What's new
USCHO Fan Forum

This is a sample guest message. Register a free account today to become a member! Once signed in, you'll be able to participate on this site by adding your own topics and posts, as well as connect with other members through your own private inbox!

  • The USCHO Fan Forum has migrated to a new plaform, xenForo. Most of the function of the forum should work in familiar ways. Please note that you can switch between light and dark modes by clicking on the gear icon in the upper right of the main menu bar. We are hoping that this new platform will prove to be faster and more reliable. Please feel free to explore its features.

US Foreign Policy 3.0: We're The Mets of International Diplomacy

Status
Not open for further replies.
Macron tried to broker a deal to give up Ukranian territory to Russia in an effort to halt the war.

Insert French surrender jokes here.

https://twitter.com/KyivIndependent/...67585456418816

I think we all saw this wasn't gonna stop with giving up some breakaway land to Russia. Putin wants to wipe Ukranine off the map.

Well meaning liberals have been suggesting this from the beginning. My only question is whether or not Ukraine would like a say in their sovereignty...
 
Since he's been against any military expense his whole career, he's able to hide behind that consistency. However, we know...

Half the GOP is in the direct pay of Russia, the rest are just Useful Idiots ("You guys are getting paid?").

Genuinely can't tell which Rand is.

This is the dumbest treason ever.
 
Last edited:
In a decade Israel will either be Apartheid South Africa or ANC South Africa*. In either case, we need to stay out of the politics and just cut economic deals with whoever wins.


* Hey, they already have the corruption!
 
Since he's been against any military expense his whole career, he's able to hide behind that consistency. However, we know...

09firstdraft-rand-paul-event-tmagArticle.jpg
 
Macron tried to broker a deal to give up Ukranian territory to Russia in an effort to halt the war.

Insert French surrender jokes here.

https://twitter.com/KyivIndependent/...67585456418816

I think we all saw this wasn't gonna stop with giving up some breakaway land to Russia. Putin wants to wipe Ukranine off the map.

Also, Uncle Putie ain't gonna stop there. Say you give him his land connection to Crimea. You think that's gonna be enough, or next year, or five years from now, we're right back here again? He didn't stop after Chechnia, or Georgia, or Crimea.

You don't appease dictators. They see that as weakness. They only understand strength.
 
Also, Uncle Putie ain't gonna stop there. Say you give him his land connection to Crimea. You think that's gonna be enough, or next year, or five years from now, we're right back here again? He didn't stop after Chechnia, or Georgia, or Crimea.

You don't appease dictators. They see that as weakness. They only understand strength.

naziger3538.gif
 
West gotta choice to make soon:

May 13, 2022

Key Takeaway: Russian President Vladimir Putin likely intends to annex occupied southern and eastern Ukraine directly into the Russian Federation in the coming months. He will likely then state, directly or obliquely, that Russian doctrine permitting the use of nuclear weapons to defend Russian territory applies to those newly annexed territories. Such actions would threaten Ukraine and its partners with nuclear attack if Ukrainian counteroffensives to liberate Russian-occupied territory continue. Putin may believe that the threat or use of nuclear weapons would restore Russian deterrence after his disastrous invasion shattered Russia's conventional deterrent capabilities.

Putin’s timeline for annexation is likely contingent on the extent to which he understands the degraded state of the Russian military in Ukraine. The Russian military has not yet achieved Putin’s stated territorial objectives of securing all of Donetsk and Luhansk oblasts and is unlikely to do so. If Putin understands his military weakness, he will likely rush annexation and introduce the nuclear deterrent quickly in an attempt to retain control of the Ukrainian territory that Russia currently occupies. If Putin believes that Russian forces are capable of additional advances, he will likely delay the annexation in hopes of covering more territory with it. In that case, his poor leadership and Ukrainian counteroffensives could drive the Russian military toward a state of collapse. Putin could also attempt to maintain Russian attacks while mobilizing additional forces. He might delay announcing annexation for far longer in this case, waiting until reinforcements could arrive to gain more territory to annex.

Ukraine and its Western partners likely have a narrow window of opportunity to support a Ukrainian counteroffensive into occupied Ukrainian territory before the Kremlin annexes that territory. Ukraine and the West must also develop a coherent plan for responding to any annexation and to the threat of nuclear attack that might follow it. The political and ethical consequences of a longstanding Russian occupation of southeastern Ukraine would be devastating to the long-term viability of the Ukrainian state. Vital Ukrainian and Western national interests require urgent Western support for an immediate Ukrainian counteroffensive.

Bear in mind, this is ISW. They've done a splendid job covering the war, but their larger geopolitical agenda is the poisonous PNAC Neocon aggression that gave us the GWOT and Iraq. They truly suck.

So, could they be right? Maybe. But do they favor the Anglosphere throwing its weight around to "civilize" the world and smash and grab any resources we want? Fuck yeah they do and they'll all roast in hell for it.
 
The bottom line is you do as much as you can to restore Ukraine in so much as it doesn't cause the use of nuclear weapons. Which is the first and only commandment.
 
Interesting note from ISW's daily:

May 14, 7:00 pm ET

The Ukrainian destruction of significant elements of a Russian motorized rifle brigade that tried to cross a pontoon bridge over the Siverskyi Donets River on May 11 has shocked prominent Russian milbloggers. Those bloggers have begun commenting on the incompetence of the Russian military to their hundreds of thousands of followers. The attempted river crossing showed a stunning lack of tactical sense as satellite images show (destroyed) Russian vehicles tightly bunched up at both ends of the (destroyed) bridge, clearly allowing Ukrainian artillerymen to kill hundreds and destroy scores of vehicles with concentrated strikes. The milbloggers who have hitherto been cheering on the Russian military criticized Russian armed forces leadership for failing to learn from experience in the war. They also expressed the concern that the constant pushing of Russia’s propaganda lines was making it hard for them to understand what was actually going on.

The effects of this change in tone and discourse by these milbloggers are uncertain but could be potent. People living under tightly censored regimes often trust individuals who seem to be independent of but generally aligned with the government more than the government line (even more than do citizens of democratic societies). The commentary by these widely read milbloggers may fuel burgeoning doubts in Russia about Russia’s prospects in this war and the competence of Russia’s military leaders (at least).

The destruction of the motorized rifle elements may also severely disrupt Russian efforts to isolate Severodonetsk and Lysychansk from the north. Russian troops made no attempts to advance in that area in the last 24 hours.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top