varies much from the description I posted. And if you do get a chance to check it out, I'd be very interested to know where Winberg came from. (bench vs. hustling back into the play) She caught me completely off-guard, and obviously the Buckeye defender as well.[/QUOTE
From what I am told the OSU defense has the tendancy to play with the puck behind there net, if this is indeed true that can only lead to a host of problems in there own zone. What have you witnessed?
Well, as a preliminary matter, I'm not 100% sure what you're asking. If you mean does OSU have an unusual proclivity for intentionally for steering the play behind its own net, I would have to say no. But I think you're really asking whether the Buckeyes are a bit inefficient on the breakout, thus leading to scrums and turnovers behind the net. There could be some to truth to the latter assertion....From what I am told the OSU defense has the tendancy to play with the puck behind there net, if this is indeed true that can only lead to a host of problems in there own zone. What have you witnessed?
Whatever anyone thinks about OSU's defense, it won't be helped with Reilly out. She broke her hand when hit with a slapshot and is in a hard cast. Tough way to likely end your senior season.
Very difficult news. Shannon's been an awesome Buckeye and will be greatly missed.Whatever anyone thinks about OSU's defense, it won't be helped with Reilly out. She broke her hand when hit with a slapshot and is in a hard cast. Tough way to likely end your senior season.
zone.I don't think OSU's defensemen are bad at all. They might be a little small. I also don't think there's a problem with their play behind the net. The problem is they don't mark up or block out in front. I think there system is to crowd in front of the net but can't with there size. With their speed they should be pressuring the play and have everyone responsible for a player in the D zone. That can be corrected with proper coaching.
Their other problem is they play there top 5 or 6 WAY to much that is why I questioned playing Spooner on D shorthanded in a earlier post.
I feel that the OSU players will respond in the play down and will upset whoever they play in the first round.
Again it's much easier to coach from the stands.
Also, agree it is much easier to coach from stands.
There will be a couple of games from this weekend broadcast on Wednesday on the Big Ten Network, according to the on-screen program guide. At 9:00 am CST it is UND@UW; at 1:00 pm BSU@UM will be shown.