What's new
USCHO Fan Forum

This is a sample guest message. Register a free account today to become a member! Once signed in, you'll be able to participate on this site by adding your own topics and posts, as well as connect with other members through your own private inbox!

  • The USCHO Fan Forum has migrated to a new plaform, xenForo. Most of the function of the forum should work in familiar ways. Please note that you can switch between light and dark modes by clicking on the gear icon in the upper right of the main menu bar. We are hoping that this new platform will prove to be faster and more reliable. Please feel free to explore its features.

Utica College: The gang's all here.

And your regular season champion will not be left out. Adrian will be the #1 overall seed no matter what happens the next two Saturdays.
 
And your regular season champion will not be left out. Adrian will be the #1 overall seed no matter what happens the next two Saturdays.

Yes, and why not.

Adrian had the best RS in the nation, if only by a narrow margin.

I have no issue whatsoever with AC being the overall #1 seed, and the PW supports that.
 
Just curious. What do you mean by “ if only by a narrow margin.”

Look at the RPI.

UC and Adrian split two games this season, and Adrian didn't have the same SOS.

But I'm not complaining, AC has the best numbers in the Nation right now.
 
Ok. I’ll admit I’m new to this. Are you saying that Adrian’s SOS is less than Utica’s? Their adjusted RPI is .6959 vs Utica’s .6186. That a spread of .0774. That would make the adjusted RPI spread difference equivalent of #23 Curry and Utica. How is that narrow?
 
Look at the RPI.

UC and Adrian split two games this season, and Adrian didn't have the same SOS.

But I'm not complaining, AC has the best numbers in the Nation right now.

Adrian's SOS was .5243, which was #5 in the country...while Utica's was .5106, which was #26 in the nation. What point were you trying to make here?
 
Adrian's SOS was .5243, which was #5 in the country...while Utica's was .5106, which was #26 in the nation. What point were you trying to make here?

Read the numbers wrong. My bad. Perhaps the post-game whiskey sours has something to do with that... I'll have The Warden read them to me next time.

Yet, in the net, you simply reinforce my contention that AC should have been awarded the hardware yesterday. ;-)

BTW, I also acknowledge that Tom and Oz made some funny comments at my expense. D-3 posters > D-1 posters, with certain glaring exceptions. (Nubby)
 
Last edited:
Read the numbers wrong. My bad.

Yet, in the net, you simply reinforce my contention that AC should be awarded the hardware yesterday.

(Winky face.)

No I don't. Utica should not be rewarded because we beat up on the bottom feeders of Division 3 all season and then took 5 of 6 points from the only other good team. Anyone can win on any given day, that's why the tournament happens. Same reason why they do March Madness in basketball. The best team should win the conference tournament, and if they don't, it's because they fumbled the bag
 
Read the numbers wrong. My bad. Perhaps the post-game whiskey sours has something to do with that... I'll have The Warden read them to me next time.

Yet, in the net, you simply reinforce my contention that AC should have been awarded the hardware yesterday. ;-)

BTW, I also acknowledge that Tom and Oz made some funny comments at my expense. D-3 posters > D-1 posters, with certain glaring exceptions. (Nubby)

Someone's got a case of NDS
 
No I don't. Utica should not be rewarded because we beat up on the bottom feeders of Division 3 all season and then took 5 of 6 points from the only other good team. Anyone can win on any given day, that's why the tournament happens. Same reason why they do March Madness in basketball. The best team should win the conference tournament, and if they don't, it's because they fumbled the bag

Or, it's because the RS was negated by an extraneous PS tournament.

Come on, grow a brain.
 
It’s simple, if your season is over because of a loss in a extraneous PS tournament, then your regular season performance wasn’t good enough.

Every team (other than the WIAC) starts the season with two simple ways to guarantee an NCAA tournament bid:

1. Play well enough in the regular season to finish in the top 4 in the PWR (almost guaranteed and well deserved for Adrian, Utica, Geneseo, and Augsburg at this point)

OR

2. Get hot at the end of the year and win your conference tournament
 
Or, it's because the RS was negated by an extraneous PS tournament.

Come on, grow a brain.

I'm not getting into this again. Fish on a daily basis you make our fanbase look so bad and it's just because of how ignorant you are on this forum

I promise all Utica people are not like this, it's literally just Fish
 
I'm not getting into this again. Fish on a daily basis you make our fanbase look so bad and it's just because of how ignorant you are on this forum

I promise all Utica people are not like this, it's literally just Fish

Totally. I’m genuinely embarrassed for the people actually associated with Utica hockey (coaches, players, parents) because of the nonsense and personal attacks he posts on a daily basis.
 
Totally. I’m genuinely embarrassed for the people actually associated with Utica hockey (coaches, players, parents, professors) because of the nonsense and personal attacks he posts on a daily basis.

........................
 
Stats are stats, people, and tournament AQ's have no inherent merit in any reasonable calculus in that regard.

That's beyond obvious, folks. Ask anyone.
 
Last edited:
Totally. I’m genuinely embarrassed for the people actually associated with Utica hockey (coaches, players, parents) because of the nonsense and personal attacks he posts on a daily basis.

Perhaps you should go and be embarrassed about your own team instead, whomever that is.

There are perhaps 3 or 4 actual UC posters here anymore... And you're not among them.

Not sure why you feel the need to weigh-in.
 
Perhaps you should go and be embarrassed about your own team instead, whomever that is.

There are perhaps 3 or 4 actual UC posters here anymore... And you're not among them.

Not sure why you feel the need to weigh-in.

This is a highly ironic post commenting about others weighing in, considering the hefty amount of narcissism required to post almost 6,000 times in this forum.
 
This is a highly ironic post commenting about others weighing in, considering the hefty amount of narcissism required to post almost 6,000 times in this forum.

Is it 6,000..? I've haven't bothered to look.

But, I've been a UC fan for 22 years, have attempted to talk actual hockey, and have never posted on a SNC thread.

So, again, why are you and your posse on this thread, again? (Assuming that you're all not the same little girl, posing as three people.)

You never talk about anything salient; you just come here to snipe in a cowardly fashion.

Look up "irony", or have someone with a GED do it for you.
 
Last edited:
Back
Top