bigblue_dl
Armed
Re: USCHO Fantasy Football 2010
God dammit. Now i have 2 possession wide receivers for the baltimore ravens.
God dammit. Now i have 2 possession wide receivers for the baltimore ravens.
Too many RB's for only possibly starting 1...Not USCHO; GopherPuckLive draft. 10 team league, Yahoo superscoring, I picked 5th. Any thoughts?
QB: Schaub, Matt Ryan
RB: M Turner, R Mathews, Don Brown, J Forsett, Hightower
WR: Welker, Garcon, Dem Thomas, San Holmes
TE: D Clark
Flex (any WR/RB/TE): Visanthe
K: Crosby/GB
D: Buffalo
We start 1 QB, 2 WR, 1 TE, 1 Flex, K, D.
God dammit. Now i have 2 possession wide receivers for the baltimore ravens.
Too many RB's for only possibly starting 1...
Not USCHO; GopherPuckLive draft. 10 team league, Yahoo superscoring, I picked 5th. Any thoughts?
QB: Schaub, Matt Ryan
RB: M Turner, R Mathews, Don Brown, J Forsett, Hightower
WR: Welker, Garcon, Dem Thomas, San Holmes
TE: D Clark
Flex (any WR/RB/TE): Visanthe
K: Crosby/GB
D: Buffalo
We start 1 QB, 2 WR, 1 TE, 1 Flex, K, D.
In PPR leagues, Turner is average since he has no pass catching ability, but he'll still be okay. Mathews is solid, Welker is a PPR GOD. RBs after Mathews are good, WRs after Garcon are fine but could be better in a 10 teamer. Two top 6 TEs is a bit odd and I still think a TE has no business occupying your Flex.
Buffalo D? really? Wow!
I don't think I've ever made it past the first or second week in one of these contests.You have been invited to join Tim's Private Group in Yahoo! Sports Survival Football.
In order to join the group, just go to Survival Football, and click the "Join a Group" button. From there, enter the following information...
Group ID#: 26914
Password: beavers
to start or not to start: bengals d vs NE or bears d vs DET?
This is guaranteed to bite me in the butt, but the DET offense is supposed to be improved, and I've got the feeling that Chicago is on the decline. I'd actually take the Bengals D here.